Diplomacy & Defense Think Tank News

This study provides early ex-post empirical evidence on the effects of provisionally applied Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) on two-way trade flows between the European Union (EU) and the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States (ACP). Employing the gravity model of trade, we do not find a general EPA effect on total exports from ACP countries to the EU nor on total exports from the EU to ACP countries. We do, however, find heterogeneous effects when focusing on specific agreements and economic sectors. While the agreement between the EU and the Caribbean Forum (CARIFORUM), which concluded several years ahead of the other EPAs in 2008, if anything, reduced imports from the EU overall, the provisional application of the other EPAs seems to have at least partly led to increased imports from the EU to some partner countries. More specifically, the estimation results suggest an increase in the total imports from the EU only in the Southern Africa Development Community (SADC) EPA partner countries. On the sectoral level, by comparison, we find increases in the EU’s agricultural exports to SADC, Eastern and Southern Africa (ESA) and the Pacific. Lastly, in the area of manufactures trade, we find decreases of exports of the ESA and SADC countries to the EU, but increases in imports from the EU into SADC countries. While this early assessment of the EPA effects merits attention given the importance of monitoring future implications of these agreements, it is still too early for a final verdict on the EPAs’ effects and future research is needed to investigate the mid- and long-term consequences of these agreements.

This study provides early ex-post empirical evidence on the effects of provisionally applied Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) on two-way trade flows between the European Union (EU) and the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States (ACP). Employing the gravity model of trade, we do not find a general EPA effect on total exports from ACP countries to the EU nor on total exports from the EU to ACP countries. We do, however, find heterogeneous effects when focusing on specific agreements and economic sectors. While the agreement between the EU and the Caribbean Forum (CARIFORUM), which concluded several years ahead of the other EPAs in 2008, if anything, reduced imports from the EU overall, the provisional application of the other EPAs seems to have at least partly led to increased imports from the EU to some partner countries. More specifically, the estimation results suggest an increase in the total imports from the EU only in the Southern Africa Development Community (SADC) EPA partner countries. On the sectoral level, by comparison, we find increases in the EU’s agricultural exports to SADC, Eastern and Southern Africa (ESA) and the Pacific. Lastly, in the area of manufactures trade, we find decreases of exports of the ESA and SADC countries to the EU, but increases in imports from the EU into SADC countries. While this early assessment of the EPA effects merits attention given the importance of monitoring future implications of these agreements, it is still too early for a final verdict on the EPAs’ effects and future research is needed to investigate the mid- and long-term consequences of these agreements.

This study provides early ex-post empirical evidence on the effects of provisionally applied Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) on two-way trade flows between the European Union (EU) and the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States (ACP). Employing the gravity model of trade, we do not find a general EPA effect on total exports from ACP countries to the EU nor on total exports from the EU to ACP countries. We do, however, find heterogeneous effects when focusing on specific agreements and economic sectors. While the agreement between the EU and the Caribbean Forum (CARIFORUM), which concluded several years ahead of the other EPAs in 2008, if anything, reduced imports from the EU overall, the provisional application of the other EPAs seems to have at least partly led to increased imports from the EU to some partner countries. More specifically, the estimation results suggest an increase in the total imports from the EU only in the Southern Africa Development Community (SADC) EPA partner countries. On the sectoral level, by comparison, we find increases in the EU’s agricultural exports to SADC, Eastern and Southern Africa (ESA) and the Pacific. Lastly, in the area of manufactures trade, we find decreases of exports of the ESA and SADC countries to the EU, but increases in imports from the EU into SADC countries. While this early assessment of the EPA effects merits attention given the importance of monitoring future implications of these agreements, it is still too early for a final verdict on the EPAs’ effects and future research is needed to investigate the mid- and long-term consequences of these agreements.

This study provides early ex-post empirical evidence on the effects of provisionally applied Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) on two-way trade flows between the European Union (EU) and the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States (ACP). Employing the gravity model of trade, we do not find a general EPA effect on total exports from ACP countries to the EU nor on total exports from the EU to ACP countries. We do, however, find heterogeneous effects when focusing on specific agreements and economic sectors. While the agreement between the EU and the Caribbean Forum (CARIFORUM), which concluded several years ahead of the other EPAs in 2008, if anything, reduced imports from the EU overall, the provisional application of the other EPAs seems to have at least partly led to increased imports from the EU to some partner countries. More specifically, the estimation results suggest an increase in the total imports from the EU only in the Southern Africa Development Community (SADC) EPA partner countries. On the sectoral level, by comparison, we find increases in the EU’s agricultural exports to SADC, Eastern and Southern Africa (ESA) and the Pacific. Lastly, in the area of manufactures trade, we find decreases of exports of the ESA and SADC countries to the EU, but increases in imports from the EU into SADC countries. While this early assessment of the EPA effects merits attention given the importance of monitoring future implications of these agreements, it is still too early for a final verdict on the EPAs’ effects and future research is needed to investigate the mid- and long-term consequences of these agreements.

This study provides early ex-post empirical evidence on the effects of provisionally applied Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) on two-way trade flows between the European Union (EU) and the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States (ACP). Employing the gravity model of trade, we do not find a general EPA effect on total exports from ACP countries to the EU nor on total exports from the EU to ACP countries. We do, however, find heterogeneous effects when focusing on specific agreements and economic sectors. While the agreement between the EU and the Caribbean Forum (CARIFORUM), which concluded several years ahead of the other EPAs in 2008, if anything, reduced imports from the EU overall, the provisional application of the other EPAs seems to have at least partly led to increased imports from the EU to some partner countries. More specifically, the estimation results suggest an increase in the total imports from the EU only in the Southern Africa Development Community (SADC) EPA partner countries. On the sectoral level, by comparison, we find increases in the EU’s agricultural exports to SADC, Eastern and Southern Africa (ESA) and the Pacific. Lastly, in the area of manufactures trade, we find decreases of exports of the ESA and SADC countries to the EU, but increases in imports from the EU into SADC countries. While this early assessment of the EPA effects merits attention given the importance of monitoring future implications of these agreements, it is still too early for a final verdict on the EPAs’ effects and future research is needed to investigate the mid- and long-term consequences of these agreements.

Adela Raz, Permanent Representative of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan to the UN and IPI Vice President Adam Lupel

Event Video: 
Photos:

jQuery(document).ready(function(){jQuery("#isloaderfor-ohgtsz").fadeOut(2000, function () { jQuery(".pagwrap-ohgtsz").fadeIn(1000);});});

Afghan women have been at the forefront of bringing peace and development to Afghanistan over the past two decades, but despite this, peace talks and political processes have with few exceptions excluded them.

The Taliban and the United States reached a deal in February arranging for the withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan and setting the stage for talks between the Taliban and the Afghan government. Though women’s rights were not mentioned in the text of the Taliban-US agreement and no female civil society representatives from Afghanistan participated in the talks leading up to it, Afghan women are determined that the upcoming intra-Afghan negotiations protect and enhance the equal rights assured them under the Afghan constitution, including their role in the peace process itself.

On Thursday, March 12th, IPI, together with the Permanent Mission of Afghanistan to the United Nations, hosted an online, live-streamed discussion with four prominent Afghan women leaders in Kabul on the subject of Women’s Inclusion in the Afghan Peace Talks.

Participating in the discussion from Kabul were Hasina Safi, Minister for Information and Culture; Nadima Sahar, Head of the Technical Vocational Education and Training Authority; Onaba Payab, Adviser to Rula Ghani, the First Lady of Afghanistan; and Aisha Khurram, Afghanistan’s Youth Representative to the UN.

Adela Raz, Permanent Representative of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan to the UN, opened the discussion from IPI’s office in New York by stressing the progress that women have made in Afghanistan.

“Women empowerment in Afghanistan is real, it’s genuine, it truly has happened, and I always say that it’s an investment by the international community that really paid off in terms of where we started 19 years ago and where we are now,” she said. “Nineteen years may seem too long ago to worry about, but for a lot of us, it is not too long because we still remember the dark days of the Taliban.”

She asserted that a key principle that women are fighting for now is “inclusivity, and that inclusivity for us means the inclusion of women and also the voice of youth and different ethnic groups.” She said that women are also demanding that the teams of negotiators and facilitators of the talks reflect this inclusivity.

Though those memories of the restrictive Taliban practices are still fresh, she said women will not be revisiting them in the negotiations but rather exercising their hard won present authority and making sure none of it is relinquished. “We’re always able to compromise the past to enable us to coexist with a group of people that we have known for their having committed a lot of crime, but it’s too hard for us to compromise the future.”

Onaba Payab said that women had emerged as leaders in all walks of life in Afghanistan, with 25 percent of the seats in the parliament occupied by women and 5,000 businesses owned by women. Some 15,000 women from 34 provinces had been consulted on what would be acceptable to them in a peace agreement, she said. “We have protective legal frameworks for women’s public and private institutions and a long term plan designed to empower women in rural as well as urban areas.” She described the attitude of women in advance of the intra-Afghan talks as “we know that peace is achievable, and we are moving towards it guided by the principles of inclusivity, dignity and sustainability.”

Hasina Safi said that Afghan women had achieved much on their own at home and would insist on their ideas being treated seriously in the talks, but an element that was crucial now was the active support of Afghanistan’s friends abroad. “We have all the strategies and policies and know what is needed to implement them, and what we need from the international community is for them to back us up. Afghanistan is not the Afghanistan of 1995 where a woman could not introduce herself in front of a foreigner. Today, that woman speaks up, and she analyses, and she reasons, and she fights for her role for her existence for her very meaningful participation in the process, and protecting that is one of the requirements we would like the international community to recognize.”

Nadima Sahar illustrated the new confidence of Afghan women by noting that while she had had to struggle to ensure her right to an education, “now we have kids like my 8-year-old girl who aspires to be the first female president of Afghanistan.”

She argued that the stakes are much higher for women than for men. “For a man, this entire process boils down to growing a beard or shaving a beard. For us women, there is a lot more at stake, our right to an education, our right to live basically, our right to everything is at stake.” For that reason, she said, women had to be present at the negotiating table. “If there is a compromise that needs to be made for their future, they must have a say in what is that decision and what price they have to pay.”

Another asset that women bring to the talks, she said, is their impartiality and bent for seeking non-violent solutions. “Whenever men encounter a peace process, their discussions revolve around military action and power-sharing arrangements and territorial gains, but women’s involvement in the peace process would make sure that issues such as political and legal reforms, social and economic recovery and transitional justice are priorities.”

Elaborating on that point, Aisha Khurram argued that any agreement reached that did not include the active participation of women would be neither durable nor sustainable. “And women should not be included just in the formal negotiation, but they also must be part of the design and implementation of whatever agreement emerges.”

Two thirds of the Afghan population is under the age of 25, and Ms. Khurram said that young women consider themselves “active partners” in forging a peace for Afghanistan’s future rather than “passive beneficiaries” of the process. Similarly, she said, “the new generation of Afghan men really believe in women’s rights, and they really stand for their sisters’ rights.”

Stressing that this is a “pivotal moment” for young women in Afghanistan, she concluded, “Right now the future of Afghanistan is going to be decided so it’s more important for us than just the elites who are sitting there at the negotiating table and talking about our future. We expect more, and we deserve to be heard, and we deserve to be included.”

IPI Program Administrator Masooma Rahmaty reported on a tweet chat about women’s inclusion that she had conducted, some of it in Farsi, with 40 respondents from Kabul and the diaspora.

IPI Vice President Adam Lupel moderated the discussion.

Shared values are deemed necessary as a solid foundation for social cohesion by commentators and observers in many countries. However, when examining what kind of values this is based on, answers often come down to platitudes and national clichés. This discussion paper offers some clarification through both a theoretical explication and an empirical exploration concerning the general role of values for social cohesion.
Values are notions about desirable, trans-situational end-states and behaviours. They fall into two categories, individual and societal values. We provide a critical discussion of the most prominent conceptualisations and their operationalisation in the social sciences.
Values affect social cohesion in three possible pathways: First, when they are shared; second, when they promote behaviour per se conducive to social cohesion and third, through their effect on policy choice and institutional design. We review evidence provided by the research literature for each of these pathways.
We further explore the third pathway by deriving from the research literature the conjecture that a cultural value emphasis on egalitarianism makes a universalistic scope of welfare institutions more likely, which in turn increases social and political trust. We first examine this conjecture with a series of regression models, and then run a mediation analysis. The results show that (1.) egalitarian values are moderately strongly and positively linked to universalistic welfare institutions, but that (2.) welfare institutions mediate the association of egalitarian values with social trust only to a small extent and that (3.) more universalistic welfare institutions counteract a negative association between egalitarian values and institutional trust.

Shared values are deemed necessary as a solid foundation for social cohesion by commentators and observers in many countries. However, when examining what kind of values this is based on, answers often come down to platitudes and national clichés. This discussion paper offers some clarification through both a theoretical explication and an empirical exploration concerning the general role of values for social cohesion.
Values are notions about desirable, trans-situational end-states and behaviours. They fall into two categories, individual and societal values. We provide a critical discussion of the most prominent conceptualisations and their operationalisation in the social sciences.
Values affect social cohesion in three possible pathways: First, when they are shared; second, when they promote behaviour per se conducive to social cohesion and third, through their effect on policy choice and institutional design. We review evidence provided by the research literature for each of these pathways.
We further explore the third pathway by deriving from the research literature the conjecture that a cultural value emphasis on egalitarianism makes a universalistic scope of welfare institutions more likely, which in turn increases social and political trust. We first examine this conjecture with a series of regression models, and then run a mediation analysis. The results show that (1.) egalitarian values are moderately strongly and positively linked to universalistic welfare institutions, but that (2.) welfare institutions mediate the association of egalitarian values with social trust only to a small extent and that (3.) more universalistic welfare institutions counteract a negative association between egalitarian values and institutional trust.

Shared values are deemed necessary as a solid foundation for social cohesion by commentators and observers in many countries. However, when examining what kind of values this is based on, answers often come down to platitudes and national clichés. This discussion paper offers some clarification through both a theoretical explication and an empirical exploration concerning the general role of values for social cohesion.
Values are notions about desirable, trans-situational end-states and behaviours. They fall into two categories, individual and societal values. We provide a critical discussion of the most prominent conceptualisations and their operationalisation in the social sciences.
Values affect social cohesion in three possible pathways: First, when they are shared; second, when they promote behaviour per se conducive to social cohesion and third, through their effect on policy choice and institutional design. We review evidence provided by the research literature for each of these pathways.
We further explore the third pathway by deriving from the research literature the conjecture that a cultural value emphasis on egalitarianism makes a universalistic scope of welfare institutions more likely, which in turn increases social and political trust. We first examine this conjecture with a series of regression models, and then run a mediation analysis. The results show that (1.) egalitarian values are moderately strongly and positively linked to universalistic welfare institutions, but that (2.) welfare institutions mediate the association of egalitarian values with social trust only to a small extent and that (3.) more universalistic welfare institutions counteract a negative association between egalitarian values and institutional trust.

Shared values are deemed necessary as a solid foundation for social cohesion by commentators and observers in many countries. However, when examining what kind of values this is based on, answers often come down to platitudes and national clichés. This discussion paper offers some clarification through both a theoretical explication and an empirical exploration concerning the general role of values for social cohesion.
Values are notions about desirable, trans-situational end-states and behaviours. They fall into two categories, individual and societal values. We provide a critical discussion of the most prominent conceptualisations and their operationalisation in the social sciences.
Values affect social cohesion in three possible pathways: First, when they are shared; second, when they promote behaviour per se conducive to social cohesion and third, through their effect on policy choice and institutional design. We review evidence provided by the research literature for each of these pathways.
We further explore the third pathway by deriving from the research literature the conjecture that a cultural value emphasis on egalitarianism makes a universalistic scope of welfare institutions more likely, which in turn increases social and political trust. We first examine this conjecture with a series of regression models, and then run a mediation analysis. The results show that (1.) egalitarian values are moderately strongly and positively linked to universalistic welfare institutions, but that (2.) welfare institutions mediate the association of egalitarian values with social trust only to a small extent and that (3.) more universalistic welfare institutions counteract a negative association between egalitarian values and institutional trust.

Shared values are deemed necessary as a solid foundation for social cohesion by commentators and observers in many countries. However, when examining what kind of values this is based on, answers often come down to platitudes and national clichés. This discussion paper offers some clarification through both a theoretical explication and an empirical exploration concerning the general role of values for social cohesion.
Values are notions about desirable, trans-situational end-states and behaviours. They fall into two categories, individual and societal values. We provide a critical discussion of the most prominent conceptualisations and their operationalisation in the social sciences.
Values affect social cohesion in three possible pathways: First, when they are shared; second, when they promote behaviour per se conducive to social cohesion and third, through their effect on policy choice and institutional design. We review evidence provided by the research literature for each of these pathways.
We further explore the third pathway by deriving from the research literature the conjecture that a cultural value emphasis on egalitarianism makes a universalistic scope of welfare institutions more likely, which in turn increases social and political trust. We first examine this conjecture with a series of regression models, and then run a mediation analysis. The results show that (1.) egalitarian values are moderately strongly and positively linked to universalistic welfare institutions, but that (2.) welfare institutions mediate the association of egalitarian values with social trust only to a small extent and that (3.) more universalistic welfare institutions counteract a negative association between egalitarian values and institutional trust.

Shared values are deemed necessary as a solid foundation for social cohesion by commentators and observers in many countries. However, when examining what kind of values this is based on, answers often come down to platitudes and national clichés. This discussion paper offers some clarification through both a theoretical explication and an empirical exploration concerning the general role of values for social cohesion.
Values are notions about desirable, trans-situational end-states and behaviours. They fall into two categories, individual and societal values. We provide a critical discussion of the most prominent conceptualisations and their operationalisation in the social sciences.
Values affect social cohesion in three possible pathways: First, when they are shared; second, when they promote behaviour per se conducive to social cohesion and third, through their effect on policy choice and institutional design. We review evidence provided by the research literature for each of these pathways.
We further explore the third pathway by deriving from the research literature the conjecture that a cultural value emphasis on egalitarianism makes a universalistic scope of welfare institutions more likely, which in turn increases social and political trust. We first examine this conjecture with a series of regression models, and then run a mediation analysis. The results show that (1.) egalitarian values are moderately strongly and positively linked to universalistic welfare institutions, but that (2.) welfare institutions mediate the association of egalitarian values with social trust only to a small extent and that (3.) more universalistic welfare institutions counteract a negative association between egalitarian values and institutional trust.

Die EZB hat heute angekündigt, angesichts der Corona-Ausbreitung ihr Kreditprogramm aufzustocken und zusätzliche Anleihenkäufe zu tätigen. Die Maßnahmen kommentiert DIW-Präsident Marcel Fratzscher wie folgt:

Die EZB - zusammen mit der Bankenaufsicht SSM — setzt mit ihren heute vorgestellten Maßnahmen ein starkes Signal, um Banken bei der Kreditvergabe zu unterstützen. Die EZB hat ein kluges Paket geschnürt, das vor allem kleineren und mittleren Unternehmen helfen wird, eine wirtschaftliche Rezession besser zu meistern. Trotzdem wird die EZB allein einen wirtschaftlichen Abschwung nicht verhindern können. Deswegen ist es so wichtig und richtig, dass alle großen Zentralbanken der Welt nun frühzeitig und entschlossen gehandelt haben, um auf die Risiken der wirtschaftlichen Abschwächung durch das Corona-Virus zu reagieren. Nur so lässt sich Vertrauen von Märkten, Unternehmen sowie Bürgerinnen und Bürger erhalten und stärken. Die Entscheidung der EZB ist zudem ein starkes Signal an die Politik, dass diese nun endlich ebenfalls entschiedener und mutiger agieren muss. Die Politik in Europa darf sich nicht darauf verlassen, dass die Zentralbank ihnen diese Aufgabe abnehmen kann. Sie sollte also ebenso entschlossen reagieren und ein koordiniertes Konjunkturprogramm aufsetzen. Die EZB-Entscheidung dürfte wieder einmal auf Kritik aus Deutschland stoßen, weil die EZB erneut die geldpolitischen Zügel gelockert hat und weitere Anleihekäufe tätigen wird. Doch dies ist der richtige Weg, um die Wirtschaft zu unterstützen und Finanzstabilität zu gewährleisten. Ich erwarte, dass dies nur der Anfang einer Reihe von geldpolitischen Maßnahmen der EZB ist, um eine wahrscheinliche Rezession im Euroraum abzumildern. Leider ist die EZB mit ihrer Wachstumsprognose noch deutlich zu optimistisch.

Developing a European Indo-Pacific strategy for a changing global order

Vi arbejder hjemmefra som følge af covid-19. Biblioteket er lukket, men du kan fortsat finde os her på nettet.

Vi arbejder hjemmefra som følge af covid-19. Biblioteket er lukket, men du kan fortsat finde os her på nettet.

The social contract is a key concept in social science literature focusing on state–society relations. It refers to the “entirety of explicit or implicit agreements between all relevant societal groups and the sovereign (i.e. the government or any other actor in power), defining their rights and obligations towards each other” (Loewe & Zintl, forthcoming).

The analysis of social contracts helps the understanding of: (i) why some societal groups are socially, politically or economically better off than others, (ii) why some revolt and demand a new social contract and, thus, (iii) why a country descends into violent conflict. In addition, the concept shows how foreign interventions and international co-operation may affect state–society relations by strengthening the position of the state or of specific societal groups. It illustrates that state fragility, displacement and migration can arise from social contracts becoming less inclusive.

Nevertheless, the term “social contract” has so far been neither well defined nor operationalised – to the detriment of both research and of bi- and multilateral co-operation. Such a structured analytical approach to state–society relations is badly needed both in research and in politics, in particular but not exclusively for the analysis of MENA countries. This briefing paper sets the frame, suggesting a close analysis of (i) the scope of social contracts, (ii) their substance and (iii) their temporal dimension.

After independence, MENA governments established a specific kind of social contract with citizens, mainly based on the redistribution of rents from natural resources, development aid and other forms of transfers.

They provided subsidised food and energy, free public education and government jobs to citizens in compensation for the tacit recognition of political regimes’ legitimacy despite a lack of political participation. But with growing populations and declining state revenues, some governments lost their ability to fulfil their duties and focused spending on strategically important social groups, increasingly tying resource provision to political acquiescence.

The uprisings that took place in many Arab countries in 2011 can be seen as an expression of deep dissatisfaction with social contracts that no longer provided either political participation or substantial social benefits (at least for large parts of the population).

After the uprisings, MENA countries developed in different directions. While Tunisia is a fair way towards more inclusive development and political participation, Morocco and Jordan are trying to restore some parts of the former social contract, providing for paternalistic distribution without substantial participation. In Egypt’s emerging social contract, the government promises little more than individual and collective security, and that only under the condition of full political acquiescence. Libya, Yemen and Syria have fallen into civil wars with no countrywide new contract in sight, and Iraq has been struggling for one since 2003. In addition, flight and migration also affect the social contracts of neighbouring countries such as Jordan, Turkey, and Lebanon.

All MENA countries are designing, or will need to design, new social contracts in order to reduce the current instability and enable physical reconstruction. This briefing paper informs on the status of conceptual considerations of social contract renegotiation in MENA countries and its meaning for international co-operation with them.

ملخّص

يُعدُّ العقد الاجتماعي مفهوماً أساسياً في أدبيات العلوم الاجتماعية ويركّز على العلاقات بين الدولة والمجتمع، ويشير إلى "كل الإتفاقات الصريحة أو الضمنية بين كل الفئات المجتمعية والسيادة (أي: الحكومة أو أي ممثل آخر في السلطة)، التي تحدد حقوقهم والتزاماتهم تجاه بعضهم بعضاً" (Loewe & Zintl forthcoming).

يساعد تحليل العقود الاجتماعية على فهم (I) لما تمتاز بعض الفئات المجتمعية على غيرها اجتماعياً أو سياسياً أو اقتصادياً، و(II) لماذا تثور بعضها وتطالب بعقدٍ اجتماعيٍ جديد، ومن ثَمَ (III) لماذا ينجرّ بلدٌ ما إلى نزاعٍ عنيف. بالإضافة إلى ذلك، يظهر التحليل كيف أن التدخلات الأجنبية والتعاون الدولى قد يؤثران على العلاقات بين الدولة والمجتمع عن طريق تقويتها لمركز الدولة أو فئات مجتمعيةٍ بعينها، ويوضّح التحليل أيضاً أن هشاشة الدولة والنزوح والهجرة قد تنشأ من العقود الاجتماعية التي تزداد في إقصائيتها. 

على الرغم من ذلك، لم يتم تعريف أو تفعيل مصطلح "العقد الاجتماعي" حتى الآن ما سبب الضرر للبحث العلمى ولِلتعاون الدولى الثنائي والمتعدد الأطراف. تشتد الحاجة في البحث العلمى وفى والسياسة لهذه المقاربة التحليلية الهيكلية للعلاقات بين الدولة والمجتمع، وبشكل خاص ولكن غير حصري، في دول الشرق الأوسط وشمال أفريقيا. تحدد ورقة الإحاطة هذه الإطار، وتقترح تحليلاً عميقاً لـ (I) نطاق العقود الاجتماعية و(II) محتواها و(III) بعدها الزمني. 

بعد استقلالها، قامت حكومات الشرق الأوسط وشمال أفريقيا بتأسيس نوعٍ خاصٍ من العقود الاجتماعية مع المواطنين، قائم بشكلٍ أساسي على إعادة توزيع عائدات الموارد الطبيعية ومعونة التنمية وأشكال التحويلات الأخرى، وقامت الحكومات بتوفير الغذاء والطاقة بأسعارٍ

ضمني بشرعية الأنظمة السياسية، على الرغم من انعدام المشاركة السياسية. ولكن، ومع النمو السكاني وانخفاض عائدات الدولة، فقدت بعض الحكومات قدرتها على تحقيق التزاماتها، وركزت الإنفاق على الفئات الاجتماعية ذات الأهمية الاستراتيجية، رابطة بذلك توزيع الموارد بشكل متزايد الإذعان السياسي. 

بعد الثورات، اتخذت دول الشرق الأوسط وشمال أفريقيا وجهات مختلفة. فبينما قطعت تونس شوطاً في طريقها نحو تنمية أكثر شمولاً ومشاركة سياسية، يحاول المغرب والأردن الإبقاء على أجزاء من العقد الاجتماعي السابق موفرين توزيعاً رعوياً أبوياً دون مشاركة حقيقية. أما في العقد الاجتماعي الناشئ في مصر، فلا تَعد الحكومة بأكثر من الأمن الفردي والجماعي، وذلك شريطة الإذعان السياسي الكامل. ووقعت كلٌ من ليبيا واليمن وسوريا في حروب أهلية بلا عقود اجتماعية جديدة على مستوى البلاد في الأفق، وفي العراق، فإن البلد يكافح للوصول إلى عقد اجتماعي منذ 2003. بالإضافة إلى ذلك، يؤثر الفرار والهجرة على العقود الاجتماعية في البلدان المجاورة كالأردن وتركيا ولبنان. 

تعمل كل دول الشرق الأوسط وشمال أفريقيا على تصميم أو يوجب عليها تصميم عقود اجتماعية جديدة للتقليل من حالة عدم الاستقرار الحالية ولإتاحة الفرصة لإعادة إعمارٍحقيقي. توضح هذه الورقة وضع مفاهيم إعادة التفاوض بشأن العقود الاجتماعية في بلدان الشرق الأوسط وشمال أفريقيا، وما تعنيه للتعاون الدولي معهم.

The social contract is a key concept in social science literature focusing on state–society relations. It refers to the “entirety of explicit or implicit agreements between all relevant societal groups and the sovereign (i.e. the government or any other actor in power), defining their rights and obligations towards each other” (Loewe & Zintl, forthcoming).

The analysis of social contracts helps the understanding of: (i) why some societal groups are socially, politically or economically better off than others, (ii) why some revolt and demand a new social contract and, thus, (iii) why a country descends into violent conflict. In addition, the concept shows how foreign interventions and international co-operation may affect state–society relations by strengthening the position of the state or of specific societal groups. It illustrates that state fragility, displacement and migration can arise from social contracts becoming less inclusive.

Nevertheless, the term “social contract” has so far been neither well defined nor operationalised – to the detriment of both research and of bi- and multilateral co-operation. Such a structured analytical approach to state–society relations is badly needed both in research and in politics, in particular but not exclusively for the analysis of MENA countries. This briefing paper sets the frame, suggesting a close analysis of (i) the scope of social contracts, (ii) their substance and (iii) their temporal dimension.

After independence, MENA governments established a specific kind of social contract with citizens, mainly based on the redistribution of rents from natural resources, development aid and other forms of transfers.

They provided subsidised food and energy, free public education and government jobs to citizens in compensation for the tacit recognition of political regimes’ legitimacy despite a lack of political participation. But with growing populations and declining state revenues, some governments lost their ability to fulfil their duties and focused spending on strategically important social groups, increasingly tying resource provision to political acquiescence.

The uprisings that took place in many Arab countries in 2011 can be seen as an expression of deep dissatisfaction with social contracts that no longer provided either political participation or substantial social benefits (at least for large parts of the population).

After the uprisings, MENA countries developed in different directions. While Tunisia is a fair way towards more inclusive development and political participation, Morocco and Jordan are trying to restore some parts of the former social contract, providing for paternalistic distribution without substantial participation. In Egypt’s emerging social contract, the government promises little more than individual and collective security, and that only under the condition of full political acquiescence. Libya, Yemen and Syria have fallen into civil wars with no countrywide new contract in sight, and Iraq has been struggling for one since 2003. In addition, flight and migration also affect the social contracts of neighbouring countries such as Jordan, Turkey, and Lebanon.

All MENA countries are designing, or will need to design, new social contracts in order to reduce the current instability and enable physical reconstruction. This briefing paper informs on the status of conceptual considerations of social contract renegotiation in MENA countries and its meaning for international co-operation with them.

ملخّص

يُعدُّ العقد الاجتماعي مفهوماً أساسياً في أدبيات العلوم الاجتماعية ويركّز على العلاقات بين الدولة والمجتمع، ويشير إلى "كل الإتفاقات الصريحة أو الضمنية بين كل الفئات المجتمعية والسيادة (أي: الحكومة أو أي ممثل آخر في السلطة)، التي تحدد حقوقهم والتزاماتهم تجاه بعضهم بعضاً" (Loewe & Zintl forthcoming).

يساعد تحليل العقود الاجتماعية على فهم (I) لما تمتاز بعض الفئات المجتمعية على غيرها اجتماعياً أو سياسياً أو اقتصادياً، و(II) لماذا تثور بعضها وتطالب بعقدٍ اجتماعيٍ جديد، ومن ثَمَ (III) لماذا ينجرّ بلدٌ ما إلى نزاعٍ عنيف. بالإضافة إلى ذلك، يظهر التحليل كيف أن التدخلات الأجنبية والتعاون الدولى قد يؤثران على العلاقات بين الدولة والمجتمع عن طريق تقويتها لمركز الدولة أو فئات مجتمعيةٍ بعينها، ويوضّح التحليل أيضاً أن هشاشة الدولة والنزوح والهجرة قد تنشأ من العقود الاجتماعية التي تزداد في إقصائيتها. 

على الرغم من ذلك، لم يتم تعريف أو تفعيل مصطلح "العقد الاجتماعي" حتى الآن ما سبب الضرر للبحث العلمى ولِلتعاون الدولى الثنائي والمتعدد الأطراف. تشتد الحاجة في البحث العلمى وفى والسياسة لهذه المقاربة التحليلية الهيكلية للعلاقات بين الدولة والمجتمع، وبشكل خاص ولكن غير حصري، في دول الشرق الأوسط وشمال أفريقيا. تحدد ورقة الإحاطة هذه الإطار، وتقترح تحليلاً عميقاً لـ (I) نطاق العقود الاجتماعية و(II) محتواها و(III) بعدها الزمني. 

بعد استقلالها، قامت حكومات الشرق الأوسط وشمال أفريقيا بتأسيس نوعٍ خاصٍ من العقود الاجتماعية مع المواطنين، قائم بشكلٍ أساسي على إعادة توزيع عائدات الموارد الطبيعية ومعونة التنمية وأشكال التحويلات الأخرى، وقامت الحكومات بتوفير الغذاء والطاقة بأسعارٍ

ضمني بشرعية الأنظمة السياسية، على الرغم من انعدام المشاركة السياسية. ولكن، ومع النمو السكاني وانخفاض عائدات الدولة، فقدت بعض الحكومات قدرتها على تحقيق التزاماتها، وركزت الإنفاق على الفئات الاجتماعية ذات الأهمية الاستراتيجية، رابطة بذلك توزيع الموارد بشكل متزايد الإذعان السياسي. 

بعد الثورات، اتخذت دول الشرق الأوسط وشمال أفريقيا وجهات مختلفة. فبينما قطعت تونس شوطاً في طريقها نحو تنمية أكثر شمولاً ومشاركة سياسية، يحاول المغرب والأردن الإبقاء على أجزاء من العقد الاجتماعي السابق موفرين توزيعاً رعوياً أبوياً دون مشاركة حقيقية. أما في العقد الاجتماعي الناشئ في مصر، فلا تَعد الحكومة بأكثر من الأمن الفردي والجماعي، وذلك شريطة الإذعان السياسي الكامل. ووقعت كلٌ من ليبيا واليمن وسوريا في حروب أهلية بلا عقود اجتماعية جديدة على مستوى البلاد في الأفق، وفي العراق، فإن البلد يكافح للوصول إلى عقد اجتماعي منذ 2003. بالإضافة إلى ذلك، يؤثر الفرار والهجرة على العقود الاجتماعية في البلدان المجاورة كالأردن وتركيا ولبنان. 

تعمل كل دول الشرق الأوسط وشمال أفريقيا على تصميم أو يوجب عليها تصميم عقود اجتماعية جديدة للتقليل من حالة عدم الاستقرار الحالية ولإتاحة الفرصة لإعادة إعمارٍحقيقي. توضح هذه الورقة وضع مفاهيم إعادة التفاوض بشأن العقود الاجتماعية في بلدان الشرق الأوسط وشمال أفريقيا، وما تعنيه للتعاون الدولي معهم.

The social contract is a key concept in social science literature focusing on state–society relations. It refers to the “entirety of explicit or implicit agreements between all relevant societal groups and the sovereign (i.e. the government or any other actor in power), defining their rights and obligations towards each other” (Loewe & Zintl, forthcoming).

The analysis of social contracts helps the understanding of: (i) why some societal groups are socially, politically or economically better off than others, (ii) why some revolt and demand a new social contract and, thus, (iii) why a country descends into violent conflict. In addition, the concept shows how foreign interventions and international co-operation may affect state–society relations by strengthening the position of the state or of specific societal groups. It illustrates that state fragility, displacement and migration can arise from social contracts becoming less inclusive.

Nevertheless, the term “social contract” has so far been neither well defined nor operationalised – to the detriment of both research and of bi- and multilateral co-operation. Such a structured analytical approach to state–society relations is badly needed both in research and in politics, in particular but not exclusively for the analysis of MENA countries. This briefing paper sets the frame, suggesting a close analysis of (i) the scope of social contracts, (ii) their substance and (iii) their temporal dimension.

After independence, MENA governments established a specific kind of social contract with citizens, mainly based on the redistribution of rents from natural resources, development aid and other forms of transfers.

They provided subsidised food and energy, free public education and government jobs to citizens in compensation for the tacit recognition of political regimes’ legitimacy despite a lack of political participation. But with growing populations and declining state revenues, some governments lost their ability to fulfil their duties and focused spending on strategically important social groups, increasingly tying resource provision to political acquiescence.

The uprisings that took place in many Arab countries in 2011 can be seen as an expression of deep dissatisfaction with social contracts that no longer provided either political participation or substantial social benefits (at least for large parts of the population).

After the uprisings, MENA countries developed in different directions. While Tunisia is a fair way towards more inclusive development and political participation, Morocco and Jordan are trying to restore some parts of the former social contract, providing for paternalistic distribution without substantial participation. In Egypt’s emerging social contract, the government promises little more than individual and collective security, and that only under the condition of full political acquiescence. Libya, Yemen and Syria have fallen into civil wars with no countrywide new contract in sight, and Iraq has been struggling for one since 2003. In addition, flight and migration also affect the social contracts of neighbouring countries such as Jordan, Turkey, and Lebanon.

All MENA countries are designing, or will need to design, new social contracts in order to reduce the current instability and enable physical reconstruction. This briefing paper informs on the status of conceptual considerations of social contract renegotiation in MENA countries and its meaning for international co-operation with them.

ملخّص

يُعدُّ العقد الاجتماعي مفهوماً أساسياً في أدبيات العلوم الاجتماعية ويركّز على العلاقات بين الدولة والمجتمع، ويشير إلى "كل الإتفاقات الصريحة أو الضمنية بين كل الفئات المجتمعية والسيادة (أي: الحكومة أو أي ممثل آخر في السلطة)، التي تحدد حقوقهم والتزاماتهم تجاه بعضهم بعضاً" (Loewe & Zintl forthcoming).

يساعد تحليل العقود الاجتماعية على فهم (I) لما تمتاز بعض الفئات المجتمعية على غيرها اجتماعياً أو سياسياً أو اقتصادياً، و(II) لماذا تثور بعضها وتطالب بعقدٍ اجتماعيٍ جديد، ومن ثَمَ (III) لماذا ينجرّ بلدٌ ما إلى نزاعٍ عنيف. بالإضافة إلى ذلك، يظهر التحليل كيف أن التدخلات الأجنبية والتعاون الدولى قد يؤثران على العلاقات بين الدولة والمجتمع عن طريق تقويتها لمركز الدولة أو فئات مجتمعيةٍ بعينها، ويوضّح التحليل أيضاً أن هشاشة الدولة والنزوح والهجرة قد تنشأ من العقود الاجتماعية التي تزداد في إقصائيتها. 

على الرغم من ذلك، لم يتم تعريف أو تفعيل مصطلح "العقد الاجتماعي" حتى الآن ما سبب الضرر للبحث العلمى ولِلتعاون الدولى الثنائي والمتعدد الأطراف. تشتد الحاجة في البحث العلمى وفى والسياسة لهذه المقاربة التحليلية الهيكلية للعلاقات بين الدولة والمجتمع، وبشكل خاص ولكن غير حصري، في دول الشرق الأوسط وشمال أفريقيا. تحدد ورقة الإحاطة هذه الإطار، وتقترح تحليلاً عميقاً لـ (I) نطاق العقود الاجتماعية و(II) محتواها و(III) بعدها الزمني. 

بعد استقلالها، قامت حكومات الشرق الأوسط وشمال أفريقيا بتأسيس نوعٍ خاصٍ من العقود الاجتماعية مع المواطنين، قائم بشكلٍ أساسي على إعادة توزيع عائدات الموارد الطبيعية ومعونة التنمية وأشكال التحويلات الأخرى، وقامت الحكومات بتوفير الغذاء والطاقة بأسعارٍ

ضمني بشرعية الأنظمة السياسية، على الرغم من انعدام المشاركة السياسية. ولكن، ومع النمو السكاني وانخفاض عائدات الدولة، فقدت بعض الحكومات قدرتها على تحقيق التزاماتها، وركزت الإنفاق على الفئات الاجتماعية ذات الأهمية الاستراتيجية، رابطة بذلك توزيع الموارد بشكل متزايد الإذعان السياسي. 

بعد الثورات، اتخذت دول الشرق الأوسط وشمال أفريقيا وجهات مختلفة. فبينما قطعت تونس شوطاً في طريقها نحو تنمية أكثر شمولاً ومشاركة سياسية، يحاول المغرب والأردن الإبقاء على أجزاء من العقد الاجتماعي السابق موفرين توزيعاً رعوياً أبوياً دون مشاركة حقيقية. أما في العقد الاجتماعي الناشئ في مصر، فلا تَعد الحكومة بأكثر من الأمن الفردي والجماعي، وذلك شريطة الإذعان السياسي الكامل. ووقعت كلٌ من ليبيا واليمن وسوريا في حروب أهلية بلا عقود اجتماعية جديدة على مستوى البلاد في الأفق، وفي العراق، فإن البلد يكافح للوصول إلى عقد اجتماعي منذ 2003. بالإضافة إلى ذلك، يؤثر الفرار والهجرة على العقود الاجتماعية في البلدان المجاورة كالأردن وتركيا ولبنان. 

تعمل كل دول الشرق الأوسط وشمال أفريقيا على تصميم أو يوجب عليها تصميم عقود اجتماعية جديدة للتقليل من حالة عدم الاستقرار الحالية ولإتاحة الفرصة لإعادة إعمارٍحقيقي. توضح هذه الورقة وضع مفاهيم إعادة التفاوض بشأن العقود الاجتماعية في بلدان الشرق الأوسط وشمال أفريقيا، وما تعنيه للتعاون الدولي معهم.

The social contract is a key concept in social science literature focusing on state–society relations. It refers to the “entirety of explicit or implicit agreements between all relevant societal groups and the sovereign (i.e. the government or any other actor in power), defining their rights and obligations towards each other” (Loewe & Zintl, forthcoming).

The analysis of social contracts helps the understanding of: (i) why some societal groups are socially, politically or economically better off than others, (ii) why some revolt and demand a new social contract and, thus, (iii) why a country descends into violent conflict. In addition, the concept shows how foreign interventions and international co-operation may affect state–society relations by strengthening the position of the state or of specific societal groups. It illustrates that state fragility, displacement and migration can arise from social contracts becoming less inclusive.

Nevertheless, the term “social contract” has so far been neither well defined nor operationalised – to the detriment of both research and of bi- and multilateral co-operation. Such a structured analytical approach to state–society relations is badly needed both in research and in politics, in particular but not exclusively for the analysis of MENA countries. This briefing paper sets the frame, suggesting a close analysis of (i) the scope of social contracts, (ii) their substance and (iii) their temporal dimension.

After independence, MENA governments established a specific kind of social contract with citizens, mainly based on the redistribution of rents from natural resources, development aid and other forms of transfers.

They provided subsidised food and energy, free public education and government jobs to citizens in compensation for the tacit recognition of political regimes’ legitimacy despite a lack of political participation. But with growing populations and declining state revenues, some governments lost their ability to fulfil their duties and focused spending on strategically important social groups, increasingly tying resource provision to political acquiescence.

The uprisings that took place in many Arab countries in 2011 can be seen as an expression of deep dissatisfaction with social contracts that no longer provided either political participation or substantial social benefits (at least for large parts of the population).

After the uprisings, MENA countries developed in different directions. While Tunisia is a fair way towards more inclusive development and political participation, Morocco and Jordan are trying to restore some parts of the former social contract, providing for paternalistic distribution without substantial participation. In Egypt’s emerging social contract, the government promises little more than individual and collective security, and that only under the condition of full political acquiescence. Libya, Yemen and Syria have fallen into civil wars with no countrywide new contract in sight, and Iraq has been struggling for one since 2003. In addition, flight and migration also affect the social contracts of neighbouring countries such as Jordan, Turkey, and Lebanon.

All MENA countries are designing, or will need to design, new social contracts in order to reduce the current instability and enable physical reconstruction. This briefing paper informs on the status of conceptual considerations of social contract renegotiation in MENA countries and its meaning for international co-operation with them.

ملخّص

يُعدُّ العقد الاجتماعي مفهوماً أساسياً في أدبيات العلوم الاجتماعية ويركّز على العلاقات بين الدولة والمجتمع، ويشير إلى "كل الإتفاقات الصريحة أو الضمنية بين كل الفئات المجتمعية والسيادة (أي: الحكومة أو أي ممثل آخر في السلطة)، التي تحدد حقوقهم والتزاماتهم تجاه بعضهم بعضاً" (Loewe & Zintl forthcoming).

يساعد تحليل العقود الاجتماعية على فهم (I) لما تمتاز بعض الفئات المجتمعية على غيرها اجتماعياً أو سياسياً أو اقتصادياً، و(II) لماذا تثور بعضها وتطالب بعقدٍ اجتماعيٍ جديد، ومن ثَمَ (III) لماذا ينجرّ بلدٌ ما إلى نزاعٍ عنيف. بالإضافة إلى ذلك، يظهر التحليل كيف أن التدخلات الأجنبية والتعاون الدولى قد يؤثران على العلاقات بين الدولة والمجتمع عن طريق تقويتها لمركز الدولة أو فئات مجتمعيةٍ بعينها، ويوضّح التحليل أيضاً أن هشاشة الدولة والنزوح والهجرة قد تنشأ من العقود الاجتماعية التي تزداد في إقصائيتها. 

على الرغم من ذلك، لم يتم تعريف أو تفعيل مصطلح "العقد الاجتماعي" حتى الآن ما سبب الضرر للبحث العلمى ولِلتعاون الدولى الثنائي والمتعدد الأطراف. تشتد الحاجة في البحث العلمى وفى والسياسة لهذه المقاربة التحليلية الهيكلية للعلاقات بين الدولة والمجتمع، وبشكل خاص ولكن غير حصري، في دول الشرق الأوسط وشمال أفريقيا. تحدد ورقة الإحاطة هذه الإطار، وتقترح تحليلاً عميقاً لـ (I) نطاق العقود الاجتماعية و(II) محتواها و(III) بعدها الزمني. 

بعد استقلالها، قامت حكومات الشرق الأوسط وشمال أفريقيا بتأسيس نوعٍ خاصٍ من العقود الاجتماعية مع المواطنين، قائم بشكلٍ أساسي على إعادة توزيع عائدات الموارد الطبيعية ومعونة التنمية وأشكال التحويلات الأخرى، وقامت الحكومات بتوفير الغذاء والطاقة بأسعارٍ

ضمني بشرعية الأنظمة السياسية، على الرغم من انعدام المشاركة السياسية. ولكن، ومع النمو السكاني وانخفاض عائدات الدولة، فقدت بعض الحكومات قدرتها على تحقيق التزاماتها، وركزت الإنفاق على الفئات الاجتماعية ذات الأهمية الاستراتيجية، رابطة بذلك توزيع الموارد بشكل متزايد الإذعان السياسي. 

بعد الثورات، اتخذت دول الشرق الأوسط وشمال أفريقيا وجهات مختلفة. فبينما قطعت تونس شوطاً في طريقها نحو تنمية أكثر شمولاً ومشاركة سياسية، يحاول المغرب والأردن الإبقاء على أجزاء من العقد الاجتماعي السابق موفرين توزيعاً رعوياً أبوياً دون مشاركة حقيقية. أما في العقد الاجتماعي الناشئ في مصر، فلا تَعد الحكومة بأكثر من الأمن الفردي والجماعي، وذلك شريطة الإذعان السياسي الكامل. ووقعت كلٌ من ليبيا واليمن وسوريا في حروب أهلية بلا عقود اجتماعية جديدة على مستوى البلاد في الأفق، وفي العراق، فإن البلد يكافح للوصول إلى عقد اجتماعي منذ 2003. بالإضافة إلى ذلك، يؤثر الفرار والهجرة على العقود الاجتماعية في البلدان المجاورة كالأردن وتركيا ولبنان. 

تعمل كل دول الشرق الأوسط وشمال أفريقيا على تصميم أو يوجب عليها تصميم عقود اجتماعية جديدة للتقليل من حالة عدم الاستقرار الحالية ولإتاحة الفرصة لإعادة إعمارٍحقيقي. توضح هذه الورقة وضع مفاهيم إعادة التفاوض بشأن العقود الاجتماعية في بلدان الشرق الأوسط وشمال أفريقيا، وما تعنيه للتعاون الدولي معهم.