European Peace Institute / News

jQuery(document).ready(function($){$("#isloaderfor-hpcytw").fadeOut(300, function () { $(".pagwrap-hpcytw").fadeIn(300);});});

The Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration (DDR) Section of the UN Department of Peace Operations’ (DPO) Office of Rule of Law and Security Institutions (OROLSI) and IPI cohosted a film screening of the documentary There Is Another Way followed by a post-screening discussion with Combatants for Peace on January 30th.

There is Another Way, directed by Stephen Apkon, follows the powerful journey of individuals who reject violence and choose peace, proving that reconciliation is not only possible but essential. Set in Israel and Palestine, following events on the ground over the past year(s), the documentary captures the personal and collective struggles of those embracing nonviolence as a path forward and their journeys of transformation from armed actors to peacebuilders. The film draws on the experiences of Combatants for Peace, a grassroots movement of former Israeli soldiers and Palestinian combatants who now work together, united by the conviction that violence cannot resolve the conflict.

Combatants for Peace emerged in 2006 amid the turmoil of the Second Intifada, when former Israeli soldiers and Palestinian fighters—once sworn enemies—began meeting in secret to challenge their fates and the violent status quo. This movement, grounded in the principles of joint nonviolent struggle, continues to grow as individuals and organizations across the globe unite to reject separation and supremacy. Now, almost 20 years later, the movement has grown beyond its core of ex-combatants and has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize twice.

Opening Remarks:
Thomas Kontogeorgos, Chief of the DDR Section, United Nations Department of Peace Operations (DPO)

Speakers:
Mai Shahin, Palestinian Activist, Combatants for Peace
Iris Gur, Israeli Activist, Combatants for Peace
Stephen Apkon, Director/Producer, There Is Another Way
Chen Alon, Co-Founder, Combatants for Peace (Virtual)
Sulaiman Khatib, Co-Founder, Combatants for Peace (Virtual)

Closing Remarks:
Véronique Dudouet, Senior Advisor Conflict Transformation Research, Berghof Foundation

Moderator:
Adam Lupel, Vice President and COO, International Peace Institute

The post Film Screening: There Is Another Way, Followed by a Discussion with Combatants for Peace appeared first on International Peace Institute.

Gender-sensitive approaches to disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration (DDR) processes tend to focus on the exclusion of women as participants in DDR programs. There has been less attention to including women’s civil society organizations (CSOs) in the design and implementation of DDR programs. One recent effort to involve women’s CSOs in reintegration was a project led by the National Disarmament, Demobilization, and Reintegration Committee (NDDRC) of Cameroon, the International Organization for Migration (IOM), and UN Women. Funded by the Gender and Youth Promotion Initiative (GYPI), this project focused on enhancing women’s roles in the reintegration aspect of DDR. This project highlights both the benefits and the challenges of including women’s CSOs in reintegration processes.

This policy paper analyzes the gendered considerations and lessons learned for engaging women’s CSOs in the implementation of reintegration programming in the Far North of Cameroon. Over the course of the project, the engagement of women’s CSOs has evolved as they received capacity building on reintegration and education on the DDR process in Cameroon. Although the long-term impact of the project remains to be seen, this changing engagement has created a potential entry point to facilitate a shift in societal gender dynamics.

The paper concludes with recommendations aimed at ensuring that reintegration processes are not only more gender-responsive but also lead to more sustainable outcomes:

• Develop a gender strategy as part of the overall DDR strategy
• Establish an infrastructure for systematic and sustained collaboration with civil society
• Invest in women’s CSOs’ long-term capacity to support reintegration
• Communicate details on the operationalization of the DDR process so that CSOs are set up for success
• Consider the role of masculinities when developing DDR gender strategies
• Anticipate and proactively address safety risks facing women’s CSOs supporting reintegration

Download

The post Enhancing Women’s Meaningful Involvement in Reintegration: Lessons from Cameroon appeared first on International Peace Institute.

Activists and researchers have long called attention to the harm UN peacekeepers can cause to populations where they deploy, including through sexual exploitation and abuse (SEA) of civilians in the host community. More recently, researchers have pointed out that some UN peacekeepers also commit sexual harassment (SH) and assault against their peacekeeping colleagues while deployed. Both forms of sexual abuse have similar root causes, including unequal power dynamics and the abuse of power differentials. Nonetheless, SEA and SH fall under different UN policies and mechanisms. This creates confusion for policymakers, UN peacekeepers, and victims or survivors of all backgrounds. It can also undermine prevention efforts, considering that many of the same factors enable both forms of abuse.

This issue brief considers why the divide between SEA and SH has come about and whether it is still useful for UN peacekeeping. It maps existing UN mechanisms for addressing SEA and SH and identifies gaps in their application to various groups of victims. It also examines the influence of mission culture and leadership on SEA and SH.

While there are important differences between SEA against host communities and SH against peacekeepers, the report argues for shifting toward the more holistic concept of sexual exploitation, abuse, and harassment (SEAH). This could allow the UN to better prevent both SEA and SH by addressing the gendered power imbalances that lie at their root. It could also avoid creating false hierarchies of harm and ensure all victims of sexual abuse receive the same level of attention.

Download

The post Connecting Sexual Exploitation and Abuse and Sexual Harassment in UN Peace Operations appeared first on International Peace Institute.

In October 2023, the UN Security Council authorized the Multinational Security Support (MSS) mission in Haiti, led by Kenya, to address escalating gang violence and reestablish security. With initial deployments underway and the mandate extended through 2025, the mission aims to stabilize the country amid a deteriorating humanitarian crisis. However, funding and resource shortages have delayed progress, reflecting broader challenges in supporting non–UN-led missions.

In this context, the International Peace Institute, Stimson Center, and Security Council Report convened a workshop to assess the MSS mission’s progress and future. Participants analyzed operational challenges, funding gaps, and strategies for improving mission effectiveness. The event aimed to provide insights for the Security Council and stakeholders to refine the MSS mission model and explore other models such as a UN-led mission to address Haiti’s urgent security needs.

Key takeaways included the need for sustainable funding and clearer communication with Haitian communities, authorities, and international partners to foster public trust. Participants also highlighted the importance of addressing systemic issues like poverty and inequality to achieve long-term stability while evaluating a potential transition to a UN peacekeeping operation.

Download

The post Emerging Practices in New Mission Models: The Multinational Security Support Mission in Haiti appeared first on International Peace Institute.

jQuery(document).ready(function($){$("#isloaderfor-rmjlvb").fadeOut(300, function () { $(".pagwrap-rmjlvb").fadeIn(300);});});

At COP29, DanChurchAid, Oxford Climate Policy (OCP), and the International Peace Institute (IPI) hosted a side event titled “Innovative Sources for Loss and Damage Funding: Introducing the Climate Solidarity Alliance” on November 15th.

The event explored the role of climate solidarity levies as a potential solution for raising domestic funds and enhancing international collaboration through presentations and a panel debate. Participants emphasized the urgency of scaling up funding to address the growing impacts of climate change and encouraged countries to implement these levies to show solidarity with the most vulnerable communities.

Professor Benito Müller gave a virtual kick-off presentation entitled “Climate Solidarity Levies and Alliance – Walking the Talk”. The proposed alliance would foster international collaboration and inspire countries to establish domestic loss and damage trust funds sourced, inter alia, by domestic solidarity levies tailored to their contexts.

The idea is being considered by the Global Solidarity Levies Task Force, which was launched at COP28 by Kenya, France, and Barbados.

From Fiji to France, participants shared insights and commitments:

In his presentation, Dan Lund, special advisor to the Fijian government, talked about how Cyclone Winston, which in 2016 was the strongest cyclone to make landfall on record, was a turning point for Fiji. Following the immense destructions of Winston, Fiji set up the Climate Relocation of Communities Trust Fund in 2019. Ever since, Fiji has been a key player in advancing the idea of solidarity levies for loss and damage.

“This is the time to act!” said Jean-Christophe Donnellier, the Co-Chair of the Board of the Fund for Responding to Loss and Damage from France. He emphasized the growing political momentum there has been after the task force was established while also acknowledging the challenges of ensuring mechanisms do not harm social equity or national competitiveness.

Yussuf Hussein, Climate Finance Lead at the Executive Office of the President from Kenya, pointed to the task force as a platform to foster dialogue at the highest level. He emphasized the political momentum that the task force had gained since being launched at last year’s COP28. Looking ahead to 2025, Hussein said that the coalition and task force will be presenting concrete initiatives and impact assessments.

Jens Fugl, Chef Advisor in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs from Denmark, continued by underlining how proud Denmark is to be one of the newcomers in the task force. He acknowledged that Denmark is less clear on how to implement the levies but looked forward to exploring the next step: addressing emissions from international sectors like shipping and air travel.

Lillian Chagas, Director for Climate in Ministry of Foreign Affairs from Brazil, reiterated the importance of developing and analyzing new funding mechanisms and underlined that innovative finance sources, such as solidarity levies, will be “one of the main subjects we will propose for COP30.”

After the panel debate, Toeolesulusulu Cedric Pose Salesa Schuster, Minister for Natural Resources, Land, and Environment from Samoa, an island nation severely impacted by sea-level rise from climate change, made a heartfelt plea: “We are losing our land. Are you ready to place your money to really do something or are we going to wait another 10 years?” He also announced a new app, which will calculate the carbon footprint of each travel to and from Samoa, where a carbon offsetting levy is applied. The fund, which these levies will be paid into, will help pay for relocating community, building a sea wall, replanting mangroves, and funding other adaptation and loss and damage needs that Samoans will be facing as climate change continues to pose an existential threat to the small island state.

The event concluded with a unified call for increased collaboration and innovative solutions.

The event showcased not only the potential of solidarity levies but also the power of partnerships to tackle one of the most pressing issues of our time.

The post Innovative Sources for Loss and Damage Funding Discussed at COP29 Side Event appeared first on International Peace Institute.

jQuery(document).ready(function($){$("#isloaderfor-ibvfsb").fadeOut(300, function () { $(".pagwrap-ibvfsb").fadeIn(300);});}); Download Remarks

IPI together with the Panzi Foundation cohosted a Global Leaders Series Event on November 13th featuring Dr. Denis Mukwege, Member of The Elders, Nobel Peace Prize Laureate, global campaigner on conflict-related sexual violence, gynecologist, and Founder and President of the Panzi Hospital and Foundation in the Democratic Republic of Congo. The event was chaired by IPI Vice President and COO, Dr. Adam Lupel.

Dr. Denis Mukwege is an outspoken advocate for the rights of survivors of sexual violence. He was born in the Democratic Republic of Congo and studied medicine in France. He holds a PhD in medical sciences from the Université Libre de Bruxelles where he is a professor. For more than 20 years, Dr. Mukwege has been treating survivors of sexual violence and women with severe gynecological problems at the Panzi Hospital, which he founded in 1999.

In 2018 Dr. Mukwege received the Nobel Peace Prize for his “efforts to end the use of sexual violence as a weapon of war and armed conflict,” together with the Yazidi activist Nadia Murad. His efforts to draw attention to the protection of women and advocate for those responsible for sexual violence to be brought justice make Dr. Mukwege one of the world’s most respected activists on human rights and gender equality.

Dr. Mukwege joined The Elders in 2024 and has recently expanded his work on transitional justice as one of the ways to end the culture of impunity and prevent the recurrence of violence. He is also currently working on promoting transparent and responsible sourcing of minerals to end human rights violations and the illegal exploitation and trade of strategic minerals. This area of work is becoming even more urgent with the green transition that will scale up the demand of these minerals globally.

The post Global Leaders Series Featuring Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Dr. Denis Mukwege appeared first on International Peace Institute.

Resolution 2664, adopted by the UN Security Council on December 9, 2022, was a landmark resolution that created a clear and well-defined humanitarian carve-out for UN sanctions. The application of the carve-out to the 1267 ISIL/al-Qaida regime was particularly important given the far-reaching impact of that regime. It applies across multiple countries, including some of the world’s most challenging humanitarian contexts.

This paper examines how Resolution 2664 has established a humanitarian carve-out within UN sanctions regimes and its impact on facilitating humanitarian access to financial services. It also analyzes the limitations the resolution imposes on asset-freeze measures and specific humanitarian organizations, as well as the challenges of extending the carve-out for the 1267 ISIL/al-Qaida regime beyond its expiration in December 2024.

In order to maintain the positive impact on humanitarian operations of the resolution so far, including in situations impacted by the 1267 ISIL/al-Qaida regime, and to realize the full potential of Resolution 2664 in safeguarding humanitarian action, this paper offers the following recommendations:

• Security Council members should decide a standing application of the humanitarian carve-out for the 1267 ISIL/al-Qaida sanctions regime in December 2024.
• Humanitarian actors should continue to provide member states with evidence of the positive humanitarian impact of Resolution 2664.
• Humanitarian actors should continue to share information with member states and donors about their due-diligence and risk-mitigation practices and any instances of incidental benefits going to listed individuals or entities.
• All stakeholders should ensure that discussions around Resolution 2664 and the carve-out for the 1267 ISIL/al-Qaida regime are fact- and evidence-based.
• Member states should fully implement Resolution 2664 in a harmonized manner and pursue efforts to socialize and operationalize it.
• All stakeholders should pursue and strengthen cross-sector engagement.

Download

The post Safeguarding Humanitarian Action from the Unintended Effects of Sanctions: Resolution 2664 and the 1267 ISIL/al-Qaida Regime appeared first on International Peace Institute.

jQuery(document).ready(function($){$("#isloaderfor-ovepff").fadeOut(300, function () { $(".pagwrap-ovepff").fadeIn(300);});});

IPI in partnership with Sasakawa Peace Foundation USA, cohosted a policy forum on “National Action Plans for National Challenges: Addressing Environmental Crises through the WPS Agenda” on October 24th.

The women, peace, and security (WPS) agenda has recently expanded to include issues outside of “traditional conflict,” such as climate change and environmental disasters. As the agenda has evolved, this expansion has become a key part of contextualizing and applying WPS principles and priorities in different countries. However, despite recognizing that preparing for disasters and climate emergencies are gendered processes, few national action plans (NAPs) on WPS incorporate specific language about disasters. Incorporating disaster preparedness and climate considerations into NAPs is an important way to consider peace through a feminist viewpoint and define it as more than just the absence of violent conflict. NAPs should be tailored to a specific country’s context and integrating disaster risk reduction (DRR) or climate dynamics more broadly can be a powerful way to make an NAP relevant to a country’s internal dynamics. Panelists at the event explored how the WPS agenda has been expanded to include climate and environmental concerns and how different member states contextualize these issues within their NAPs.

Welcoming Remarks:
Adam Lupel, Vice President and COO, International Peace Institute

Opening Remarks:
Shanti Shoji, Director of Programs, Sasakawa Peace Foundation USA
Irene Fellin, Special Representative for Women, Peace and Security, NATO 

Speakers:
Sho Ono, Minister, Human Rights and Humanitarian Affairs, Permanent Mission of Japan to the UN
Katrina Fotovat, Principal Deputy Director, Office of Global Women’s Issues, US Department of State
Japhet Eichel, Associate Expert, Climate, Peace and Security, UN Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs
Maryruth Belsey-Priebe, Co-Founder, aXXelerate
Harriette Williams Bright, WPS Humanitarian Action Compact Lead, UN Women

Interventions from the floor:
Miwako Kitamura, Researcher (specially appointed), International Research Institute of Disaster Science, Tohoku University
Dalal El Taher, Board Member at Syria Civil Defence, The White Helmets (Virtual)

Moderator:
Phoebe Donnelly, Senior Fellow and Head of Women, Peace and Security, International Peace Institute

The post National Action Plans for National Challenges: Addressing Environmental Crises through the WPS Agenda appeared first on International Peace Institute.

jQuery(document).ready(function($){$("#isloaderfor-dsxbjb").fadeOut(300, function () { $(".pagwrap-dsxbjb").fadeIn(300);});});

IPI in partnership with the Berghof Foundation, cohosted a policy forum on “Building Bridges for Nonviolent Change: The Role of Women as Insider Mediators” onn October 23rd. This event was held the day before the UN Security Council open debate on women, peace and security (WPS) and focused on the vital need to increase women’s participation in formal mediation processes.

This policy forum exposed multiple stakeholders in New York to the crucial work of women as informal bridge-builders in conflict situations, and discussed strategies for including their expertise in formal mediation processes. At the event, the Berghof Foundation launched research reports and a policy brief on the role of women mediators in recent protests in Venezuela, Thailand, and Iraq. These reports offer specific and actionable recommendations for how international donors and practitioners can fulfill capacity building and support needs to empower these women to sustain and deepen their engagement, thereby expanding the potential for achieving peaceful change and conflict transformation.

Opening Remarks:
Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein, President and CEO, International Peace Institute
H.E. Jacqueline O’Neill, Canada’s Ambassador for Women, Peace and Security
H.E. Pascale Christine Baeriswyl, Permanent Representative of Switzerland to the UN
H.E. Arlene Tickner, Ambassador-At-Large for Gender Issues and Global Feminist Politics, Government of Colombia

Speakers:
Rachel Gasser, Senior Adviser, Negotiation and Mediation Support, Berghof Foundation
Isabella Picón, Activist and Researcher (Venezuela)
Nang Raw Zahkung, Peace Practitioner and Facilitator (Myanmar)
Tahani Abbas Ali Balalelsheib, Women Activist and Human Rights Defender (Sudan)
Sarah Taylor, Policy Specialist, Women, Peace and Security and Resilience, UN Women

Moderator:
Phoebe Donnelly, Senior Fellow and Head of Women, Peace and Security, International Peace Institute

The post Building Bridges for Nonviolent Change: The Role of Women as Insider Mediators appeared first on International Peace Institute.

jQuery(document).ready(function($){$("#isloaderfor-apwxjq").fadeOut(300, function () { $(".pagwrap-apwxjq").fadeIn(300);});}); Download the Report

IPI in partnership with the Institute for Economics and Peace (IEP), the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, and the Permanent Mission of Denmark to the UN, cohosted the launch event of the 2024 Multilateralism Index on October 17th.

IPI and IEP launched the Multilateralism Index in September 2022. Two years later, we launched a refined and updated version of the index to assess changes in international cooperation over the decade between 2013 and 2023. By providing a quantitative assessment of the multilateral system, the Index provides an analytic tool to inform decision-making and guide political attention.

This launch event presented the key findings of the 2024 Multilateralism Index. It also considered concrete ways to create a stronger, more nimble multilateral system.

Opening remarks:
H.E. James Larsen, Permanent Representative of Australia to the UN
Erik Laursen, Deputy Permanent Representative of the Kingdom of Denmark to the UN

Presentation of the 2024 Multilateralism Index:
Albert Trithart, Editor and Research Fellow, International Peace Institute

Panelists:
H.E. Maritza Chan, Permanent Representative of Costa Rica to the UN
Minh-Thu Pham, Co-founder and CEO at Project Starling, Nonresident Scholar at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Moderator:
Adam Lupel, Vice President and COO, International Peace Institute

Closing remarks:
Volker Lehmann, Senior Policy Analyst, The Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES) New York Office

The post Tracking the Past to Chart the Future Through the 2024 Multilateralism Index appeared first on International Peace Institute.

As part of Geneva Peace Week 2024, IPI in partnership with the Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, Switzerland, the Geneva Centre for Security Policy (GCSP), International Gender Champions, the Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue (HD), and the Berghof Foundation cohosted a peace panel on the topic of “A Feminist Peace Built by All: Pathways to Inclusive Visions of Peace” on October 15th.

Despite well-established normative frameworks for gender equality within the UN system, such as the WPS agenda, challenges still exist to achieving the vision of a sustainable and just peace. The theme of the 2024 open debate on WPS in the UN Security Council will focus on inclusive peacemaking by highlighting women’s roles in mediation especially in a changing geopolitical and technological environment.

This event provided a moment to reflect on these issues in advance of the open debate on WPS and the 24th anniversary of UN Security Council Resolution 1325. Panelists analyzed and identified strategies to mitigate these challenges to fully realize an inclusive peace. The event further connected different audiences in discussing how to build an inclusive feminist peace, because these efforts cannot be siloed across different agendas and agencies; they are strongest when they connect feminist actors across different sectors and locations.

Welcoming Remarks:
Thomas Greminger, Executive Director of the Geneva Centre for Security Policy
Opening Remarks
Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein, President and CEO, International Peace Institute

Speakers:
Madeleine Rees, Former Secretary-General of the Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom (WILPF) and co-chair of the WPS Impact Group in Geneva
Ingrid Münch, Mediation Support Officer, Gender-Responsive and Inclusive Peacemaking, Co-lead of the Gender and Inclusion Team, Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue
Callum Watson, Gender Coordinator, Small Arms Survey
Victoria Sandino Simanca Herrera, feminist leader, former Senator of the Republic of Colombia, negotiator during the peace process in Colombia, and ex-combatant of the FARC-EP

Moderator:
Phoebe Donnelly, Senior Fellow and Head of Women, Peace, and Security Program, International Peace Institute

Closing Remarks:
Ambassador OIKE Atsuyuki, Permanent Representative of Japan to the United Nations Office at Geneva

The post A Feminist Peace Built by All: Pathways to Inclusive Visions of Peace appeared first on International Peace Institute.

jQuery(document).ready(function($){$("#isloaderfor-eldzij").fadeOut(300, function () { $(".pagwrap-eldzij").fadeIn(300);});});

On October 14th, IPI President Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein delivered the Peace Message at the Opening Ceremony of the 11th annual Geneva Peace Week at the Maison de la Paix in Geneva, Switzerland. This year’s theme was “What is Peace?” Speakers and participants sought to unravel the essence of peace and discover new pathways towards its attainment.

Speaking to the assembled delegates, President Al Hussein emphasized that peace is imperiled by the world’s current trajectory “toward the savagery of unconfined warfare, where being a civilian offers oneself no protection at all.”

However, he draws inspiration from the remarkable efforts of Israeli and Palestinian lawyers and activists behind the A Land for All initiative: “They are doing something rather remarkable. They seem to have pinned down not just a visionary but also a practical equation for achieving a just and lasting peace to the Middle East conflict.”

Read full remarks here >>

The post IPI President Delivers Peace Message at the Opening Ceremony of Geneva Peace Week 2024 appeared first on International Peace Institute.

Figure 1: Results of the Multilateralism Index 2024

Figure 2: Percentage of indicators that improved and deteriorated, by dimension, 2013–2023

There are growing calls to transform the multilateral system, which is widely seen as being in crisis. Yet solving the crisis of multilateralism requires understanding what that crisis entails. What parts of the multilateral system are in crisis, and what parts are still functioning? Where is commitment to multilateralism flagging, and where does it remain strong? Where is multilateral action failing to translate into concrete results, and where is it delivering? Who is being left out of multilateral engagement, and who is being included? And what are the trends over time?

To help answer these questions, the International Peace Institute (IPI) and the Institute for Economics and Peace (IEP) developed the Multilateralism Index. This 2024 edition of the Index assesses changes in international cooperation between 2013 and 2023 across five domains: Peace and Security, Human Rights, Climate Action, Public Health, and Trade. Each domain is evaluated across three dimensions: Participation, Performance, and Inclusivity. Looking at each of these dimensions provides several broad takeaways:

• Participation: The Index does not find a major drop-off in participation by states in the multilateral system. In fact, participation increased across all domains except trade. This signals that member states remain engaged in the system, even if the nature of this engagement has shifted from cooperation toward contestation. At the same time, due to limitations in the indicators available, these improvements in participation should not necessarily be interpreted as a broad-based increase in commitment to multilateral action.
• Performance: Performance is the one dimension where the multilateral system saw a clear decline across most of the domains. The biggest decline was in peace and security. Human rights and climate action also saw significant declines. These declines may indicate that some global crises are outstripping the multilateral system’s ability to respond. At the same time, these shortcomings are not solely failures of multilateralism, as performance in many areas also depends domestic action by individual states. Moreover, despite these shortcomings, the gears of the multilateral system are continuing to turn.
• Inclusivity: Broad improvements in the Index’s inclusivity dimension point to two trends: the steady growth in the number of NGOs engaging with various parts of the UN system and the increase in women’s representation across many UN bodies. Limitations in the indicators available make it more difficult to assess progress in other areas, including geographic inclusivity and more substantive inclusivity of women beyond their formal representation at the UN.

Download

The post Multilateralism Index 2024 appeared first on International Peace Institute.

jQuery(document).ready(function($){$("#isloaderfor-vdatrg").fadeOut(300, function () { $(".pagwrap-vdatrg").fadeIn(300);});});

On October 8th, IPI in partnership with the Permanent Mission of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the UN, cohosted a special preview screening of THE VETO, a short documentary film, followed by a panel discussion.

For close to eighty years, the UN Security Council’s permanent member veto power has been the subject of constant debate, both within the UN and without.

The veto itself isn’t going away—it’s “veto-proof.” But when vetoes are cast in the face of genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity, obligations under international law and the UN Charter must be considered. Such uses have led to massive loss of life, displacement of millions, and the multilateral order pushed to a breaking point.

The film, featuring leading global experts, puts aside assertions of the impossibility of change and explores real paths to breaking the Security Council deadlock.

The event video features only the trailer of the documentary. Production of the final film is forthcoming.

Welcoming remarks:
H.E. Mr. Christian Wenaweser, Permanent Representative of Liechtenstein to the UN

Conversation following the film:
Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein, President and CEO of the International Peace Institute
Professor Jennifer Trahan, NYU Center for Global Affairs; author, Existing Legal Limits to Security Council Veto Power in the Face of Atrocity Crimes (CUP 2020)
Tim Slade, Independent Filmmaker, Director and Producer of THE VETO

The post Film Screening of “The Veto” appeared first on International Peace Institute.

The African Union Transition Mission in Somalia (ATMIS), which replaced AMISOM in 2022, is a UN peacekeeping mission with the mandate to support the Somali Security Forces (SSF) in combating al-Shabaab and securing the country. As ATMIS is set to conclude by December 2024, discussions are underway for a follow-on mission, the African Union Support and Stabilization Mission in Somalia (AUSSOM), to ensure continued support and prevent a security vacuum.

In this context, the International Peace Institute, Stimson Center, and Security Council Report convened a workshop to assess the ATMIS transition and future security arrangements in Somalia. The event aimed to discuss the complex security environment in Somalia, explore lessons learned, and consider strategies to ensure a seamless transition to AUSSOM while maintaining regional stability.

Key takeaways from the workshop included the need to secure predictable and sustainable funding for the new mission, strengthen the Somali security forces, and ensure the transition aligns with on-the-ground realities. Participants also highlighted the importance of preventing a security vacuum, strengthening partnerships between the African Union, United Nations, and Somalia, and focusing on long-term stabilization efforts.

Download

The post ATMIS Transition and Post-ATMIS Security Arrangements in Somalia appeared first on International Peace Institute.

UN peacekeeping operations have a vital role to play in protecting and promoting civic space. Shrinking civic space undermines human rights, generates instability, and impacts the ability of missions to execute their mandates. Supporting civic space is also connected to core areas of missions’ work, including support to political processes, the protection of civilians, and the promotion of human rights.

This paper identifies how missions are contributing to the protection and promotion of civic space and the obstacles they face in doing so. It identifies how civic space has been reflected in mission mandates and analyzes whether the inclusion of explicit language on civic space has an impact on the work undertaken by missions. It also explores how missions have sought to protect and promote civic space and examines the challenges they face when engaging in these activities.

Despite these challenges, the paper concludes that peacekeeping missions have unique advantages in protecting and promoting civic space, such as their ability to protect civilians and connect civic space initiatives to broader political mandates. Yet their efforts are not always part of a common strategy for promoting and protecting civic space. The paper offers four considerations to help guide future exploration of the topic:

• Policymakers should consider the utility of adding explicit language on civic space to mission mandates and weigh the risks and benefits.
• Missions should consider how to connect the dots between their different efforts related to civic space.
• Missions that have implemented more systematic approaches to monitoring civic space should gather lessons on whether and how this monitoring has impacted their ability to respond to civic space restrictions.
• The UN should improve reporting on the collective impact of activities related to civic space to illustrate the role missions play and their comparative advantages.

Download

The post The Protection and Promotion of Civic Space in UN Peacekeeping Operations appeared first on International Peace Institute.

jQuery(document).ready(function($){$("#isloaderfor-cucmir").fadeOut(300, function () { $(".pagwrap-cucmir").fadeIn(300);});});

IPI and G20 Social cohosted a policy forum on September 26th entitled “The G20 and the Reform of Global Economic Governance Structures.”

Speaker interventions centered around the debate on the Reform of Global Economic Governance Structures. The discussion focused on: IMF Governance Reforms; gender and regional balance in international financial institutions; the role of MDBs in global governance and the “G20 Roadmap for Better, Bigger, and More Effective MDBs;” and the Global civil society agenda for new global governance. The event also focused on key points regarding Brazil’s G20 Social Initiative and how it will achieve its goal of increasing nongovernmental stakeholder participation in the work of the G20.

Welcoming Remarks:
Adam Lupel, Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, International Peace Institute

Opening Remarks:
Fernanda Santiago, Special Advisor to the Minister of Finance, Counselor on the Superior Council of the Office of the Attorney General, and Attorney General of the Ministry of Finance of Brazil

Speakers:
Flávio Luís Pazeto, First Secretary of the Brazilian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and responsible for the general coordination of the G20
Bruno Coelho Saraiva, Alternate Executive Director, Brazil IMF Office
Karin Costa Vazquez, General Coordinator for Multilateral Development Banks Reform on the Finance Track, Brazilian Ministry of Finance
Cristina Duarte, Under-Secretary-General and Special Adviser on Africa, UN Office of the Special Adviser on Africa
Jeroo Billimoria, Founder of One Family Foundation, Co-founder of Catalyst 2030

Moderator:
Tatiana Berringer, Coordinator of the G20 Social on the Finance Track, Brazilian G20 Presidency, and Senior Lecturer of International Relations at Federal University of ABC, Brazil

The post The G20 and the Reform of Global Economic Governance Structures appeared first on International Peace Institute.

jQuery(document).ready(function($){$("#isloaderfor-bckdtq").fadeOut(300, function () { $(".pagwrap-bckdtq").fadeIn(300);});});

IPI in partnership with the Kofi Annan Foundation, Open Society Foundations, and International Crisis Group cohosted the second Kofi Annan Lecture Series on September 26th featuring Maria Ressa, 2021 Nobel Peace Prize Laureate and CEO of Rappler.

Maria Ressa has shown exemplary global leadership on critical issues facing today’s world—including combatting disinformation and promoting and advocating for democracy to support peace.

For her courage and journalistic integrity, Maria has received numerous accolades. In October 2021, she was one of two journalists awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in recognition of her “efforts to safeguard freedom of expression, which is a precondition for democracy and lasting peace.”

In 2022, she was appointed by the UN Secretary-General to the Leadership Panel of the Internet Governance Forum and serves as its Vice-Chair.

She is a Professor of Professional Practice at the Institute of Global Politics at Columbia University’s School of International and Public Affairs, where she leads projects related to artificial intelligence and democracy.

She has also authored several books, including her most recent book: How to Stand Up to a Dictator, which has been translated into more than 20 languages.

The series provides an opportunity for leaders to set out new ideas and agendas for international cooperation and diplomacy, recalling Secretary-General Annan’s role in championing rules-based cooperation and sustainable solutions.

Welcoming/Opening Remarks:
Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein, President and CEO of the International Peace Institute
Elhadj As Sy, Chair of the Board of Directors of the Kofi Annan Foundation
Binaifer Nowrojee, President of the Open Society Foundations

Keynote Speaker:
Maria Ressa, 2021 Nobel Peace Prize Laureate and CEO of Rappler

Closing Remarks:
Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein, President and CEO of the International Peace Institute
Comfort Ero, President and CEO of International Crisis Group

The post Second Kofi Annan Lecture Features Maria Ressa, 2021 Nobel Peace Prize Laureate and CEO of Rappler appeared first on International Peace Institute.

Established in 2013 by the UN Security Council, the United Nations Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in Mali (MINUSMA) aimed to stabilize the situation in northern Mali, support the political transition, protect civilians, and promote human rights amidst ongoing conflict and instability. The mission’s mandate evolved over its ten-year tenure to address the changing political and security landscape, leading to its withdrawal at the request of the Malian government in 2023.

In this context, the International Peace Institute (IPI), the Stimson Center, and Security Council Report, with support from the German Federal Foreign Office and the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, organized a workshop to discuss takeaways learned from MINUSMA’s ten-year presence in Mali. Held on June 13, 2024, the workshop brought together UN officials, member states, civil society stakeholders, and independent experts to assess successes and challenges related to the mandate, with the objective to draw lessons from MINUSMA’s experience that could ensure more realistic, effective, and achievable mandates in future UN peace operations.

Key takeaways from the discussion include recognition of MINUSMA’s crucial role in supporting the 2015 Peace and Reconciliation Agreement, protecting civilians, and stabilizing urban centers. However, the mission faced significant challenges, particularly due to the lack of a stable peace to maintain and the volatile political environment following two coups. Despite its efforts to adapt, MINUSMA struggled with host-state consent, resource constraints, and the complexities of an asymmetric threat environment. The lessons learned from MINUSMA point to the importance of political consensus, multistakeholder partnerships, and realistic alignment between mandates and resources for the success of future peacekeeping missions.

Download

jQuery(document).ready(function($){$("#isloaderfor-hoksyy").fadeOut(300, function () { $(".pagwrap-hoksyy").fadeIn(300);});});

IPI, Keio University, National Institute for Environmental Studies, and Institute for Global Environmental Studies, with support from the Government of Finland, Stockholm Environment Institute, Global Forum for National SDG Advisory Bodies, Japan Foundation, and Ministry of the Environment of Japan cohosted a policy forum on July 10th on the topic of “Exploring Synergies and Trade-Offs for Transformations to the SDGs and Beyond.”

According to the 2023 Global Sustainable Development Report (GSDR), bringing about the transformation required to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) requires facilitating synergies and eliminating trade-offs between different SDGs. Understanding these synergies and trade-offs is critical to assessing progress toward the SDGs through voluntary national reviews and to considering global goals beyond 2030.

The event introduced ongoing research on these synergies and trade-offs conducted by some of the institutions where members of the Independent Group of Scientists that drafted the 2023 GSDR are based. Implementation of the SDGs relies on localized actions and local contexts. Therefore, case studies and empirical data on context-specific synergies and trade-offs are critical for drawing lessons on how transformation takes place. Speakers discussed examples from Japan, Finland, and Sweden, and called for collaboration and partnerships on accelerating progress toward the SDGs by facilitating synergies and eliminating trade-offs.

Opening Remarks:
Yutaka Matsuzawa, Vice-Minister for Global Environmental Affairs (Ministry of the Environment of Japan）

Speakers:
Norichika Kanie, Professor at the Graduate School of Media and Governance, Keio University, Japan
Mustafa Moinuddin, Fellow, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES)
Eeva Furman, Secretary General of the Finnish Commission on Sustainable Development
Ivonne Lobos Alva, Stockholm Environment Institute

Video Message:
Kazuhiko Takeuchi, President, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Japan

Moderator:
Jimena Leiva Roesch, IPI Director of Global Initiatives and Head of Peace, Climate, and Sustainable Development