Feed aggregator

Le Maroc a passé plus d'une décennie à remodeler son football, mais l'organisation de la CAN 2025 permettra-t-elle au pays de mettre fin à 50 ans d'attente pour remporter le trophée ?

Le Maroc a passé plus d'une décennie à remodeler son football, mais l'organisation de la CAN 2025 permettra-t-elle au pays de mettre fin à 50 ans d'attente pour remporter le trophée ?

Auf der Autobahn nahe Teano in Italien kommt es zu einer grossen Explosion. Nach einem Auffahrunfall gerät ein mit Flüssiggas beladener Tanklastwagen in Brand. Kurz darauf explodiert er.

Euronews: Karácsonyi misét tartottak a párizsi Notre-Dame-ban csütörtökön (12. 25.). A székesegyház kiégett a 2019-es tűzvészben, de 2024 decemberében teljesen felújítva nyitotta meg kapuit. Azóta ez a második karácsonyi mise a katedrálisban.

In Zukunft fahren KI-gesteuerte Robotaxis elektrisch durch wieder auf Menschen ausgerichtete Megacitys. Da, wo die Rushhours bleiben, kürzen Flugtaxis den Weg zum Ziel ab. Autos werden nicht verschwinden, aber luxuriöser und weniger. Eine Vision.

Ab dem 26. Dezember lockt Flumserberg mit 22 km Pisten, Winterwanderwegen und Festtagsspecials wie Yoga und Alpakafahrten. Sprecherin Katja Wildhaber (44) verspricht Sonne, Schneespass und kulinarische Highlights.

Blutige Weihnachten: Bei einem Streit in Basel wurden zwei junge Männer durch Messerstiche und ein weiterer Beteiligter ganz ohne Klinge verletzt. Die Kriminalpolizei sucht Zeugen, um den genauen Hergang zu klären.

In der Nacht auf Freitag spuckte US-Präsident Donald Trump auf Truth Social wieder Gift und Galle. Der Republikaner schoss gegen politische Gegner und äusserte sich zum verurteilten Sexualstraftäter Jeffrey Epstein.

A nemzeti tanács az idei évben 113 törvényt hagyott jóvá. Ezekből 21-et gyorsított eljárásban hoztak tető alá a képviselők. A szóban forgó jogszabályok közül 97-et a kormány terjesztett elő, míg 16-ot a képviselők – derült ki a parlament honlapján közzétett statisztikákból.

Die norwegische Kronprinzessin spricht in einem Interview über die Belastung für ihre Familie. Marius Borg Høiby wird sexueller Missbrauch in mehreren Fällen vorgeworfen.

Frisch verliebt oder schon länger zusammen – zahlreiche Sport-Stars schwelgen im Jahr 2025 im Liebesglück. Eine Auswahl.

Der Wettskandal im türkischen Fussball weitet sich immer mehr aus. Jetzt kommt es zu weiteren Inhaftierungen. Auch ein früherer Spitzenfunktionär von Galatasaray ist darunter.

Spezielle Immobilien haben unsere Leserinnen und Leser 2025 bewegt – und auch verärgert. Es geht um historische Villen, riesige Schlösser und Luxus-Wohnungen. Wir zeigen die sieben interessantesten Geschichten aus dem laufenden Jahr.

Von wegen nichts als Christbaumkugeln und Weihnachtslieder: Rund um den Globus wird Weihnachten auf die unterschiedlichsten Arten gefeiert – mit Traditionen, die uns oft staunen lassen. Doch wie vertraut bist du mit diesen Bräuchen? Teste hier dein Wissen!

A Szlovák Hidrometeorológiai Intézet (SHMÚ) előrejelzése szerint enyhén felhős időjárás várható pénteken (12. 26.), de helyenként átmenetileg felszakadozhat a felhőzet. Délelőtt elvétve köd vagy alacsony szintű rétegfelhőzet alakulhat ki. Délután keleten elvétve gyenge havazás fordulhat elő.

Das Wetter ist perfekt, der Alltag weit weg. Jetzt fehlt nur noch der Schnee! Blick-Reporter Sandro Zulian ist heute im Skigebiet Flumserberg unterwegs.

Die südkoreanische Staatsanwaltschaft fordert zehn Jahre Haft für Ex-Präsident Yoon Suk Yeol. Ein Urteil wird im Januar erwartet.

Das Jahr 2025 geht dem Ende zu. Viel ist passiert und denkwürdige Momente wurden auf Video festgehalten. Über die Festtage zeigt dir Blick nochmals die Bilder, die am meisten bewegten.

By CIVICUS
Dec 26 2025 (IPS)

 
CIVICUS discusses Generation Z-led protests in Bulgaria with Zahari Iankov, senior legal expert at the Bulgarian Centre for Not-for-Profit Law, a civil society organisation that advocates for participation and human rights.

Zahari Iankov

Bulgaria recently experienced its largest protests since the 1990s, driven largely by young people frustrated with corruption and institutional decay. What began as opposition to budget measures quickly escalated into broader demands for systemic change. The prime minister’s resignation has triggered Bulgaria’s seventh election since 2021, but whether this cycle of repeated elections will finally address fundamental questions about institutional integrity, informal power structures and the enduring influence of the oligarchy remains to be seen.

What sparked recent protests?

Bulgaria has been in a prolonged political crisis since 2020, when mass protests first erupted against corruption and state capture. Although they didn’t immediately lead to a resignation, these protests marked the beginning of a cycle of repeated elections and unstable governments. Since 2021, Bulgaria has held several parliamentary elections, and no political settlement has lasted.

The latest protests, which erupted on 1 December, have probably been the largest since the early 1990s, during Bulgaria’s transition from communism to democracy. They were initially sparked by a controversial 2026 budget that raised taxes to fund public sector wages, but while economic concerns played a role, the protests were primarily centres on values. People reacted to the fact that democratic rules were being openly disregarded and governance was increasingly being shaped by informal powers and personal interests.

Several incidents reinforced the perception that institutions were being systematically undermined. One symbolic moment was the treatment of student representatives during parliamentary debates about education, including proposals for mandatory religious education. Members of parliament publicly shamed student council representatives, which many people saw as emblematic of a broader contempt for citizen participation and government accountability.

Other cases reinforced this perception: environmental laws were weakened without debate, key oversight bodies were left inactive for over a year and proposals that threatened freedom of expression were introduced, and only withdrawn following public backlash. Together, these incidents created a sense that institutions were being hollowed out.

The budget acted as a trigger, but public anger had been building for months. Throughout the government’s short mandate, there was a clear pattern of sidelining public participation and bypassing parliamentary procedures. Laws were rushed through committees in seconds, major reforms were proposed without consultation and controversial decisions were taken at moments designed to avoid opposition.

What made these protests different from previous ones?

One striking difference was the speed and scale of the mobilisation. What began as a protest linked to budget concerns quickly turned into huge demonstrations involving tens of thousands of people. Estimates suggest that between 100,000 and 150,000 people gathered in Sofia, the capital, during the largest protest. For such a small country, this was impressive. Also unlike previous mobilisations, these protests spread well beyond Sofia to many cities across the country, something unusual for Bulgaria’s highly centralised political system.

Another important difference was the strong presence of young people, which led to the protests being described as Gen Z protests. While young people also played a role in big protest movements in 2013 and 2020, this time the generational identity was much more visible and explicitly embraced. Young people were central as communicators as well as participants. Social media campaigns, humour and memes played a significant role in spreading information and mobilising support.

Additionally, these protests were not driven by a single political party. Although one party provided logistical support in Sofia, the extent of participation and the geographic spread made clear this was a broad social mobilisation, not a partisan campaign.

What role did organised civil society groups play in sustaining the protests?

There were a couple of civil society groups that were involved in the organisation of protests, but organised civil society’s main role was not in mobilising but in providing crucial long-term support. For years, civil society groups and investigative journalists have documented corruption, challenged harmful laws and mobilised public awareness around environmental and rule-of-law issues.

As traditional media came under increasing control, civil society helped fill the gap by exposing abuses and explaining complex issues in accessible ways. This helped counter the narrative that ‘nothing ever changes’ and empowered people to believe protest could make a difference.

At the same time, attempts by politicians to discredit or intimidate civil society organisations, including proposals resembling laws to stigmatise civil society as foreign agent, underscored how influential civil society has become.

Who are the figures at the centre of public anger, and what do they represent?

The two key figures are Boyko Borissov and Delyan Peevski, who represent two different but deeply entrenched forms of political power. A former mayor of Sofia and prime minister who has dominated Bulgarian politics for over a decade, Borissov retains a loyal voter base despite major scandals, and has repeatedly returned to power through elections. He built his image on strongman rhetoric and visible policing actions.

Peevski is a different figure. Sanctioned under the Magnitsky Act — a US law targeting people involved in corruption and human rights abuses — he has never enjoyed broad public support but wields enormous informal influence. Despite leading a political party, he operates largely behind the scenes. Over the years, he has been linked to deep penetration of the judiciary, influence over regulatory bodies and media control. His role in governance has become increasingly visible despite his party not formally being part of the ruling coalition.

Together, these two figures embody what protesters see as the fundamental problem: a ‘mafia-style’ system of governance, where access, decision-making and protection depend on proximity to powerful individuals rather than transparent institutional processes.

Does the government’s resignation address the underlying problems?

This was a political response, but it does not resolve the structural issues that triggered the protests. Bulgaria’s institutions remain weak, key oversight bodies continue operating with expired mandates and the judiciary continues to face serious credibility problems.

What happens next will depend largely on voter participation and political renewal. Turnout in recent elections has fallen below 40 per cent, undermining any legitimacy claims and making vote-buying and clientelism easier. Mass turnout would significantly reduce the influence of these practices and could be our only hope for real change.

However, lasting change will require action to restore institutional independence, reform the judiciary and ensure regulatory bodies function properly. Otherwise, any new government risks being undermined by the same informal power structures that brought people out onto the streets.

GET IN TOUCH
Website
Facebook
Instagram
LinkedIn
Zahari Iankov/LinkedIn

SEE ALSO
Anti-euro protests continue; arrest of Varna mayor sparks protests CIVICUS Monitor 28.Jul.2025
Unprecedented protests in Bulgaria’s public media CIVICUS Monitor 27.May.2025
Bulgaria: stuck in a loop? CIVICUS Lens 24.Oct.2022

 

Follow @IPSNewsUNBureau
!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],p=/^http:/.test(d.location)?'http':'https';if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src=p+'://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js';fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document, 'script', 'twitter-wjs');  

Geheime Gesprächsprotokolle enthüllen: Russlands Präsident Wladimir Putin sprach bereits 2001 mit dem damaligen US-Präsidenten George W. Bush über die Ukraine. Schon damals drohte er mit Krieg.