Africa

Credit: Denis Balibouse/Reuters via Gallo Images

By Samuel King
BRUSSELS, Belgium, Feb 6 2026 (IPS)

In early January, an emergency UN Security Council meeting on Venezuela followed a familiar path of paralysis. Members clashed over the US government’s abduction of Nicolás Maduro, with many warning it set a dangerous precedent, but no resolution came.

This wasn’t exceptional. In 2024, permanent members cast eight vetoes, the highest since 1986. In 2025, the Council adopted only 44 resolutions, the lowest since 1991. Deep divisions prevented meaningful responses to Gaza and to conflicts in Myanmar, Sudan and Ukraine.

Designed in 1945, the Security Council is the UN’s most powerful body, tasked with maintaining international peace and security, but also crucially protecting the privileged position of the most powerful states following the Second World War. Of its 15 members, 10 are elected for two-year terms, but five – China, France, Russia, the UK and the USA – are permanent and have veto powers. A single veto can block any resolution, regardless of global support. The Council’s anachronistic structure reflects and reproduces outdated power dynamics.

Since launching its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, Russia has continually used its veto despite breaching the UN Charter. On Gaza, the USA vetoed four ceasefire proposals before the Council passed Resolution 2728 in March 2024, 171 days into Israel’s assault. By then over 10,000 people had been killed.

When the Council is gridlocked, it means more suffering on the ground. Civilian protection fails, peace processes stall and human rights crimes go unpunished.

The case for reform

Since the UN was established, the number of member states has quadrupled and the global population has grown from 2.5 to 8 billion. But former colonial powers that represent a minority of the world’s population still hold permanent seats while entire continents remain unrepresented.

Calls for reform have been made for decades, but they face a formidable challenge: reform requires amendment of the UN Charter, a process that needs a favourable two-thirds General Assembly vote, ratification by two-thirds of member states and approval from all five permanent Council members.

The African Union has advanced the clearest demand. Emphasising historical justice and equal power for the global south, it calls for the Council to be expanded to 26 members, with Africa holding two permanent seats with full veto rights and five non-permanent seats.

India has been particularly vocal in demanding a greater role on a reformed Council. The G4 – Brazil, Germany, India and Japan – has proposed expansion to 25 or 26 members with six new permanent seats: two for Africa, two for Asia and the Pacific, one for Latin America and the Caribbean and one for Western Europe. New permanent members would gain veto powers after a 10-to-15-year review period.

Uniting for Consensus, a group led by Italy that includes Argentina, Mexico, Pakistan and South Korea, opposes the creation of new permanent seats, arguing this would simply expand an existing oligarchy. Instead, they propose longer rotating terms and greater representation for underrepresented regions.

The five permanent members show varying degrees of openness to reform. France and the UK support expansion with veto powers, while the USA supports adding permanent African seats but without a veto. China backs new African seats, but virulently opposes Japan’s permanent membership, while Russia supports reform in principle but warns against making the Council ‘too broad’.

These positions reflect competition and a desire to prevent rivals gaining power. Current permanent members fear diluted influence, while states that see themselves as rising powers want the status and sway that comes with Council membership.

Adding new members could help redress the imbalance against the global south, but wouldn’t necessarily make the Council more effective, accountable and committed to protecting human lives and human rights, particularly if more states get veto powers.

A French-Mexican initiative from 2015 offers a more modest path: voluntary veto restraint in mass atrocity situations. The proposal asks permanent members to refrain from vetoes in cases of crimes against humanity, genocide and war crimes. This complements efforts to increase the political costs of vetoes, including the Code of Conduct signed by 121 states and General Assembly Resolution 76/262, which requires debate whenever a veto is cast.

New challenges

Now a new challenge has emerged from the Trump administration, which recently launched the Board of Peace at the World Economic Forum in Davos. This has mutated from a temporary institution set up by a Security Council resolution to govern over Gaza into a seemingly permanent one that envisages a broader global role under Trump’s personal control. Its membership skews toward authoritarian regimes, and human rights don’t get a mention in its draft charter.

Instead of legitimising the Board of Peace, efforts should focus on Security Council reform to address the two fundamental flaws of representation and veto power. Accountability and transparency must also be enhanced. Civil society must have space to engage with the Council and urge states to prioritise the UN Charter over self-interest.

Some momentum exists. The September 2024 Pact for the Future committed leaders to developing a consolidated reform model. Since 2008, formal intergovernmental negotiations have addressed membership expansion, regional representation, veto reform and working methods. These became more transparent in 2023, with sessions recorded online, allowing civil society to track proceedings and challenge blocking states.

However, reform efforts faced entrenched interests, geopolitical rivalries and institutional inertia even before Trump started causing chaos. The UN faces a demanding 2026, forced to make funding cuts amid a liquidity crisis while choosing the next secretary-general. In such circumstances, it’s tempting to defer difficult decisions.

But the reform case is clear, as is the choice: act to make the Council fit for purpose or accept continuing paralysis and irrelevance, allowing it to be supplanted by Trump’s Board of Peace.

Samuel King is a researcher with the Horizon Europe-funded research project ENSURED: Shaping Cooperation for a World in Transition at CIVICUS: World Alliance for Citizen Participation.

For interviews or more information, please contact research@civicus.org

 

Follow @IPSNewsUNBureau
!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],p=/^http:/.test(d.location)?'http':'https';if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src=p+'://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js';fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document, 'script', 'twitter-wjs');  

Credit: United Nations

By Thalif Deen
UNITED NATIONS, Feb 6 2026 (IPS)

The current UN financial crisis, described as the worst in the 80-year-old history of the world body, triggers the question: is the US using its financial clout defaulting in its arrears and its assessed contributions to precipitate the collapse of the UN?

If the crisis continues, the UN headquarters will be forced to shut down by August, ahead of the annual meeting of world leaders in September this year, according to a report in the New York Times last week, quoting unnamed senior UN officials.

But apparently there is still hope for survival —judging by a report coming out of the White House.

Asked about the current state of finances, UN Spokesperson Stephane Dujarric told reporters February 5: “We’ve seen cuts by the United States. We’ve seen cuts by European countries over the last year. And every day, I talk to you about what happens when there’s no money, right?”

“Rations are being reduced, health care not being delivered. So, I mean it’s pretty clear. In terms of the Secretariat, should it come to pass, it will impact our ability to run meetings in this building, to do the political work we do, the peacekeeping work that we do”, he pointed out.

About hopes of a possible resolution, he said “I do also have to say that we saw the reports…earlier this week – of the President of the United States signing a budget bill, which includes funding for the United Nations”.

“We welcome that, and we will stay in contact with the US over the coming days and weeks to monitor the transfers of those monies,” said Dujarric.

Meanwhile, in an interview with IPS last week, Sanam Naraghi Anderlini, Founder/CEO, International Civil Society Action Network (ICAN), said the potential financial collapse of the UN is depressing and yet so indicative of these times, when leadership everywhere is devoid of any sense of responsibility and has no care for the future.

They are the antithesis of the UN’s founding fathers and mothers, who, having experienced the hell of war and destitution first hand, committed themselves to creating a global peace and security architecture with the goal of preventing such hell for us – the future generation – their descendants, she argued.

“We all know that the UN system has never been perfect. It has never lived up to its potential. Often this has been due to the shenanigans of the powerful states, who persist in manipulating the institution for their own interests”.

The UN Security Council has long been the insecurity Council, given how the P5 are all implicated in one or other of the worst wars and genocides of the past 25 years, she said.

“But they are not solely to blame. Within the system too, we have seen both leadership and staff with vested interests, benefitting from the inertia, and unwilling to uphold new practices and priorities that would have brought transformative impact”.

“But dysfunction should not lead to abandonment and the dismantling of the system. The UN cannot be stripped and have its key assets and functions sold to the lowest bidder”.

Already, she said, the dystopian (US-created) Board of Peace is akin to the corporate raiders and vulture funds of the finance world – trying to strip the UN of its key functions but with no accountability or guard rails pertaining to its actions.

As it stands, the U.S. currently owes about $2.196 billion to the U.N.’s regular budget, including $767 million for this year and for prior years, according to U.N. sources.

The U.S. also owes $1.8 billion for the separate budget for the U.N.’s peacekeeping operations overseas, and that also will rise.

As of February 5, only 51 countries had paid their dues in full for 2026—that’s 51 out of 193. A breakdown of the last four payments follows: Australia, $65,309,876, Austria, $20,041,168, Croatia, $2,801,889, and Cyprus $1,120,513.

Dr. Stephen Zunes, Professor of Politics and International Studies at the University of San Francisco, told IPS on the one hand, the United States has been in arrears in its payments to the United Nations quite a bit in recent years, but the UN has managed to get by.

However, the extent of the Trump administration’s cutbacks and the ways they are being targeted at particularly vulnerable programs has resulted in this unprecedented fiscal crisis.

“The hostility of the Trump administration to the United Nations is extreme. Trump has made clear he believes there should be no legal restraints on the conduct of U.S. foreign policy, so it is not surprising he would seek to undermine the world’s primary institution mandated with supporting international law and world order,” declared Dr Zunes.

Addressing the UN’s Administrative and Budgetary Committee last week Chandramouli Ramanathan, Assistant Secretary-General, Controller, Management Strategy, Policy said: “The UN staff is progressively losing confidence in the entire budget process,” referring to cash shortages that have led to severe spending and hiring restrictions. The United Nations needs to find a compromise that allows the Organization to function effectively, he added.

Anderlini, elaborating further, told IPS “now more than ever, the institution must be sustained and enabled to thrive and deliver on the promise of the Charter, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the body of conventions and policies that have been developed through painstaking work to meet the challenges of today’s world.”

When global military spending is topping $2.6 trillion, she said, the UN’s approved annual budget of $3.45 billion seems like pocket change.

“It is absurd for our governments to be borrowing billions to fund weapons, but nickel and diming the UN, governmental agencies and civil society organizations that work to prevent conflict, build peace and ensure human and environmental security.”

“We live in an era where one man’s assets may soon be valued at over one trillion dollars and the world’s billionaire class wealth increased by $2.5 trillion in just one year 2025. They are lauded and applauded even though their wealth is made on the backs, bodies and lands of “We the people of the United Nations” – whether through tax avoidance or investment in high climate impact sectors such as fossil fuels and mining.”

Perhaps they should be taxed and forced to foot the bill for their complicity in the disasters that the UN is forced to clean up.

Peace and development are good for business, she argued. “They are essential for any society to survive and thrive. The UN and the global ecosystem of institutions and people dedicated to caring for the world give us our humanity – far beyond anything that can be limited to monetary value. But in dollar terms they are a great investment with returns that benefit billions of people worldwide, not just a stockpile of deadly weapons or a handful of billionaires”.

Thanks to member states’ abrogation of responsibility to uphold human rights and prevent the scourge of war, violence cost the world $19.97 trillion in 2024, or 11.6% of global GDP. According the Institute of Economics and peace this represents $2,455 per person, includes military spending, internal security, and lost economic activity, declared Anderlini.

IPS UN Bureau Report

 

Follow @IPSNewsUNBureau
!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],p=/^http:/.test(d.location)?'http':'https';if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src=p+'://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js';fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document, 'script', 'twitter-wjs');  

It comes after the US president suggested last month he could withdraw his support for the deal.

At least 78 bodies have been buried, while it's feared that more than 170 people were killed altogether.

At least 78 bodies have been buried, while it's feared that more than 170 people were killed altogether.

Am 11. Februar öffnet die Zurich Fashion Week. Doch hinter den Kulissen brodelt es: Gründer Remo Schmid verlässt den Verein. Von Tamy Glausers Statement dazu will er nichts gewusst haben.

Die Morettis brechen ihr Schweigen. In einem Brief an ihre Mitarbeitenden schreiben sie von Mitgefühl und Verleumdnung durch die Medien. Blick liegt das gesamte Schreiben vor.

MSF says a government air strike hit its hospital after another of its health facilities was looted.

Südwesteuropa kämpft aktuell mit Überflutungen und starken Sturmböen. Auch das Wetter in der Schweiz wird vom Wetterphänomen beeinflusst.

Grosse Gefühle und prominente Gäste: Im Zürcher blue Cinema Abaton feiert die Kinoadaption des Kultmusicals «Ewigi Liebi» Weltpremiere – mit Popstar Luca Hänni in seinem Schauspieldebüt und Liebesbekenntnissen von Sängerin Paola Felix.

Ein 19-jähriger Somalier verursachte am Mittwoch in Oensingen einen Unfall mit einem gestohlenen Auto. Der Mann war ohne Führerschein unterwegs und wurde mittelschwer verletzt sowie vorläufig festgenommen.

Les accidents miniers ont suscité l'émotion parmi les analystes, qui soulignent que le développement de l'Afrique s'est construit sur le dos de mineurs sans voix et à l'aide d'outils rudimentaires.

Graffiti in Kochi, Kerala, shows the whale shark (Rhincodon typus), the world’s largest fish, found along India’s coastline but remains poorly studied. In Kerala, fisher-reported sightings and landings led to the Save the Whale Shark Campaign (2022) with fishers and fisheries departments. Globally, the IUCN lists the whale shark as Endangered, with populations declining worldwide. Credit: Ashwarya Bajpai/IPS

By Aishwarya Bajpai
DELHI, Feb 5 2026 (IPS)

Melanie Brown has been fishing salmon in Bristol Bay, Alaska, for more than 30 years. An Indigenous fisherwoman and a coordinating committee member of the World Forum of Fisher Peoples, she speaks about the sea with deep care and lived knowledge.

When interviewed for IPS on Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), a global conservation policy introduced by the IUCN in 1999, Brown sounded both hopeful and cautious.

“It’s interesting,” she said. “Where I fish in Bristol Bay, if you follow the river upstream, it eventually reaches a lake system. Right at the point where the lake meets the river, there is a national park.”

Brown fishes the Naknek River, which has had a steady salmon run for years.

Melanie Brown, an Indigenous fisherwoman and a Coordinating Committee member of the World Forum of Fisher Peoples.

“I really believe it’s because of that park,” she said. The park, Katmai National Park, was created long before the UN’s 30×30 target — the global goal to protect 30 per cent of land and sea by 2030 — was signed in December 2022. It was first protected after a historic volcanic eruption in 1922 and later became a tourist attraction. Inside the park is Brooks Falls, where bears are often seen catching salmon.

Indigenous people are still allowed to fish in parts of the park, but only with special permission. Brown explained how salmon change when they enter freshwater.

“In the ocean, they’re shiny and silver. In freshwater, they turn red. They look different. They taste different.” Brown continues, “They stop feeding once they hit freshwater. All they care about is spawning. Dried salmon is important for us. It’s how we preserve food.”

She said this kind of protection has worked because it didn’t erase Indigenous fishing. But when it comes to Marine Protected Areas, she has mixed feelings.

“If an MPA stops people from doing their traditional fishing in places they’ve always fished, that’s wrong,” she said. “That shouldn’t happen unless there’s a real overfishing problem.”

Brown believes decisions should be made with the fishing communities.

“You can’t just draw a fenced area on a map and tell people they can’t go there anymore,” she said. “You need to work it out with the regulatory bodies and the fishers.”

Still, Brown knows MPAs can work if they are written well. In southeast Alaska, she said, a marine protected area was created to stop factory trawlers. “Small boat fishing is still allowed. The big industrial boats are kept out, but local fishers can continue.”

For her, the lesson is simple: protection and fishing do not have to be in conflict when communities are involved.

Community Custodianship in Kerala

Kumar Sahayaraju, a marine researcher with Friends of Marine Life (FML).

That idea of community involvement also emerged in an interview with Kumar Sahayaraju, a marine researcher with Friends of Marine Life (FML), who is also from a traditional fishing community in Trivandrum, Kerala, and a scuba diver. He believes MPAs only make sense when they are shaped by the people who live with the sea.

“It would be good if marine protected areas were created with community involvement,” he told  IPS. “That’s why internationally there is a push for co-management — a bottom-up approach.”

Sahayaraj spoke about reefs off the coast of Trivandrum — underwater ecosystems that fishing communities have used for generations. “These reefs were part of our traditional fishing grounds,” he said. “They were like a commons.”

But large mechanised and trawler boats have now entered these reef areas. “They are damaging the reefs and catching all the fish,” he said. “These reef fish supported traditional fishers for generations.”

Like Brown, Sahayaraju sees MPAs as a possible tool.

“In a situation like this, an MPA could give custodianship back to traditional fishers and stop destructive fishing methods,” he said. But he stressed that protection alone is not enough. “Access, authority and custodianship must remain with the community. That’s the only way MPAs can work for people and for the ocean.”

This tension between protection and access is playing out across the world as governments push new conservation solutions to deal with climate change and biodiversity loss. One of the biggest is the UN Convention on Biological Diversity’s 30×30 target. MPAs are now central to this goal.

Global Targets, Local Realities

Nayana Udayashankar, Senior Programme Officer at Dakshin Foundation.

Nayana Udayashankar, Senior Programme Officer at Dakshin Foundation, who works at the intersection of law, policy and marine conservation, explained that in India, Marine Protected Areas are legally set up under the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, and future MPAs will follow the amended Act of 2022.

“This law allows two kinds of conservation measures,” she said. “One is area-based protection, and the other is species-based protection.” MPAs, she added, fall under different categories of protected areas within this law. The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) has notified several MPAs across the country, including the Gulf of Mannar National Park off the coast of Tamil Nadu.

But Udayashankar questioned the core logic behind how many MPAs are designed.

“The fundamental idea of MPAs is often ‘no-take’ and the exclusion of humans from certain spaces,” she said. “That approach doesn’t always work for marine conservation.”

According to her, area-based protection in the sea is especially difficult.

“Marine life doesn’t stay in fixed ranges,” she explained. “Fish move constantly. You can’t just draw a boundary or fence off a part of the ocean and expect everything to stay inside it.”

She also pointed to wider contradictions in how conservation is practised.

“Several studies by agencies like CMFRI and the Gulf of Mannar Marine Biosphere Reserve Trust have clearly shown the ecological importance of both the Gulf of Mannar and the adjacent Palk Bay,” she said. “But at the same time, ecologically damaging activities just outside these MPAs continue.”

Unsustainable fishing practices and other coastal activities, she warned, threaten this rich marine ecosystem and undermine both conservation goals and sustainable development efforts.

Udayashankar stressed that she is not against conservation.

“A large number of people depend on marine resources for their livelihoods and income,” she said. “Sustainable fishing and other nature-based activities should be at the heart of any serious marine conservation approach.”

She argued that conservation strategies must be site-specific and shaped by local ecology.

“Most importantly, fishers need to be at the forefront of fisheries and coastal management, because they are directly dependent on healthy ecosystems.”

This may require changes in existing laws and policies. She pointed to alternatives such as Locally Managed Marine Areas, which Dakshin Foundation supports.

“These allow more flexibility and can meet multiple conservation objectives,” she said.

Udayashankar also highlighted Kerala’s fishing councils under the Kerala Marine Fisheries Regulation Act, where fishers participate in managing local fisheries.

“These initiatives are not perfect,” Udayashankar said, “but they are a step in the right direction.”

IPS UN Bureau Report

 

Follow @IPSNewsUNBureau
!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],p=/^http:/.test(d.location)?'http':'https';if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src=p+'://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js';fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document, 'script', 'twitter-wjs');  

UN Secretary-General António Guterres (left), is participating in a meeting with the Heads of State and Government of the European Union in Brussels, Belgium. Credit: UNRIC/Miranda Alexander-Webber Source: UN News

By Simone Galimberti
KATHMANDU, Nepal, Feb 5 2026 (IPS)

Will trade be enough to navigate the current waves of chaos and disorder that are underpinning the ongoing rifts among competing powerful and hegemon nations and the rest?

Amid tectonic shifts in the realm of geopolitics and international relations, amid what the Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney recently defined as a “rupture” in the rules-based multilateral order, trading is seen almost as a panacea.

Yet are we really sure that new and alternative trading partnerships like the ones the European Union has signed with the Mercosur and India are the only ways to cope with an increasingly unpredictable American administration and an over confident and more ambitious China?

Mark Carney in his speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos a few weeks ago offered a blueprint for middle powers like Canada on how they can become less dependent on big hegemon powers.

While he was tacitly describing a tactic to tackle a bossy, unpredictable and more and more authoritarian president south to the border, Mr. Carney provided a foundational framework on how countries like Canada can leverage its natural resources and bet big on the power of trade with alternative markets.

No one doubts that trade can open valuable new options for established economies as well for new emerging ones like India.

The EU has also pivoted to this realm, using new commercial deals as a way to strengthen its own resilience and boost its economy while having no other options than maintaining a good relationship with the USA. But a playbook entirely focused on trade will also hit the wall.

While useful in the short term to escape from or at least try dodging expansionist maneuverings from Washington or Beijing, trade has limitations as well. A comprehensive and long-term response to these new difficult emerging circumstances cannot but be political.

Trade should be seen as a part of a broader toolkit of policies centered on nations committing themselves to invest more on regional projects of cooperation with other nations.

Strengthening political ties among neighboring nations through enhanced economic partnerships could offer the initial impetus to a new form of international regionalism.

Yet nations, while capitalizing on the economic dimensions of their bilateral relationships, should also be powered by a bolder, wider and importantly, more inspiring design.

The need for initiatives that, by intent, go beyond economics while dealing with other nations, would provide the space to imagine new political entities that could get respected and even compete with the existing hegemonic powers.

Imagine how trade and economics was underpinning and turbocharging the project of regional cooperation in post second world war Europe.

With the time, what was a mere economic association, a successful story of cooperation among equals , the European Economic Community turned into something more visionary and braver, a project of regional integration.

As we know from the recent episodes of confrontations generated across the Atlantic that humiliated and defamed Europe, this project is far from being accomplished.

Capitals from around the world, in the Global South and Global North alike, need to understand one thing: only the pursuit of a wider vision with multiple and complementary elements of integration that transcend economy, can offer them the safest route to be able to remain independent.

The building of regional cooperation frameworks, think of Association of South East Asian Nations or the Southern Africa Development Community, can offer a pathway to uphold their members’ internal legitimacy among the citizens while at the same time, cementing their power in the realm of international relations.

Yet the lesson from Europe is clear: economic cooperation and even economic based integration can only go so far.

Only an unequivocal support for more audacious projects can provide states with the leverage needed to deal with few but unrestrained hegemonic powers like China and Russia but also the USA with the second Trump administration.

As difficult and daunting as it is, only regional integration can offer nations a degree of collective power that will earn them some decent amounts of respect. Unfortunately, even regional cooperation is in shambles.

The Southern Common Market or Mercosur despite hitting the headlines with the recent signing of a trade agreement with the EU, (an agreement that the European Parliament, the semi-legislative chamber of the EU, “paralyzed” it with a vote to deferring its legality to the European Court of Justice) is nowhere resembling a politically integrated body of nations.

Who remembers the existence of the Union of South American Nations or UNASUR? Even ASEAN, seen as a model of regional cooperation, is at risk of losing its credibility with its famed “centrality” being put in question.

In Africa, the potential of SADC has evaporated while the most promising and bold attempt of building a political union, the East African Community (EAC) that was supposed to transform itself into a real federation, the East African Federation, also lost considerable steam.

Thanks to Mr. Trump’s ego and dramas stemming from it, the EU is now forced to reconsider its current trajectory of regional integration.

At this current pace and course, the EU will never be able to stand its ground and remain united and cohesive in tackling both overt and veiled threats and blackmails from the hegemonic powers vying to dominate the world.

The EU must be able to project power beyond its economic realm as Mario Draghi, the former Italian Prime Minister and President of the European Central Bank recently shared at the KU Leuven University in Belgium.

“Power requires Europe to move from confederation to federation” because as things stand now, Europe cannot even imagine to be able to survive as it is now.

“ “This is a future in which Europe risks becoming subordinated, divided and de-industrialized at once, and a Europe that cannot defend its interests will not preserve its values for longer.”

Mr Carney, the Canadian Prime Minister, should be praised for mincing no words in Davos. But rupture in the current multilateral order cannot be fixed with band aid solutions.

As much as important trade remains, it is going to be delusional to believe that, alone, it can do the job, in sewing and patching up the rupture that has been created and offer a very potent but still incomplete solution for nations.

We need initiatives that, by design, are fit to build political projects that, while start with nation states at the center, are able to envision, in a not too far horizon, a much more daring political project.

Brussels, as the de facto capital of the EU, could again provide a blueprint for this quantum jump towards a new phase of the European political project that can finally pursue deeper forms of union that, inescapably, would embrace federalism.

After all, the best way to preserve a nation’s standing is to invest in new forms of shared sovereignty.

This should not be a priority only for middle powers like Canada or the members of the EU. Even developing nations must come to terms with this new order and understand that their survival will be only guaranteed through ambitious initiatives of regional cooperation that have only the sky as the limit.

Unfortunately for Mr Carney and Canada, geography is unforgiving.

Who knows, perhaps we could imagine what are now unimaginable ties that would perpetually bind Ottawa with Europe or Mexico and the Caribbean.

Simone Galimberti writes about the SDGs, youth-centered policy-making and a stronger and better United Nations.

IPS UN Bureau

 

Follow @IPSNewsUNBureau
!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],p=/^http:/.test(d.location)?'http':'https';if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src=p+'://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js';fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document, 'script', 'twitter-wjs');  

Au Kosovo, les politiques sociales consistent essentiellement à distribuer des aides d'urgence, sans véritable stratégie de réduction de la pauvreté. Une politique qui peut même avoir des effets pervers, notamment en maintenant les femmes à l'écart du marché du travail.

- Articles / Radio Evropa e Lirë, Kosovo, Une - Diaporama, Société, Politique, Economie, Une - Diaporama - En premier

Algerian boxer Imane Khelif says she would take a sex test if it allowed her to compete at the 2028 Olympic Games.

Nach tödlichen Protesten in Minneapolis zieht Donald Trump 700 Bundesbeamte ab. Der US-Präsident spricht von einem nötigen Kurswechsel, bekräftigt aber, dass man weiterhin entschlossen gegen Kriminelle vorgehen werde.

La visite médicale d'aptitude des candidats admissibles au concours de recrutement de 715 élèves agents de police est programmée du lundi 9 au vendredi 13 février 2026.

Les candidats admissibles au concours de recrutement de 715 élèves agents de police sont convoqués au Centre de santé de la Police républicaine de Cotonou, situé au quartier Vèdoko, pour la visite médicale d'aptitude.

Ils devront s'y présenter le lundi 9 février à 7 heures précises, « en tenue de sport et munis de leurs pièces d'identité en cours de validité », selon un communiqué de la Direction générale de la Police républicaine.

Cette étape médicale intervient après la publication des résultats de la phase écrite du concours. « La liste des candidats déclarés admissibles » est disponible en ligne sur https://concours.dgpr.easyiteam.bj et affichée au siège des douze Directions départementales de la Police républicaine.

Un visuel marque la Une de la presse depuis quelques jours. Il s'agit d'un emblème aux traits évocateurs : Soleil levant, à moitié caché par un paysage scintillant sous sa lumière et des silhouettes en admiration devant un horizon de rêve, le tout incrusté dans un environnement de verdure qu'entrelacent des lianes. Le logo suscite des interrogations, alimente les conversations et fait l'objet de spéculations.

Fin de suspense pour le logo du Groupe de réflexion « Nouveaux Horizons ». Les initiateurs, concepteurs et auteurs des messages véhiculés par ce logo ont décidé maintenant de sortir de l'anonymat.

Leur vision est en parfaite harmonie avec le message délivré, le 03 février 2026, au Dôme du Sofitel Cotonou, par le président de la République. Son Excellence Monsieur Patrice TALON a prononcé l'un des discours les plus prophétiques de l'histoire du Bénin, projetant aux horizons 2060, les images d'un Bénin devenu un « Monde de Splendeurs ».

Ce grand événement s'est déroulé sous le regard prometteur et rassurant de WADAGNI-TALATA, duo candidat de la mouvance à l'élection présentielle d'avril 2026.
Selon l'explication des initiateurs du GRA, pour un Bénin des splendeurs, il faut des actes, mais surtout des acteurs de premier plan. GRA « Nouveaux Horizons » est ainsi en parfaite harmonie avec la vision futuriste d'un Bénin meilleur, devenu le gouvernail de la gouvernance du Bénin. Ce Groupe de réflexion est en avant-garde de la construction de ces nouveaux horizons.

GRA « Nouveaux Horizons » n'est pas un « nouveau venu » parmi tant d'autres. A vrai dire, il incarne la naissance d'un ESPOIR qui ne s'éteindra plus.

GRA « Nouveaux Horizons » est avant tout une organisation atypique dont la vision est celle d'un futur radieux pour la République du Bénin, et qui se construit avec le présent et les personnes de bonne volonté.

Avec GRA « Nouveaux Horizons », une nouvelle aventure commence pour le Bénin d'Aujourd'hui et de Demain.
Le Groupe a pris la mesure de ce que l'espoir de demain se construit aujourd'hui et a donc décidé de se positionner comme l'un des artisans les plus engagés, aux côtés des acteurs politiques et des partenaires au développement, pour que véritablement, le Bénin affiche sur tous les plans la splendeur qu'il mérite.

GRA « Nouveaux Horizons » est dans le fond une organisation d'analyse citoyenne et du peuple, regroupant des jeunes de tous horizons, des femmes et des hommes de nationalité béninoise, vivant ou non sur le territoire national. Il est ouvert aux sympathisants non nationaux unis à la République du Bénin par des liens particuliers.
Ses membres sont des personnes résolument engagées au service du développement, de la défense de bonnes valeurs éthiques et morales, à travers des actions simples, citoyennes et patriotiques.
Par ailleurs, les citoyens issus de différentes couches ou catégories socioprofessionnelles du pays, ayant le sens de l'Etat, de la République, de la Nation et l'amour de la patrie sont les bienvenus dans ce creuset d'échanges et de formation à la citoyenneté et au patriotisme avéré.

Une organisation pour accompagner le développement du Bénin

GRA « Nouveaux Horizons », loin de se prévaloir d'un quelconque statut de parti politique, est une organisation qui accompagne toute action publique ou privée visant à assurer le bien-être des populations, la paix sociale et le progrès collectif.
Paix sociale et progrès collectif qui mettent davantage en valeur le développement socio-économique du Bénin.

Soutien au duo candidat de la mouvance

L'un des principaux objectifs immédiats du Groupe de réflexion, c'est d'œuvrer à soutenir et à faire porter davantage le duo de candidatures WADAGNI-TALATA en menant des actions concrètes et efficaces sur le terrain, et dans toutes les localités du pays, pour une victoire éclatante à la présidentielle d'avril prochain.

Aussi, les membres du GRA « Nouveaux Horizons » sont-ils déterminés à œuvrer pour convaincre les électeurs à se déplacer massivement pour accomplir leur devoir civique, et marquer leur adhésion par un fort taux de participation à la poursuite de la marche du Bénin vers des horizons meilleurs.

Aussi convient-il de préciser que les idéaux du GRA « Nouveaux Horizons » se perpétueront au-delà de 2026. En ce sens qu'il ne saurait s'assimiler ou se confondre à des mouvements, regroupements ou associations de fortune qui, après avoir poussé comme des champignons, disparaissent, sans s'assurer d'avoir atteint les objectifs assignés.

REJOIGNEZ-NOUS DÈS MAINTENANT POUR UNE EXPERIENCE DE RÊVE.
GRA « NOUVEAUX HORIZONS », POUR UN FUTUR RADIEUX POUR TOUS.

Le président de la Commission de l'Union économique et monétaire ouest-africaine (UEMOA), Abdoulaye Diop, a reçu mardi 3 février 2026 au siège de l'institution à Ouagadougou une délégation de l'Organisation internationale du travail (OIT), dans le cadre des échanges autour du programme conjoint OIT-UEMOA d'appui à la création d'emplois pour les jeunes sur la période 2026-2030.

La Commission de l'Union économique et monétaire ouest-africaine (UEMOA) et l'Organisation internationale du travail (OIT) ont exploré, mardi 3 février 2026, des opportunités de partenariat pour renforcer l'accès des jeunes de l'espace communautaire à des emplois décents et productifs. La rencontre tenue au siège de l'UEMOA à Ouagadougou s'est déroulée en présence de plusieurs commissaires de l'UEMOA, dont Mamadú Serifo Jaquite, Paul Koffi Koffi et Filiga Michel Sawadogo.

Conduite par le directeur régional adjoint du Bureau régional de l'OIT pour l'Afrique, Coffi Dominique Agossou, la délégation comprenait notamment la directrice du Bureau pays à Abidjan, Couba Diop, ainsi que des spécialistes de l'employabilité et de l'emploi des jeunes.

Selon l'OIT, le programme vise à améliorer durablement l'insertion professionnelle des jeunes femmes et hommes âgés de 15 à 35 ans dans les États membres de l'UEMOA, à travers la stimulation de la demande d'emplois, le renforcement de la productivité des petites et moyennes entreprises, l'amélioration de l'employabilité, de la qualité de l'emploi et de la gouvernance du marché du travail.

Présentant les grandes lignes de l'initiative, Coffi Dominique Agossou a détaillé le contexte, les objectifs et la valeur ajoutée du programme, soulignant son alignement avec les priorités nationales et régionales, notamment la Vision 2040 de l'Union, le plan stratégique IMPACT 2030 de la Commission et la Stratégie Genre de l'UEMOA. Il a également sollicité les orientations du président Diop sur la formulation et la mise en œuvre du projet, proposant la mise en place d'un comité technique conjoint et l'instauration d'un cadre formel de collaboration entre les deux institutions à travers un protocole d'accord.

Le président de la Commission a, pour sa part, salué « l'excellente collaboration entre l'OIT et la Commission de l'UEMOA dans plusieurs domaines, au service du bien-être des populations de l'Union ». Insistant sur la centralité de l'emploi dans l'agenda communautaire, Abdoulaye Diop a rappelé les travaux engagés par la Commission dans le cadre de la Vision 2040 et du plan IMPACT 2030. Il a toutefois souligné la complexité de la problématique, estimant qu'elle ne saurait être abordée de manière uniforme.
Le président Diop a enfin rassuré la délégation de l'OIT de l'engagement de la Commission en faveur du programme régional, précisant que les équipes techniques des deux institutions poursuivront les échanges pour finaliser le document du projet.