Credit: UN Photo/Loey Felipe September 2025
By Annalena Baerbock
UNITED NATIONS, Dec 4 2025 (IPS)
For seventy-eight years, the question of Palestine has been on the agenda of this General Assembly, almost as long as the institution itself.
Resolution 181 (II) was adopted by the General Assembly on November 29 1947 – laying the foundation for the Two State Solution and calling for the establishment of both an Arab State and a Jewish State in Palestine.
But while the Jewish State, the State of Israel, is a recognized Member State of the United Nations, the Arab State, the State of Palestine, is not.
Seventy-eight years later, Palestine has still not been admitted to the UN as a full Member.
For 78 years the Palestinian people have been denied their inalienable rights – in particular, their right to self-determination. Now, it is high time that we take decisive action to end this decades-long stalemate.
The atrocities committed by Hamas on October 7th set off one of the darkest chapters in this conflict. Two years of war in Gaza have left tens of thousands of civilians killed, including many women and children. Countless more have been injured, maimed, and traumatized for life.
Communities are starving; civilian infrastructure is in ruins; almost the entire population is displaced. Children, mothers, fathers, families like us.
The hostages who have been finally released and reunited with their loved ones are slowly recovering from captivity under extremely dire conditions, while other families are mourning over the returned bodies. Again, children, fathers, mothers, families like us.
And while the horrors of Gaza have dominated the news for two years, settlement expansion, demolitions and increased settler violence in the occupied West Bank, including East Jerusalem continue to undermine the prospects for a sovereign, independent, contiguous and viable Palestinian state.
Palestinian communities are bifurcated by the rapid expansion of settlements. Movement, communication and access to essential services and livelihoods are severely restricted for Palestinians by checkpoints, confiscations and demolitions.
While in my previous capacity, I visited a small village in the West Bank to actually meet with Palestinian farmers and teachers who wanted to show me what settlement expansion and settler violence meant for their daily lives.
As we stood on a hillside overlooking their farmland, a drone from an Israeli settlement began hovering above us, circling in the air, monitoring what we were doing and probably saying.
We know what happens when foreign people and cameras are no longer there. It’s not just a drone watching; it’s outright violence, including farmers being attacked as they try to go to work, as they try to harvest.
Beyond the violence itself are the daily indignities confronting the residents of the West Bank, including children getting to school or thousands of pregnant women rushing to hospital to receive care or give birth, only to be stopped at checkpoints or by road closures.
All that has happened in the last two years has all underlined what we have known since decades. The Israeli–Palestinian conflict cannot be resolved through illegal occupation, de jure or de facto annexation, forced displacement, recurrent terror or permanent war.
This only adds to grievances and fuels the flames of conflict.
Israelis and Palestinians will only live in lasting peace, security, and dignity when they live side by side in two sovereign and independent states, with mutually recognized borders and full regional integration –
As outlined in the New York Declaration, which is indeed a ray of hope, and the adoption of Resolution 2803 in which the Security Council endorsed the “Comprehensive Plan to End the Conflict in Gaza”.
We see unfortunately again on a daily basis that these are only words on paper if we do not deliver. We need to ensure that the ceasefire is consolidated and becomes a permanent end to hostilities. Since this ceasefire at least 67 children have been killed; and again, we see children being left without parents, or left in the rubble.
This has to end.
And as we brace for the increasing cold in New York ourselves, imagine what winter means for the people of Gaza: tents collapsing under rain, families shivering without shelter, children facing the night with nothing but thin fabric between them and the wind, and countless people still going to sleep hungry.
If we want to live up to our commitments, we need humanitarian agencies, on the ground without hindrance and without excuse.
And we need to ensure that humanitarian aid is delivered throughout all Gaza in a full, safe, unconditional and unhindered manner, in full accordance with international humanitarian law and humanitarian principles. And this includes delivery through UNRWA.
And as outlined in the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the obligations of Israel in relation to the presence and activities of the United Nations in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, allowing UNRWA to fulfil its mandate and continue operations there is not merely a gesture of goodwill, it is a legal obligation.
Both the General Assembly and the Security Council have been consistent on the parameters that must guide any peaceful resolution of the conflict. So, we know what we have to do.
These parameters are again reiterated in the draft resolution before this Assembly today, relating to the New York Declaration, which was endorsed by a vast majority of Member States, and identified a comprehensive and actionable framework including tangible, timebound and irreversible steps for the implementation of the Two-State-Solution, in particular that resolution underlined that Gaza must be unified with the West Bank. There must be no occupation, siege, territorial reduction, or forced displacement.
It underlines that Hamas must end its rule in Gaza and hand over its weapons to the Palestinian Authority.
It makes clear that the Palestinian Authority must continue implementing its credible reform agenda focusing on good governance, transparency, fiscal sustainability, fight against incitement and hate speeches, service provision, business climate and development.
And it calls on the Israeli leadership to immediately end violence and incitement against Palestinians, and immediately halt all settlement, land grabs and annexation activities in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem. It makes clear that it has to end the violence of the settlers.
As diplomats we all know this is hard diplomatic work. And therefore , I want to be frank and clear.
The quest for peace, stability and justice in the Middle East needs our United Nations. It needs this Assembly to play a meaningful role.
It requires every Member State to walk the talk: to engage in this process, to uphold the United Nations Charter, to adhere to international law, and the promise this institution made to all the people of the world eighty years ago.
Let us recall once more: self-determination, and the right to live in one’s own state in peace, security, and dignity, free from war, occupation and violence, is not a privilege to be earned, but a right to be upheld.
IPS UN Bureau
Follow @IPSNewsUNBureau
Excerpt:
Annalena Baerbock In her address as President of the UN General AssemblyDrone view from Combu Island, with the city of Belém, where COP30 took place, in the background. Credit: Alex Ferro/COP30
By Umar Manzoor Shah
SRINAGAR, Dec 4 2025 (IPS)
“I see more philanthropic support aligning with systems thinking, linking climate stability, biodiversity protection, Indigenous leadership, and community resilience,” says Michael Northrop, Program Director at the Rockefeller Brothers Fund.
In an interview with Inter Press Service (IPS), he says funding is increasingly moving beyond isolated interventions and siloed approaches. The intersection between climate, nature, and Indigenous rights can be considered together. He sees philanthropy moving in that direction, and the momentum is growing.
Northrop is particularly excited about the recent COP30 Tropical Forest Forever Facility (TFFF) announcement. Over the past two years, the Fund has backed the facility while in its development stages. TFFF targets the protection of 1.2 billion hectares of tropical rainforests across more than 70 low- and middle-income countries.
The TFFF was launched during COP 30 with USD 5.5 billion in commitments from sponsor countries, strong endorsements from 53 countries, and plans for delivery. It has a long-term goal of raising about USD 125 billion.
All-in-one Solution
He calls it a nature solution, a climate solution, an Indigenous peoples and local communities solution, and an economic development solution, all in one.
“The Brazilian government raised almost USD 7 billion in early contributions. They aim to secure another USD 15 billion from governments over the next 12 to 18 months, then attract USD 100 billion in private investment. This structure focuses on investment instead of grants or loans. Countries will get paid per hectare of standing forest they conserve,” Northrop told IPS.
Northrop sees this initiative as a major departure from traditional models. It rewards protection instead of exploitation and avoids burdening countries with increased debt.
He appreciates Brazil’s leadership in promoting this initiative, stating that the RBF has been working with Brazilians and other nations for nearly two years. “The current challenge is moving from concept to a mature investment mechanism that can finance forest protection at scale.”
Indigenous peoples and local communities already protect nature more effectively than any other model, he says.
“Half of the world’s remaining intact forests are within Indigenous territories. Almost 45 percent of global biodiversity exists within those lands, although formal recognition of land rights often lags. In regions such as the Amazon, the Congo Basin, and Southeast Asia, granting tenure to indigenous communities has helped protect forests, marine resources, and ways of life.”
Michael Northrop, Program Director at the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, in a remote Ecuadorian Amazon rainforest. Photo: Supplied
He emphasizes that when giving sovereignty and governance responsibilities to Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLCs), they do not require extensive external resources.
“They need safety, legal recognition, and the freedom to live on and defend their lands. This is a powerful message that is now understood more widely.”
Single Lens Needed to Tackle Multiple Issues
One of the greatest obstacles, according to Northrop, lies in the way global systems compartmentalize climate, nature, and indigenous issues. Climate change, he says, is treated through one lens, biodiversity through another, and Indigenous rights through yet another.
These areas are interdependent but managed separately. Negotiators at UN climate summits differ from those at biodiversity forums. They often belong to different ministries, speak different scientific languages, and focus on different priorities. As a result, policy responses malfunction.”
Northrop believes the disconnect reflects human cognitive limits.
“Most people cannot think deeply about these big systems all at once. Yet he notes progress in recognizing connections, supported through the powerful visual mapping of these connections that Earth Insight did before COP30. He believes accessible visuals help experts see the interdependencies more effectively.
The fund uses field visits to identify partners. Northrop says the institution does not have a big staff, so it relies on travel and direct engagement. The Fund looks for people who think on a large scale and design strategies to solve complex problems. Reviewing paper proposals alone is insufficient. He says real understanding comes from meeting people, seeing their environments, and learning what drives them.
There are enormous numbers of positive examples of effective philanthropy, but even with these, the overall volume of the work is insufficient. He notes a generational shift in the sector that contributes to current impact.
“Earlier, philanthropic institutions often hired academics without social change and policy change experience. Today, staff are increasingly drawn from social movements, campaign organizations, and policy implementation roles.”
He finds this shift encouraging.
Michael Northrop, Program Director at the Rockefeller Brothers Fund (RBF), inspects oil pipelines in the Ecuadorian Amazon. RBF stresses that Indigenous peoples and local communities already protect nature more effectively than any other model. Photo: Supplied
Still, philanthropy cannot substitute for strong governance and policy. He points to worrying trends in the United States, where decisions that protected social and environmental systems are being reversed. He insists progress depends on government action alongside philanthropic support. Both are needed.
At COP30, Northrop notes a split in approaches among countries. “A large number wanted to phase out fossil fuels and halt deforestation. Others, including major oil-producing nations, continue to push for extraction. The world has already crossed the threshold for burning new fossil fuel reserves if it hopes to protect the planet.”
Unfortunately there is also continued pressure to industrialize forest landscapes through oil, mining, logging, and agriculture.
Fossil Fuel Phase-Out Efforts
Northrop expects philanthropy will support the 80 countries that have committed to a fossil fuel phase-out. This approach may need adoption outside the formal COP mechanisms, given the split in Belém. He also expects strong philanthropic engagement to support efforts to end deforestation.
He would like to see immediate action on phasing out fossil fuels and ending deforestation. He says the world cannot wait.
The link between forest protection and fossil fuel restraint is direct. Extraction becomes more difficult if forest areas are left intact. Keeping reserves in the ground helps safeguard forests. Northrop believes strategies must be aligned.
He sees growing collaboration among philanthropic groups focused on nature and climate—a new and expanding trend—which must continue because neither philanthropy nor policy can solve these issues alone. Both must work together with civil society and indigenous communities.
Northrop is clear about the biggest challenge for climate philanthropy—achieving scale. Philanthropy alone cannot deliver transformation at the necessary magnitude. Only policy can. Philanthropy must help develop and support strong policy and governance to scale systemic change.
His personal motivation, which developed early in life, continues to drive him. He says he’s fortunate to have met so many mission-driven people throughout his four decades of work on nature, climate, and development. He has deep respect for how social change agents’ minds work. What keeps him going, he says, is listening. He tries to understand what people are doing and what inspires them. He credits individuals who have driven major changes in the environmental, health, and education systems for inspiring his work.
Northrop believes there is more philanthropy today and that more players think globally. He welcomes new actors with practical experience in change-making. He warns that philanthropic support must be backed by stable national and international policy.
“The coming months will test whether the Tropical Forest Forever Facility advances beyond the pilot stage. If it succeeds, it could become one of the most significant efforts yet devised to reward protection instead of destruction.”
IPS UN Bureau Report
Follow @IPSNewsUNBureau
Excerpt:
Le journaliste sportif français Christophe Gleizes, collaborateur des magazines So Foot et Society, a de nouveau comparu ce mercredi devant la Cour d’appel de Tizi-Ouzou. […]
L’article Christophe Gleizes : sa requête au juge dévoilée après près 10 ans de prison requis est apparu en premier sur .
Une famille de la commune de Milia, dans la wilaya de Jijel, était sur le point de tout perdre. Après le décès du père, une […]
L’article 1 milliard collecté en 48 h : la solidarité des Algériens sauve une veuve et ses orphelins de la rue est apparu en premier sur .
En Conseil des ministres ce mercredi 03 décembre 2025, le gouvernement a marqué son accord pour l'implémentation de la Plateforme de Recherche, d'Investigation et d'Analyse médico-légale (PRIAM).
Le Bénin sera bientôt doté d'un laboratoire national d'analyse ADN autonome, conforme aux standards internationaux. Ce laboratoire sera opérationnel à travers la Plateforme de Recherche, d'Investigation et d'Analyse médico-légale. La décision a été prise ce mercredi 03 décembre 2025 en Conseil des ministres.
Selon le communiqué du gouvernement, l'absence d'un dispositif d'analyse ADN constitue une faiblesse structurelle majeure dans le fonctionnement de la chaîne judiciaire des pays de la sous-région. Cette lacune impacte négativement la célérité des procédures, la résolution des affaires criminelles complexes et la souveraineté de l'État en matière de gestion des données sensibles.
La mise en place de la PRIAM, solution pertinente à cette insuffisance consistera à :
– la mise en place d'un laboratoire modulaire robotisé de 220 m², entièrement équipé, adapté aux conditions climatiques locales ;
– la formation certifiante de l'équipe technique dédiée ainsi qu'en des sessions spécifiques à l'attention de l'ensemble des acteurs de la chaîne judiciaire (Officiers de police judiciaire, magistrats, greffiers, experts techniques) ;
– un accompagnement opérationnel suivi par un laboratoire d'hématologie médico-légale européen pendant deux ans, avec assistance à l'exploitation, transfert de compétences et appui à l'obtention de l'accréditation ISO 17025.
Cet ensemble intégré selon le gouvernement, a l'avantage d'assurer la pleine opérationnalité du laboratoire au bout d'un an et l'accréditation internationale à l'issue de la deuxième année. En Afrique subsaharienne, détaille le Conseil des ministres, « un seul laboratoire de même type dispose actuellement de cette accréditation ».
La mise en œuvre de la PRIAM fera du Bénin le pôle régional de référence en analyse ADN, en raison des retombées évidentes telles que la maîtrise des données génétiques nationales ; l'accélération des procédures criminelles et l'amélioration du taux de résolution des enquêtes.
F. A. A.
Deux (02) sociétés ont été agréées au Code des Investissements, ce mercredi 3 décembre 2025, en Conseil des ministres.
Deux sociétés sont éligibles au régime des investissements spécifiques. Il s'agit de EKA WORLD SAS, pour son projet de construction et d'exploitation d'un éco-parc de loisirs dans la vallée du Sitatunga, arrondissement de Zinvié, commune d'Abomey- Calavi. La deuxième société BENIN GAS TRANSFORMATION AND SOLUTIONS SA, porte un projet d'installation d'une conduite de gazoduc reliant la centrale électrique de Maria-Gléta à la zone industrielle de Glo-Djigbé et la construction d'une station de décompression de gaz naturel comprimé, dans la zone industrielle de Glo-Djigbé.
« La réalisation de ces deux projets va impacter positivement les secteurs touristique et industriel autant qu'elle contribuera à la création d'emplois décents », informe le Conseil des ministres.
A.A.A
Autocratisation has become a defining global trend, replacing decades of democratisation and forcing democracy promoters to rethink their approaches. Democracy promoters must adapt to several challenges, including autocratisation in target countries, the rise of powerful autocratic competitors in the global arena, and challenges to democracy in some of the very countries promoting it. Moreover, the crisis in development aid fuelled by the withdrawal of funding by the United States (US) and other countries, and their prioritisation of security, pose further structural challenges. This Policy Brief examines the effects of the global trend of autocratisation on international democracy promotion, summarising findings from a collaborative research project (Grimm et al., 2025).
The findings show that democracy promoters respond to these shifts in four ways: 1) choosing to “carry on and observe” by continuing existing programmes and maintaining cooperation rather than risking confrontation; 2) reinforcing rhetorical and diplomatic efforts for democracy, to signal continued commitment; 3) selectively adapting policies and strategies, with renewed focus on civil society, education and targeted funding, yet rarely making substantive policy changes; 4) disengaging by shifting cooperation toward less politicised fields or withdrawing entirely. So far, however, we lack evidence on the effectiveness of these responses to counter autocratisation.
Given the new challenges to democracy promotion arising from the changed international context, democracy promoters should consider taking the following actions:
Ramping up efforts to counter the rise of autocratic powers: Democracy promoters should proactively deepen their pro-democracy cooperation, reaffirm democratic alliances and maintain a clear normative profile. They should invest in long-term partnerships with governments and civil societies committed to democratic reform.
Revitalising the norm of democracy: Democracy promoters must make a case for why democracy matters, highlighting that it delivers rights and freedoms, as well as stability, prosperity, and peace – at least as effectively as autocratic regimes. Emphasising its tangible benefits can help restore faith in its long-term value, and counter the appeal of autocratic alternatives.
Coordinating strategies and combining strengths: Joint frameworks for action among democracy promoters are needed that allow for the simultaneous use of different instruments, e.g. political dialogue, development cooperation, human rights advocacy and economic incentives. Combining direct and indirect democracy promotion increases adaptability.
Adapting democracy promotion to the context: In contexts where democracy is being eroded, prioritise the defence of current democratic institutions, actors and practices rather than pushing for rapid reforms. Strengthen local actors who uphold democratic values, protect them against repression and maintain spaces for civic participation.
Restoring credibility: Democracy-promoting states and organisations should openly discuss challenges to democracy at home in order to rebuild trust, strengthen legitimacy and facilitate collaboration in defence of democracy. Reinforcing own democratic institutions and upholding the rule of law contributes to restoring the credibility of democracy promoters.