Feed aggregator

© Marine nationale

Six marins reçoivent la Médaille de la Protection Militaire du Territoire

Le 22 juillet 2016, l’amiral Christophe Prazuck, a présidé sa première cérémonie à Balard en tant que Chef d’état-major de la Marine. Cette remise de décorations a été l’occasion pour le CEMM de remettre la Médaille de la Protection Militaire du Territoire à six marins : le Mjr S. et le QM1 G. (agrafe Egide), le MTE M. et la SM B. (agrafe Jupiter) ainsi que le SM F. et le QM1 M. [Portraits ci dessous]

Créé en juillet 2015, la médaille de la « protection militaire du territoire » récompense et valorise notamment la participation des marins à la sûreté de la dissuasion océanique, avec l’agrafe Jupiter, la  défense maritime du territoire avec l’agrafe Trident, et à la protection des emprises stratégiques de la Marine  avec l’agrafe Egide, notamment ses bases navales et aéronavales, les centres de  commandement et de transmissions.

Depuis de nombreuses années, la Marine participe en permanence à la défense maritime du territoire, la sûreté des approches maritimes et portuaires et à la protection de nos emprises nucléaires et de dissuasion, grâce à un dispositif mobilisant l’ensemble des unités de la Marine et de la gendarmerie maritime à terre ou en mer, agissant du littoral à la haute mer pour surveiller, renseigner et agir.

L’amiral Prazuck a rappelé lors de son discours le très haut niveau d’engagement opérationnel de la Marine pour la sécurité de nos compatriotes et la défense des intérêts de notre pays.  Ainsi, 3 700 marins (10% des effectifs) sont engagés quotidiennement dans les missions permanentes de protection du territoire national et de nos concitoyens. Le CEMM a rappelé que cet engagement n’était possible que grâce au soutien indéfectible des familles et a réaffirmé sa confiance envers les marins.

[PORTRAITS DES MARINS DECORES]

• Agrafe JUPITER

 

​MT Hansy M., affecté à la compagnie de fusiliers de Sainte-assise, 15 ans d’ancienneté au sein de la Marine.

Cols Bleus : Vous venez de recevoir la médaille de la protection militaire du territoire, agrafe Jupiter, qui n’existe que depuis début avril, que représente cette médaille ?

Maitre Hansy M. : c’est un honneur de se faire récompenser pour le travail accompli au quotidien pour notre spécialité et le service rendu pour la Marine.

Quelles missions vous ont valu de recevoir cette décoration ?

 Nous avons reçu cette récompense pour avoir effectué trente mois d’affectation dans la compagnie de protection de la force océanique stratégique (FOST), où nous avons réalisé plusieurs protections de sites de dissuasion.

Avez-vous d’autres médailles ? Laquelle vous rend le plus fier ?

 C’est une médaille de reconnaissance de la Nation qui est accordée à l’issu des missions en opérations extérieurs.

Je suis très fier d’avoir reçu cette récompense aujourd’hui, qui permet de reconnaitre notre engagement et notre action sur le territoire nationale. Cette distinction prend d’autant plus de sens dans le contexte actuel.   Elle nous permet aussi de nous rappeler que nous agissons avant tout pour protéger les citoyens.

Pourquoi les médailles sont-elles si importantes dans les armées ? Et pour vous en particulier ?

C’est toujours un honneur et une fierté d’en recevoir car elles récompensent le travail accompli !

• Agrafe TRIDENT ​

​

QM1 Camille M., affecté au sémaphore de Saint-Jean-Cap-Ferrat en tant que guetteur sémaphorique, 3 ans d’ancienneté au sein de la Marine.

Cols Bleus : Vous venez de recevoir la médaille de la protection militaire du territoire, agrafe Trident, qui n’existe que depuis début avril, que représente cette médaille?

QM1 Camille M. : C’est avant tout une réelle fierté et je suis très contente d’avoir pu participer à cette cérémonie pour représenter ma spécialité : guetteur sémaphorique.

Quelles missions vous ont valu de recevoir cette décoration ?

J’ai reçu cette décoration dans le cadre d’une mission permanente de surveillance et de protection maritime et aéromaritime. Ce n’est donc pas à l’occasion d’une mission particulière, mais bien pour la réalisation de notre mission   permanente au cours de notre affectation.

Avez-vous d’autres médailles ? Laquelle vous rend le plus fier ?

Je n’ai pas eu d’autre médaille dans ma carrière car je n’ai pas encore eu l’occasion d’embarquer à bord d’un bâtiment ; c’est donc la première fois que j’en reçois une. Recevoir cette première médaille me donne envie de continuer à m’investir pour la Marine et mon pays !

Pourquoi les médailles sont-elles si importantes dans les armées ? Et pour vous en particulier ?

Elles nous accordent la reconnaissance de l’institution, nous mettent en valeur et nous donnent l’impression d’appartenir encore d’avantage au corps militaire.

• Agrafe EGIDE

​

 QM1 Guillaume G., spécialité matelot « pont d’envol », 10 ans d’ancienneté dans la Marine.

Cols Bleus : Vous venez de recevoir une médaille de protection militaire du territoire, agrafe Egide, qui n’existe que depuis début avril, que représente cette médaille?

QM1 Guillaume G : C’est une grande fierté et un réel plaisir d’obtenir une reconnaissance par ce biais, d’autant plus que nous faisons partie des premiers décorés de cette distinction. C’est aussi une reconnaissance de notre travail car nous sommes souvent sollicités.

Quelles missions vous ont valu de recevoir cette décoration ?

J’ai effectué une mission de protection des emprises stratégiques de la Marine, pour moi sur le site de Balard pendant un mois en juillet 2015 et une autre mission sur le site de l’Ecole militaire.

Avez-vous d’autres médailles ? Laquelle vous rend le plus fier ?

Oui, j’ai déjà reçu la médaille de la Défense nationale, mais c’est celle-ci qui me rend le plus fier, car elle représente beaucoup de travail pour son obtention. C’est donc très gratifiant de pourvoir l’acquérir !

Pourquoi les médailles sont-elles si importantes dans les armées ? Et pour vous en particulier 

C’est une reconnaissance du travail effectué et des missions réalisées car on n’obtient jamais de médaille sans efforts.

Source: Marine nationale
Droits: Marine nationale

Vos réactions:  Select ratingGive it 1/5Give it 2/5Give it 3/5Give it 4/5Give it 5/5 Moyenne: 3 (2 votes)

Les élus de l’opposition contestent l’interdiction des pesticides néonicotinoïdes et le principe de « non-régression » de la protection de l’environnement.

INTERVIEW - Pour imposer aux réseaux sociaux, dont Facebook, Google et Twitter, de ne pas diffuser la propagande djihadiste et des images d'extrême violence, le candidat à la primaire de la droite et du centre veut créer un «délit de complicité».

By Francisco S. Tatad
Jul 22 2016 (Manila Times)

Let us do this chronologically.

Days before the release on July 12 of the ruling of the Permanent Court of Arbitration, at The Hague, on the Philippine maritime dispute with China, Foreign Secretary Perfecto Yasay, Jr. announced he was willing to sit down with Beijing for bilateral talks on the possible joint exploration of mineral and marine resources of the disputed maritime areas in the South China (West Philippine) Sea.

Francisco S. Tatad

This was a pointed departure from the previous position of the Aquino government, which had insisted on a purely multilateral approach to the dispute, invoking international law under UNCLOS—the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. President Rodrigo DU30 did not correct or rebuke Yasay for his statement, so one assumed it had his full authority.

This apparently alarmed the US government, which had openly supported Aquino’s position and chided Beijing for its refusal to agree to arbitration and to recognize the jurisdiction of the arbitral body. On the eve of the release of the ruling, which everyone expected to be favorable to the Philippines, US Defense Secretary Ashton Carter telephoned Philippine Defense Secretary Delfin Lorenzana to talk about the impending verdict and its implications to the security of the region.

Kristie Kenney’s role
Hours before our “victory,” US State Department Counselor Kristie Kenney, a former ambassador to the Philippines, met with Yasay at the Department of Foreign Affairs “to call on the parties to respect the ruling.” This was completely ironic because the Philippine government was the only party to the arbitration, and could not have been expected to “disrespect” a ruling in its favor. If at all, the Philippines should be the one asking China to respect the ruling and the US to help persuade Beijing.

In reality, Kenney’s call was a rebuke to the newly initiated foreign secretary for his gratuitous statement on bilateral negotiations, which caught Washington totally by surprise. Nothing was reported from the Kenney-Yasay conversation, but when the ruling from The Hague came and profuse and euphoric reactions greeted it from the US, Japan, Australia and the European allies as well as from all sorts of netizens, Yasay had to welcome it in measured tones, calling for “sobriety” at the same time.

Albert del Rosario recycled
Former Foreign Secretary Albert del Rosario, who had been quoted as saying the Philippines would be a frontline state in containing China’s rise, and had engaged Beijing in steaming rhetoric on the South China Sea issue when he was still in office, was recycled out of wherever he was enjoying his retirement for publicity purposes, to speak actively about the ruling and receive the applause of the public who had yet to see our victory at the The Hague was completely psychic.

Yasay’s next opportunity to be heard came at the 11th Asia-Europe Summit Meeting, in Ulan Bator, Mongolia, on July 15 – 16, where on behalf of DU30, who was unable to attend, he called upon China to bind itself to the process it had rejected from the very start. He was somehow overshadowed in the press by Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe who pressed the point against China far more strongly than he did, prompting the Chinese government to point out that Japan was not a party to the issue at hand.

ASEM unmoved, FVR mooted
In its post-conference statement, ASEM refused to be drawn into the Philippines-China controversy, limiting itself to a general statement to the peaceful settlement of territorial disputes. Apparently, Yasay had some conversation with the Chinese delegation at the margins of the conference, but nothing came out of it in the press. Yasay’s performance provoked rumors of his early departure, prompting the President to issue a statement dismissing such possibility.

At the same time DU3O announced he was going to name former President Fidel V. Ramos as his special envoy to start talks with the Xi Jinping government. This was promptly welcomed by Beijing, and Ramos himself indicated genuine interest in it. But the latest word from Yasay is that there won’t be any talks with China, unless the latter agrees to discuss the PCA ruling, which it does not recognize.

Talks torpedoed?
This tends to show that some powerful actor has succeeded in torpedoing the rapprochement project, and that we should expect belligerent rhetoric and tension, which we were trying to arrest, to ratchet up. This means that the new DFA management never understood why bilateral talks were needed, in the face of a ruling that tends to create a worse crisis than the one it was seeking to ease.

To this observer the merit of bilateral talks was never in doubt. But the talks have to be without any preconditions. We just won the arbitral ruling, true; but no power on earth could compel China to recognize it. So why would China want to have talks with us that begin with a discussion of what it does not want to recognize? And what benefit do we hope to gain from it?

On the other hand, if we sit down to discuss ways and means of working together for peace and economic development without touching a gaping wound that’s still so fresh, China would most probably appreciate our generosity and try to match it to the fullest. This is the Asian way, unfamiliar to the West. Eventually, after we have been bonded by the strongest economic, social, cultural and human ties, we could perhaps begin to talk of the most difficult territorial problems between us.

A Korean tale
The story of a young Korean I had met on one of my earlier trips to Seoul seems most apt. He said he had a Japanese classmate with whom he fought on the first day they met—over the issue of Japan’s colonization of Korea from 1910 to 1945. The Japanese militarists had killed his parents, and he wanted to take it out on the young Japanese. He broke his nose, although he himself did not go unscathed. Despite this incident, he took pains to befriend his perceived nemesis.

They became such good friends that whenever any of his other friends would begin to talk of what the Japanese did to Korea in the past, he would immediately change the subject, and his Japanese friend would be profuse in his thanks. One day his friend asked about his dead parents, and if he could visit their graves to pay his respects. From then on, it became so easy for them to discuss their dark past.

GMA tried joint exploration
DU30 and Yasay were not the first ones to mention the possibility of joint exploration of marine and mineral resources in the South China (West Philippine) Sea. In 2004, during the Gloria Macapagal Arroyo administration, the Philippines and China already agreed to conduct joint exploration for oil and gas in the disputed waters. In March 2005, Vietnam became the third party to the Joint Maritime Seismic Undertaking (JMSU).

This, however, fell apart because of maritime incidents between China and Vietnam, and certain controversies involving China’s big business contracts in the Philippines. There was also a move to question the constitutionality of the JMSU before the Supreme Court. Senior Associate Justice Antonio Carpio, who has taken the lead in discussing the Philippine claim as against China’s so-called “nine-dash line” in various forums, maintains that any joint exploration with China as an equal partner would violate the Constitution, which permits foreigners not more than 40 percent equity in the exploitation of the country’s natural resources.

Marine Peace Park
But Carpio is willing to adopt the idea of Dr. John McManus, professor of Marine Biology and Fisheries at the University of Miami, that the disputed areas be converted into a Marine Peace Park for the benefit of all. This is not much different from a previous proposal in this column that the area be declared a common heritage of mankind, free from any kind of military weapons, particularly nuclear, or the political control of any nation, but for the benefit of all. This sounds like an idea whose time has come, although rather utopian; but I fear it would be immediately shot down by the military powers who see the South China Sea not only as the great waterway through which passes $5 trillion of the world’s annual trade but also as an irreplaceable playground for the world’s most powerful aircraft carriers, warships and submarines.

Without any means to compel China to comply with a ruling that invalidates its so-called “nine-dash line,” there is obvious need for the Philippines and China to talk and avoid inflammatory rhetoric and counterproductive political or military initiatives. As I have said a few times before, we have no need of war with China, nor can we afford it. Given our limited resources, how do we feed 1.3 billion Chinese, if they survive such a war, and should we win it?

US and China must talk
But since the real conflict is the geopolitical rivalry between the world’s lone superpower and Asia’s rising regional power, there is even more urgent need for them to sit down and discuss the terms upon which we are to build a new world order. The basic conflict is civilizational, and must be resolved as such.

As the British author and journalist Simon Winchester puts it in his book Pacific: Silicon Chips and Surfboards, Coral Reefs and Atom Bombs, Brutal Dictators, Fading Empires, and the Coming Collision of the World’s Superpowers, the Eastern civilization on the West side of the Pacific and the Western civilization on the East side of the Pacific have finally met to turn the Pacific into the inland sea of tomorrow, where the Mediterranean was the inland sea of the ancient world, and the Atlantic the inland sea of today. America has dominated the Pacific for the past 60 years, but its declining economic and political power has rendered it insecure about China’s phenomenal economic, political and military rise.

Search for equivalence, avoiding the ‘Thucydides Trap’
America needs to see, Winchester writes, that China is not interested in replacing or challenging the US as a world power. It does not intend to colonize, enslave or dominate any country or people like the Western powers, but simply wants to “enjoy equivalence.” This mistaken fear of China, left unchecked, could lead to what has been called the “Thucydides Trap,” in which a rising power causes fear in an established power which inevitably escalates toward war. We learn this from the History of the Peloponnesian War, which happened when after Athens and Sparta defeated Persia, Sparta’s growing fear of Athens led the two former allies to destroy each other.

In a major 2015 article in The Atlantic, Prof. Graham Allison of the Harvard Kennedy School of Government asked whether the US and China are headed for war because of the Thucydides Trap. A few years before that, Gen. Martin Dempsey, chair of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, in a speech before the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace on March 3, 2012, warned the US against falling into such a trap.

Chinese President Xi Jinping himself has said, “We all need to work together to avoid the ‘Thucydides Trap’—destructive tensions between an emerging power and established powers… Our aim is to foster a new model of major country relations.”

Indeed this can be avoided, not by demonizing the rising power or trying to prevent its rise, but by peaceful and constructive engagement, which begins to happen when the contending parties sit down without any preconditions to talk.

fstatad@gmail.com

This story was originally published by The Manila Times, Philippines

(B2) Parus récemment : Cout d’Etat en Turquie. Les Etats-Unis n’ont rien vu venir Feu vert sous condition au rachat d’Arianespace par Airbus Safran Launcher * Les Turcs… à la cantine. Le coup d’etat manqué bouleverse les plans d’EUFOR Althea Le Cyber, un nouveau domaine activé pour l’OTAN* Argus security obtient gain de cause devant […]

By Zubeida Mustafa
Jul 22 2016 (Dawn, Pakistan)

Qandeel Baloch’s horrific murder in the name of ‘honour’ is testimony to the failure of the women’s movement to overturn patriarchy in Pakistan. Against the backdrop of the spate of anti-women violence, comes a report by Dr Rubina Saigol written for the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, a German foundation. Titled Feminism and the Women’s Movement in Pakistan: Actors, Debates and Strategies, this excellent document should provide much food for thought.

The author, an eminent sociologist, touches the heart of the issue — especially in cases like Qandeel’s — when she points out that there are “silences” (neglected subjects) that surround questions of family and sexuality, the mainstay of patriarchy and women’s subjugation. These have generally not been addressed by the women’s movement and she recommends that they should be.

But that is not all. More than these silences, the author points out, feminists have failed to devise a successful strategy to empower women and create public spaces for them. That accounts for their inability to make a profound impact.

Feminists here never tried to be inclusive.

Dr Saigol observes that today there is “a deafening disquieting quiet in the women’s movement”. She quotes a number of well-known feminists who contend that Pakistan lacks an autonomous vigorous movement, notwithstanding the vocal female protests against the oppression of women.

She substantiates her argument by pointing to the absence of a “common collective vision of a better world, agreed upon strategies to create such a world, and shared understandings of the world in which we live and work”.

One would agree with the writer who traces the history of the women’s struggle in Pakistan to show how it evolved in response to internal politics and external events along with the globalisation that began in the post-cold war age.

But to formulate a unified stance has not been possible given the many serious constraints that exist, many of which are deeply rooted in our socio-cultural values, such as a general trend towards glorification of patriarchy that is reinforced by religion, the adversarial relationship between feminists and the state, and the depoliticisation of the women’s struggle. The impression conveyed is that the feminist movement has been a victim of circumstances — be they the induction of donor-driven NGOs or extremist religious ideologues in the country.

However, the women’s ‘movement’ in Pakistan has always been bifurcated by great schisms. At no stage was a common platform created where women of all views could gather on a minimal common agenda. The fact is that feminists of all shades never tried to be inclusive. Hence no group had the numerical strength to assert a claim to supremacy. WAF had the greatest potential for leadership due to its financial and political autonomy. Yet it never brought in its fold non-professional disadvantaged women who constitute the bulk of Pakistan’s female population. It focused on them only in nuanced consciousness-raising and, to its credit, condemned strongly individual cases of abuse of underprivileged women.

This activism didn’t go very far although it pushed the women’s issue on the national agenda. Some laws were changed but never implemented. The lives of the majority of women didn’t change. Though they support large families, as Qandeel did, they have to bow before patriarchy. They have no time to be mobilised to learn about their rights which they know would never be actualised.

However, the same women are willing to respond to a call which offers them services that to an extent facilitate them in fulfilling some of their basic needs. That is why various development NGOs working in the education and (reproductive) health sectors — even the donor-funded but honest ones — have been able to achieve more than the feminists in creating awareness of women’s rights.

Many of them have taken the indirect, but more effective, route to empower women and instil in them a vision of a better future. They understand the importance of female participation to create awareness in them. The next generation of women definitely show the promise of being more skilful in negotiating their way through rough patriarchal waters.

Had the advocacy groups tried to link up with the services groups they would have reinforced each others’ work. I remember the iconic development worker, Perween Rahman, lamenting the inability of the women’s movement to mobilise huge numbers to protest against injustices inflicted on women. She recognised the fact that women’s development was possible only if their rights were given full recognition. “But we are so busy attending to the basic needs of men and women that we have no time and resources to do advocacy. If the women’s rights movement were to join hands with us, we would definitely support them as that is what we also want.”

What needs to be recognised is that human development is an integrated and holistic process. To be effective, rights activists must address all areas and classes of human development simultaneously.

www.zubeidamustafa.com

This story was originally published by Dawn, Pakistan

VHS has come unspooled. It has been taped over. The screen has filled with static, then gone blank.

Dédicaces, conférences, expositions. Durant deux jours, le camp de Saint-Cyr-Coëtquidan va se transformer en salon du livre, pour la 7e édition du festival international du livre militaire. Ce week-end, à Saint-Cyr Coëtquidan, aura lieu le 7e festival du livre militaire (Film). « C’est la 7eédition, on s’affirme quant à ce qu’on veut faire, affirme Delphine Legrand, organisatrice ...

Une trentaine de jeunes Guadeloupéens et Guadeloupéennes effectuent actuellement une période militaire de découverte. Pendant 5 jours, ils découvriront les réalités de la vie militaire. « Avou » . Traduisez garde à vous. Les mains claquent sur les treillis, la trentaine de jeunes gens se redresse et se fige, mais pas assez vite au goût ...

ROYAUME-UNI Deux hommes ont tenté de kidnapper un soldat près d’une base de la Royal Air Force dans l’est de l’Angleterre… La piste terroriste n’est pas écartée. Un membre de la Royal Air Force, l’armée de l’air britannique, a été agressé mercredi après-midi à proximité de la base de Marham, dans le comté de Norfolk à ...

10.000 militaires et 15.000 membres de la réserve opérationnelle seront mobilisés en France d’ici la fin du mois. L’artillerie française sera également mise à la disposition de l’armée irakienne pour lutter contre Daech. Je lance un appel aux Français pour qu’ils fassent bloc » : à l’issue d’un nouveau Conseil de défense convoqué à l’Elysée ce vendredi 22 juillet ...

The teams from Russia, Israel, Italy, Bulgaria, Spain, Japan and the US also advanced to the finals.

Voyant le camion conduit par Mohamed Lahouaiej Bouhlel foncer sur la Promenade des Anglais de Nice le 14 Juillet, un homme sur un scooter a tenté de l'arrêter. Une semaine après l'attaque, il explique qu'il était alors prêt à mourir.

New Delhi (AFP) – L’Inde a lancé d’importantes recherches vendredi pour retrouver un avion de l’armée de l’air en route pour les îles indiennes d’Andaman et Nicobar, disparu avec 29 personnes à bord. Les avions de surveillance ainsi que des navires de la marine et des bateaux des gardes-côtes ont commencé les recherches pour retrouver ...

Un militaire tunisien a été tué aujourd’hui par l’explosion d’une mine posée par « des terroristes » dans une zone montagneuse du centre-ouest de la Tunisie, a indiqué à l’AFP le ministère de la Défense. « Un militaire est tombé en martyr lors de l’explosion vers 13h d’une mine posée par des terroristes », a précisé le porte-parole du ...

The journalist was killed on Wednesday morning in a car blast in Kiev as he was driving a colleague’s automobile.

A court in Belgrade confirmed an earlier judgment against the news portal E-novine for defaming the prominent Montenegrin journalist Milka Tadic Mijovic and ordered it to pay her about 8,000 euros.

Si les juges d’instruction suivent ces réquisitions, le Front national sera jugé pour complicité d’escroquerie dans le cadre des législatives de 2012 et recel d’abus de biens sociaux.