Credit: Oxfam
By Oxfam
LONDON, Jan 13 2026 (IPS)
The richest 1% have exhausted their annual carbon budget – the amount of CO2 that can be emitted while staying within 1.5 degrees of warming – only ten days into the year, according to new analysis from Oxfam. The richest 0.1% already used up their carbon limit on the 3rd January.
This day – named by Oxfam as ‘Pollutocrat Day’ – highlights how the super-rich are disproportionately responsible for driving the climate crisis.
The emissions of the richest 1% generated in one year alone will cause an estimated 1.3 million heat-related deaths by the end of the century. Decades of over consumption of emissions by the world’s super rich are also causing significant economic damage to low and lower-middle income countries, which could add up to $44 trillion by 2050.
To stay within the 1.5 degrees limit, the richest 1% would have to slash their emissions by 97% by 2030. Meanwhile, those who have done the least to cause the climate crisis – including communities in poorer and climate-vulnerable countries, Indigenous groups, women and girls – will be the worst impacted.
“Time and time again, the research shows that governments have a very clear and simple route to drastically slash carbon emissions and tackle inequality: by targeting the richest polluters.
By cracking down on the gross carbon recklessness of the super-rich, global leaders have an opportunity to put the world back on track for climate targets and unlock net benefits for people and the planet,” said Oxfam’s Climate Policy Lead Nafkote Dabi.
On top of their lifestyle emissions, the super-rich are also investing in the most polluting industries. Oxfam’s research finds that each billionaire carries, on average, an investment portfolio in companies that will produce 1.9 million tonnes of CO2 a year, further locking the world into climate breakdown.
The wealthiest individuals and corporations also hold disproportionate power and influence. The number of lobbyists from fossil fuel companies attending the recent COP summit in Brazil, for example, was more than any delegation apart from the host nation, with 1600 attendees.
“The immense power and wealth of super-rich individuals and corporations have also allowed them to wield unjust influence over policymaking and water down climate negotiations.” Dabi added.
Oxfam calls on governments to slash the emissions of the super-rich and make rich polluters pay through:
Increase taxes on income and wealth of the Super-rich and proactively support and engage on the negotiations for the UN Convention of International Tax Cooperation to deliver a fairer global architecture.
Excess profit taxes on fossil fuel corporations. A Rich Polluter Profits Tax on 585 oil, gas and coal companies could raise up to US $400 billion in its first year, equivalent to the cost of climate damages in the Global South.
Ban or punitively tax carbon-intensive luxury items like super-yachts and private jets. The carbon footprint of a super-rich European, accumulated from nearly a week of using super yachts and private jets, matches the lifetime carbon footprint of someone in the world’s poorest 1 percent
Build an equal economic system that puts people and planet first by rejecting dominant neoliberal economics and moving towards an economy based on sustainability and equality.
The International Court of Justice (ICJ), the world’s highest court, has confirmed that countries have a legal obligation to reduce emissions enough to protect the universal rights to life, food, health, and a clean environment.
IPS UN Bureau
Follow @IPSNewsUNBureau
La Maison de la Culture de Ouidah accueille depuis ce jeudi 8 janvier 2026 l'exposition « Territoires croisés, Sagesse des ancêtres » de l'artiste plasticien béninois Benjamin Deguénon, dans le cadre des Vodun Days. Le vernissage a eu lieu en présence de la Conseillère technique aux Arts au Ministère du Tourisme, de la Culture et des Arts, de l'Ambassadeur du Royaume des Pays-Bas près le Bénin, ainsi que de nombreux invités et acteurs du monde culturel.
« Territoires croisés, Sagesse des ancêtres » est l'aboutissement d'un projet artistique initié dans le cadre des Vodun Days et mûri au cours d'une résidence de trois (03) mois au European Ceramic Workcentre aux Pays-Bas. Une expérience rendue possible grâce au soutien de l'Ambassade du Royaume des Pays-Bas près le Bénin, qui a accompagné l'artiste Benjamin Deguénon dans cette démarche de création et d'expérimentation.
À travers ses œuvres, l'artiste met en scène la parole et le dialogue des ancêtres. « L'exposition “Territoires croisés, Sagesse des ancêtres” parle de rencontres culturelles, de mémoire, du chemin que nous faisons aujourd'hui. J'ai fait dialoguer le passé et le présent pour rappeler que la sagesse des ancêtres n'est pas oubliée, qu'elle est encore vivante et qu'elle doit nous inspirer pour une meilleure continuité », a-t-il confié.
Dans son discours, l'Ambassadeur du Royaume des Pays-Bas près le Bénin, Joris Jurriëns, s'est réjoui de la vitalité de la diplomatie culturelle entre les deux pays.
« Notre focus est de construire et d'élargir les liens culturels existants entre le Bénin et le Royaume des Pays-Bas de manière équilibrée. Ces liens sont fondés sur notre histoire commune de l'esclavage », a-t-il déclaré.
Le Vodun, souligne l'ambassadeur, constitue un élément central de ces liens, avec une influence importante sur la culture et les rites. Pour lui, le projet de Benjamin Deguénon incarne parfaitement le dialogue interculturel entre le Bénin et les Pays-Bas dans le domaine de la création artistique contemporaine. « Dans les œuvres de Benjamin, on retrouve les cultures historiques des deux pays, les traditions vodun du Bénin et les techniques du Bleu de Delft des Pays-Bas, combinées dans l'art contemporain », a-t-il indiqué.
« Silence des ancêtres » est l'une des œuvres phares de cette exposition. Benjamin Deguénon décrit cette pièce comme un hommage aux ancêtres maltraités durant la colonisation. « Si les ancêtres devaient punir toute la barbarie qui a eu lieu dans le temps, nous ne pourrions pas accepter le brassage des cultures aujourd'hui. Ce silence parle. Il nous rappelle le pardon, la nécessité de savoir pardonner, de laisser derrière nous certaines choses pour avancer », confie l'artiste.
La Conseillère technique aux Arts au Ministère du Tourisme, de la Culture et des Arts, Carole Borna, a relevé la profondeur symbolique de l'exposition : « Cette exposition nous propose bien plus qu'un simple accrochage d'œuvres. Elle nous invite à une traversée de l'histoire, de la mémoire et de l'intime ».
Selon elle, l'art de Benjamin Deguénon se construit par strates, à l'image de la mémoire elle-même. « Plastiquement, l'artiste travaille la matière avec une grande liberté, convoquant peinture, dessin et texture pour produire des œuvres où rien n'est décoratif, où chaque marque fait signe, où chaque dessin devient sens », a-t-elle souligné.
Carole Borna a salué la collaboration entre le Ministère du Tourisme, de la Culture et des Arts et l'Ambassade des Pays-Bas, permettant aux artistes de s'inscrire dans la durée, d'expérimenter et de contribuer pleinement à une économie créative dynamique. « Soutenir l'art contemporain, ce n'est pas seulement exposer des œuvres, c'est soutenir des parcours, des imaginaires, des filières entières », a-t-elle affirmé.
L'exposition « Territoires croisés, Sagesse des ancêtres » est accessible au public à la Maison de la Culture de Ouidah durant tout le mois de janvier. Elle offre aux visiteurs une immersion sensible dans un univers où mémoire, histoire et création contemporaine se rencontrent pour mettre en lumière la sagesse des ancêtres.
A.A.A
Credit: United Nations
By Thalif Deen
UNITED NATIONS, Jan 13 2026 (IPS)
Judging by the mass US withdrawal from 66 UN entities, including UN conventions and international treaties, is it remotely possible that the unpredictable Trump administration may one day decide to pull out of the UN, and force the Secretariat out of New York– despite the 1947 UN-US headquarters agreement?
Besides the 66, the withdrawals also include the pullouts from the Human Rights Council, the WHO, UNRWA and UNESCO– while imposing drastic reductions in funding for the remaining UN entities the US has not yet formally exited.
So, will the United Nations, which has come under heavy fire, be far behind?
That possibility is strengthened by the critical views of the UN both by President Trump and senior US officials.
Dr Stephen Zunes, Professor of Politics, University of San Francisco, who has written extensively on issues relating to the United Nations, told IPS even the U.S. presidents most hostile to the United Nations– like Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush– recognized the importance of the world body in terms of advancing U.S. interests, including understanding the importance of maintaining the UN system as a whole, even while violating certain legal principles in particular cases.
Similarly, he pointed out, the United States was willing to participate in various UN bodies in an effort to wield influence, even while disagreeing with some of their policies or even their overall mandates.
“The Trump administration, however, appears to be rejecting the post-WWII international legal system as a whole. His statements, particularly since the attack on Venezuela, appear to be a throwback to the 19th-century imperial prerogatives and a rejection of modern international law.”
“As a result, it is possible that Trump could indeed pull the United States out of the United Nations and force the UN out of New York”, declared Dr Zunes.
Addressing the General Assembly last September, Trump remarked, “What is the purpose of the United Nations? It’s not even coming close to living up to [its] potential.”
Dismissing the U.N. as an outdated, ineffective organization, he boasted, “I ended seven wars, dealt with the leaders of each and every one of these countries, and never a phone call from the United Nations offering to help in finalizing the deal.”
Martin S. Edwards, Associate Dean of Academic and Student Affairs, School of Diplomacy and International Relations at Seton Hall University, told IPS “this is dubious language about cutting inefficiency and fighting diversity wrapped up in red meat to feed President Trump’s base”.
It’s a ploy to use foreign affairs to distract voters for whom he has yet to deliver. The fact that the actual follow-up documents haven’t been received by the Secretary General tells you everything here. It fits a pattern of the President carving out maximalist positions and then getting very little in the end, he pointed out.
But it’s a bigger challenge, he said, on two fronts:
1. This is going to continue to REDUCE US influence at the UN rather than increase it. Stable foreign relations are based on credibility. The US continues to squander its reserves, and other countries will step into the vacuum.
2. This policy might have been a good social media post for voters, but makes little sense in practice. What the White House wants is a line-item veto over every single aspect of UN operations. But assessed contributions are not an ala carte menu, declared Edwards.
Mandeep S. Tiwana, Secretary General, CIVICUS, a global alliance of civil society organizations, told IPS retreat from international institutions by the Trump Administration is an attack on the legacy of President Franklin D. Roosevelt who gave the people of the United States the New Deal and envisioned a bold framework for the establishment of the UN to overcome the horrors of the Second World War.
“Many of the impacted international institutions were built through the blood, sweat and tears of Americans. Pulling out of these institutions is an affront to their sacrifices and reverses decades of multilateral cooperation on peace, human rights, climate change and sustainable development,” he said.
Meanwhile, the attacks on the UN have continued unabated.
In an interview with Breitbart News, U.S. Representative to the United Nations Ambassador Mike Waltz said, “A quarter of everything the UN does, the United States pays for”.
“Is there money being well spent? I’d say right now, no, because it’s being spent on all of these other woke projects, rather than what it was originally intended to do, what President Trump wants it to do, and what I want it to do, which is focus on peace.”
Historically, the United States has been the largest financial contributor, typically covering around 22% of the UN’s regular budget and up to 28% of the peacekeeping budget.
Still, ironically, the US is also the biggest defaulter. According to the UN’s Administrative and Budgetary Committee, member states currently owe $1.87 billion of the $3.5 billion in mandatory contributions for the current budget cycle.
The former US House Republican Conference Chair Elise Stefanik of New York, a one-time nominee for the post of US Ambassador to the UN, was quoted as saying, “In the UN, Americans see a corrupt, defunct, and paralyzed institution more beholden to bureaucracy, process, and diplomatic niceties than the founding principles of peace, security, and international cooperation laid out in its charter.”
Meanwhile, in a veiled attack on the UN, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said, “What we term the “international system” is now overrun with hundreds of opaque international organizations, many with overlapping mandates, duplicative actions, ineffective outputs, and poor financial and ethical governance.”
Even those that once performed useful functions, he pointed out, have increasingly become inefficient bureaucracies, platforms for politicized activism or instruments contrary to our nation’s best interests, he said.
“Not only do these institutions not deliver results, they obstruct action by those who wish to address these problems. The era of writing blank checks to international bureaucracies is over,” declared Rubio
IPS UN Bureau Report
Follow @IPSNewsUNBureau
L’asthme représente un enjeu majeur de santé publique qui touche environ 262 millions de personnes dans le monde, selon l’Organisation Mondiale de la Santé (OMS). […]
L’article Comprendre l’asthme : diagnostic, facteurs de risque et prise en charge globale est apparu en premier sur .