In the aftermath of the EU-Turkey Agreement reached on the 18th March 2016, a group of students of the Master’s Degree in European and International Studies of the University of Trento started to question themselves on this deal and, more in general, on the future of the EU. These reflections have been then shared with other students and organisations all over Europe and finally led to the foundation of a working group, called OpenUpEurope – A European Citizens’ Initiative.
Recalling Art. 2 of the TUE, the group of young European citizens expresses the hope that the EU still continues to be “founded on the values of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights”.
“We all grew up believing that these values were at the basis of our society and our culture; fundamental pillars on which we should base our life and our relationships with others”. However, they say, “here we see those same principles disintegrating”. In fact, dealing with the so called “refugee crisis”, many action were taken all around Europe which challenge the fundamental EU values. These include the reintroduction of border controls, asylum seekers living in inhumane conditions even within the EU territory, Member States against the reception of refugees, the rise of racist and xenophobic movements and, last but not least, the respect for freedom of expression and information sacrificed to shift the burden of asylum and migration management to Turkey.
This is not the EU these students want, this is not the Union of all European citizens that believe in these values.
“We do not want and we cannot accept that the founding values of the EU could be flouted. On the contrary, we want to believe that something could be done to put them into practice. We want to express our European citizenship fighting against the human rights violations occurring right before our very eyes.”
For this reason, the OpenUpEurope group opposes the EU-Turkey agreement and its implementation, sharing many of the concerns raised by the UN Refugee Agency and many NGOs, such as Amnesty International. To this end, this group wants to launch a European Citizen’s Initiative addressing the current European policy on immigration and asylum for the defence and promotion of the founding European values.
The Initiative would be intended to ask the Commission to:
In addition, the group wants to request to officially condemn and sanction Member States’ positions or political movements that openly violate the European fundamental values.
The group, mainly composed of students, is currently looking for technical and legal advice in order to verify the feasibility of its idea and to improve it. Therefore, they would be deeply grateful for the possibility of relying on experts’ opinions. They need advice on how to translate the different aims expressed into one single concrete proposal.
OpenUpEurope is a group of students, a group of European citizens coming from different backgrounds. What they all have in common is the determination to use the ECI channel in order to reach the decision-making core of the EU. “We cannot and do not want to remain just spectators of the current policies”.
Let us work together, let us defend the EU founding values and create a European Union based on solidarity.
Adele Cornaglia
If you would like to join the group and give your support, please contact on Facebook:
Francesca Capoluongo,
Adele Cornaglia,
or send an email to: openupeurope@gmail.com
Comment ne pas désespérer de la Belgique? Impossible face à l’évaporation accélérée de ce pays. Mon analyse est ici. Le Monde l’avait écrit le 23 novembre dernier, mais j’avais trouvé à l’époque qu’ils y allaient trop fort alors que l’on n’avait toujours pas fini d’analyser les défaillances françaises. Cinq mois après, personne ne peut plus nier que la Belgique est un «failed State», un Etat en voie de déliquescence.
Passenger name record (PNR) data is personal information provided by passengers and collected and held by air carriers. It includes information such as the name of passengers, travel dates, itineraries, seats, baggage, contact details and means of payment. The proposal for a directive, presented by the Commission, aims at regulating the transfer of such PNR data to member states’ law enforcement authorities and their processing for the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime.
The European Parliament and the Council agreed on a compromise text in December 2015. On 14 April 2016, the European Parliament adopted its position. The Council then adopted the directive on 21 April 2016. Member states will have two years to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this directive.
After a five years long series of delays and setbacks the new directive regulating the use of Passenger Name Record (PNR) data in the EU for the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime was approved by the Parliament on Thursday 14 April.
Despite strong criticism from the left side, the issue was pushed to the top of the Parliament’s agenda following the recent terrorist attacks in Paris and Brussels. In fact, some objections were moved, especially the Greens and the Liberals, concerning the fact that each country will keep control of its own database, the vague nature of data collected and the length of time passenger information may be stored.
Although there was little suspense regarding the positive outcome of the vote, a number of MEPs, such as the Dutch Liberal Sophie in’t Veld, tried to derail the PNR dossier by tabling amendments that would change the essence of the compromise. At the end, the text was approved by MEPs for 461 votes to 179, with 9 abstentions.
The Greens have consistently criticized the proposed system, which, according to them, will fail to address the terrorist threat, whilst undermining the fundamental lights of EU citizens. After the vote, Green MEP and home affairs spokesperson Jan Philipp Albrecht said:
« This EU PNR system is a false solution, based on the flawed political obsession with mass surveillance. PNR is a placebo at best, which will not only undermine the fundamental rights of EU citizens but also undermine the security of our societies by diverting badly-needed resources from security and intelligence tools that could actually be useful for combating terrorism, like targeted surveillance.”
Despite all the negative evaluations, British conservative and PNR rapporteur, Timothy Kirkhope said: “There were understandable concerns about the collection and storage or people’s data, but I believe that the directive puts in place data safeguards, as well as proving that the law is proportionate to the risks we face. EU governments must now get on with implementing this agreement »
French Home Affairs Minister, Bernard Cazeneuve, who had been fighting intensively for the adoption of this system since the Paris attacks of January 2015 and the attacks of November, welcomed the outcome and this “vital step in stepping up the fight against terrorism in Europe”.
Under the new directive, air carriers will be obliged to provide member states’ authorities with the PNR data for flights entering or departing from the EU. It will also allow, but not oblige, member states to collect PNR data concerning selected intra-EU flights. However, considering the current security situation in Europe, all member states declared that by the date of transposition of the directive they will make full use of the possibility provided for by Article 2 which states that selected intra-EU flights could be included.
Thus, under the new rules, each member state will also be required to set up a so-called Passenger Information Unit (PIU’s), which will receive the PNR data from the air carriers.
The new rules create an EU standard for the use of such data and include provisions on:
Member states could then extend the directive to “intra-EU” flights (i.e. from an EU country to one or more other EU countries), if they notify it to the EU Commission. EU countries may also choose to collect and process PNR data from travel agencies and tour operators (non-carrier economic operators), as they also manage flight bookings.
There will be also guaranties applied to safeguard data protection:
Under the new directive, air carriers will be obliged to provide member states’ authorities with the PNR data for flights entering or departing from the EU. Member states will have two years to incorporate the text into national law but at least 16 States already have a national PNR system.
Elena Dal Monte
For further information: