Agrégateur de flux

Monday 9 February

Source : © European Union, 2026 - EP

Monday 9 February

Source : © European Union, 2026 - EP

Monday 9 February

Source : © European Union, 2026 - EP

Monday 9 February

Source : © European Union, 2026 - EP

La vie politique irakienne connaît un moment charnière depuis les élections législatives du 11 novembre 2025, au cours desquellesles électeurs ont désigné les 329 membres du Conseil des représentants, le Parlement monocaméral de la République d’Irak. Ce scrutin s’est tenu dans un contexte de crise durable de légitimité du système politique, malgré lesréformes engagées à la suite du mouvement de contestation d’octobre 2019 (Tishreen).

Fondé sur un partage confessionnel et ethnique du pouvoir (muhasasa), l’ordre politique irakien est régulièrement dénoncé pour son incapacité à produire une gouvernance efficace et responsable. Si le Tishreen a dénoncé les pratiques de corruption, de clientélisme et d’ingérence extérieure, les élections qui ont suivi ont jusqu’ici mis en évidence la capacité du système à absorber les chocs sans se réformer.

Plus qu’un simple exercice démocratique, ce scrutin révèle les rapports de force profonds du pays : recomposition des blocs, rôle pivot des partis kurdes et primauté des négociations de coulisses. Ces élections ouvrent-elles enfin la voie à une réforme du système, ou confirmentelles la survie d’un ordre capable de durer par l’inertie ?

À télécharger

• Lire la note (PDF)

L’article Irak 2025 : un pluralisme de façade au service du statu quo ? est apparu en premier sur IRIS.

La Convention pour le respect des droits de l’homme (CRDH) exhorte l’armée congolaise à anticiper d’éventuelles attaques des rebelles ADF dans le territoire d’Irumu, province de l’Ituri.

Dans un entretien accordé lundi 9 février à Radio Okapi, Christophe Munyanderu, responsable de l’ONG dans la région, affirme que ces rebelles seraient présents dans plusieurs localités proches de la Route nationale numéro 4 (RN4).

Credit: Port Vila Market, Vanuatu – Kevin Hellon / shutterstock.com

By Tobias Ide
Feb 9 2026 (IPS)

 
The Pacific Island countries are at the frontline of climate change. Their territories mostly consist of small, low-lying islands, with long coastlines and vast ocean spaces between them. Many livelihoods are based on agriculture or fishing, and importing water or food is often infeasible or expensive. This makes those large ocean nations highly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change, such as storms, droughts, and rising sea levels. Analysts have expressed concerns that this can result in various forms of socio-political conflict.

However, the Pacific Island countries have received scarce attention in research on climate change and conflict. This is surprising given the Pacific Island countries’ high climate vulnerability and increasing geopolitical relevance. A few years back, a Nature article did not find a single peer-reviewed study on the climate-conflict nexus in the Pacific. And while recent work added important insights on potential pathways between climate and conflict in the Pacific Island countries, the region remains understudied.

A new study tackles this knowledge gap by systematically collecting data on conflict events (such as protests, riots, and communal violence) in Fiji, Solomon Islands, and Vanuatu. It then determines statistical associations between the occurrence of such conflicts—protests, riots, communal violence etc.—and climate extremes like storms, heatwaves, and floods. The results are surprising.

Climate extremes do not drive conflict risks

The researchers found that climate disasters are not a significant predictor of conflict events. This is true for both cities and rural areas. In cities, high values of (and competition for) land, immigration after disasters, and opportunities for political mobilisation have long been considered to make climate-related conflicts more likely, yet no such statistical signal was detected. Even when looking only at conflicts around natural resources like water or forests, climate extremes are not a good predictor.

These findings could nuance common wisdom about climate change and conflict. Experts from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) have concluded that climate change increases conflict risks, even though other conflict drivers are more important. Such a linkage is particularly likely in climate vulnerable regions with a history of political instability, and it is also more applicable to low-intensity conflicts like protests (as compared to large-scale violence like civil wars). Yet, the study focuses on such smaller-scale conflict. Fiji, Solomon Island, and Vanuatu are also highly vulnerable to climate change and suffered through political instability (coups, civil war, and unrest) in the past.

How to make sense of the absence of conflict

As a starting point, it is important to clarify three things. First, the absence of conflict does not necessarily imply peace, particularly if those least responsible for climate change suffer most from its consequences. Second, the study focuses on visible and collective forms of conflict. Disasters, but also competition for disaster-related support schemes, might well result in lower-level, less visible forms of conflict, such as household and intimate partner violence or lower social cohesion within communities. Studying these forms of conflict is certainly a key task for future work. Third, evidence is not perfect. The new study, for instance, covers only the period 2012 to 2020, studies just three Pacific Island countries, and could not include rainfall anomalies due to a lack of data.

That said, the absence of a correlation between climate extremes and socio-political conflict events is still noteworthy. It indicates the Pacific Islands have significant levels of agency and resilience. This is not to romanticise local communities and national governments—as everywhere in the world, they have their share of tensions and shortcomings. But the Pacific Island countries possess well-established traditional institutions and, at least in some areas, strong community and civil society networks. Given their remote location, tropical climate, and oceanic geography, they have plenty of knowledge and experience in dealing with climate extremes like droughts, floods, and storms as well. These are important assets for coping peacefully with the impacts of climate change.

Consider the example of Vanuatu after cyclone Pam in 2015. Despite being one of the most intense storms to ever hit the South Pacific, the death toll was relatively low, and the country recovered rather quickly from its impacts. This was the case because local community structures and NGO-led Community Climate Change Committees coordinated well, and they thus played a key role in preparing for the storm and in delivering disaster relief and recovery. These activities did not just utilise but also strengthened traditional social networks. Furthermore, state institutions effectively utilised the inflow of international aid to deal with the cyclone’s impacts, thereby increasing trust in the government. Consequentially, no major conflicts erupted in the aftermath of Pam.

Avoid doomsday thinking – and provide tailored support

Which insights can decision makers draw from these findings?

It is important to avoid doomsday scenarios when thinking about climate change in the Pacific. For sure, the respective countries are highly exposed to and quite vulnerable to climate change. But if policy makers and media portray the Pacific Island countries as helpless victims of climate change and prone to conflict, the consequences are problematic: a lack of economic investment, external support mostly focussed on relocation, and an ignorance of local capacities.

By contrast, emphasising how Pacific communities successfully deal with and maintain peace in the context of climate change provides different perspectives. It highlights how local communities and state institutions (despite not being perfect) have significant capacities for climate change adaptation and bottom-up peacebuilding. National governments and international donors should utilise those capacities by providing tailored support, responding to the needs and priorities of those on the frontline of climate change. Rather than preliminary resignation or relocation, this can support the building of climate-resilient peace.

Related articles:
There Is No Security Without Development, Anything Else Is a Distraction
Do We Need a Pacific Peace Index?
The Trump Presidency and Climate Security in the Indo-Pacific Region

Tobias Ide is Associate Professor in Politics and International Relations at Murdoch University Perth. Until recently, he was also Adjunct Associate Professor of International Relations at the Brunswick University of Technology. He has published widely on the intersections of the environment, climate change, peace, conflict and security, including in Global Environmental Change, International Affairs, Journal of Peace Research, Nature Climate Change, and World Development. He is also a director of the Environmental Peacebuilding Association.

This article was issued by the Toda Peace Institute and is being republished from the original with their permission.

IPS UN Bureau

 

Follow @IPSNewsUNBureau
!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],p=/^http:/.test(d.location)?'http':'https';if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src=p+'://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js';fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document, 'script', 'twitter-wjs');  

The satellite internet service's arrival offers hope for connectivity in mountainous regions, but pricing and state control remain concerns.

A Adjohoué Azéhounholi, une localité de la commune de Covè, dans le département du Zou, deux motocyclistes ont laissé tomber par inadvertance un sac contenant une tête humaine. L'enquête ouverte par la Police a permis d'interpeller le présumé propriétaire, samedi 7 février 2026, au quartier Ahito, dans l'arrondissement de Zogba.

Un présumé trafiquant d'organes humains dans les mailles de la Police à Covè. Le mis en cause selon une source policière, se déplaçait au moyen d'une motocyclette de marque Bajaj avec une autre personne. Arrivée à hauteur de la localité de Adjohoué Azéhounholi non loin du CEG 5, les deux individus laissent tomber par inadvertance un colis contenant une tête humaine.
Selon les témoins, les deux hommes auraient dans un premier temps tenté de récupérer leur macabre fardeau. Mais, « au regard des curieux interloqués qui se regroupaient », ils auraient rapidement renoncé, « faisant contre mauvaise fortune bon cœur » avant de prendre la fuite avec leur engin, abandonnant le colis sur les lieux.
L'enquête a permis de localiser le présumé propriétaire dans un cabaret du quartier Ahito, dans l'arrondissement de Zogba. Interrogé sur la provenance du colis, il a d'abord clamé son innocence avec véhémence déclarant qu'il « n'a pas fait tomber une tête humaine de sa moto » ; alors même que les enquêteurs ne lui ont pas parlé de la nature du colis ».
Placé en garde à vue, il répondra de ses actes devant les autorités compétentes. Les investigations se poursuivent pour identifier ses complices.

F. A. A.

Nature-positive business operations can contribute to both business success and the environment, according to IPBES’ Business Biodiversity Assessment. Credit: iStock/IPBES

By Busani Bafana
BULAWAYO, Zimbabwe & MANCHESTER, United Kingdom, Feb 9 2026 (IPS)

Business can still remain profitable while protecting the environment but invest in nature-positive operations, says a landmark report by the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), which finds that global companies have contributed to the escalating loss of biodiversity.

The IPBES Methodological Assessment Report on the Impact and Dependence of Business on Biodiversity and Nature’s Contributions to People, known as the Business and Biodiversity Report, says global business has benefited from nature but has immensely contributed to the decline in biodiversity. It is time it changes how it does business because biodiversity decline is a “critical systemic risk threatening the economy, financial stability, and human well-being.”

The global economy, driven by business, is dependent on healthy biodiversity and nature for materials, climate regulation, clean water, and pollination. However, the current economic system treats nature as free and infinite, creating perverse incentives for its exploitation. Businesses are largely rewarded for short-term profit, even when their activities degrade the natural systems they rely on, creating a huge risk to the economy and society, the report said.

The cover of the Business and Biodiversity Report. Credit: IPBES

It Must Be Business Unusual Now

Approved at the recent 12th session of the IPBES Plenary, held in Manchester, United Kingdom, the report calls for the end of business as usual. Global businesses, heavily dependent on nature and impacted by nature, must quickly change their operations or face collapse.

“Businesses and other key actors can either lead the way towards a more sustainable global economy or ultimately risk extinction… both of species in nature but potentially also their own,” noted the report.

Based on thousands of sources and prepared over three years by 79 leading experts from 35 countries from all regions of the world, the report is the first assessment of the impacts and dependencies of business on biodiversity and nature’s contributions to people.

Current conditions perpetuate business as usual and do not support the transformative change necessary to halt and reverse biodiversity loss, said the report, pointing out that large subsidies that drive biodiversity losses are directed to business activities with the support of businesses and trade associations.

For example, in 2023, global public and private finance flows with directly negative impacts on nature were estimated at USD 7.3 trillion. Of this amount, private finance accounted for USD 4.9 trillion, with public spending on environmentally harmful subsidies at about USD 2.4 trillion, the report said.

In contrast, USD 220 billion in public and private finance flows were directed to activities contributing to the conservation and restoration of biodiversity, representing just 3 percent of the public funds and incentives that encourage harmful business behaviour or prevent behaviour beneficial to biodiversity.

The new report shows that business as usual is not inevitable – with the right policies, as well as financial and cultural shifts, what is good for nature is also what is best for profitability, said Prof. Stephen Polasky, co-chair of the assessment, who highlighted that the loss of biodiversity was among the most serious threats to business.

“Business as usual may once have seemed profitable in the short term, but impacts across multiple businesses can have cumulative effects, aggregating to global impacts, which can cross ecological tipping points,” Polasky said.

Polasky said during a press briefing today (February 9, 2026) that business can immediately act without waiting for governments to create an enabling environment. They can measure their impact and dependencies by increasing the efficiencies of their operation, reducing waste and understanding new business opportunities and products.

A 2019 Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services by IPBES warned that one million species face extinction in the next few years as a result of overexploitation of resources, development, and other human activities, posing serious consequences for people and the planet.

Global business, which turns profits from nature, has contributed to the loss of biodiversity as a result of poor production practices that have poisoned river systems, emitted dangerous high greenhouse gases and led to land degradation. This is despite business being affected by natural disasters, from extreme weather floods and droughts to climate change.

The report is the latest assessment by IPBES, an independent intergovernmental body comprising more than 150 member governments. IPBES, often described as the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) for biodiversity, provides policymakers with objective scientific assessments about the state of knowledge regarding the planet’s biodiversity, ecosystems and the contributions they make to people.

IPBES Chair, David Oburo,  said the assessments done by IPBES are balanced by the knowledge systems needed to integrate information business and its impacts and dependencies on biodiversity.

He said there is a need to move away from the scientific language often used in talking about impacts and dependencies of businesses to simplifying it to be about risks and opportunities “so that the messaging that comes out from our assessments is really accessible to the audience that needs to access that information.”

The IPBES methodological assessment report warned that the current system was broken because what is profitable for businesses often results in loss of biodiversity.

A Peruvian indigenous Quechua woman weaving a textile with the traditional techniques in Cusco, Peru. The IPBES Business and Biodiversity Report suggests business should integrate Indigenous knowledge into their operations. Credit: iStock/IPBES

IPBES Executive Secretary, Luthando Dziba, said nature was everybody’s business. The conservation and restorative use of biodiversity is central to business success. Although businesses have contributed to innovations that have driven improvement of living standards, that same success had come at the cost of biodiversity.

An Enabling Environment Is Good for Biodiversity

The report offers a key solution of creating a new “enabling environment” where what is profitable for business aligns with what is good for biodiversity and society. Current conditions — laws, financial systems, corporate reporting rules, and cultural norms — do not reward businesses for protecting nature.

There are many barriers to protecting nature, such as the focus on short-term profits versus long-term ecological cycles. In addition, there is a lack of mandatory disclosure and accountability for environmental impacts, inadequate data, metrics, and capacity within the business community, as well as the failure to integrate Indigenous and local knowledge in biodiversity protection.

The creation of an enabling environment needs coordinated action policy and legal frameworks where governments should integrate biodiversity into all trade and sectoral policies. Besides, there is a need to redirect the USD 7.3 trillion in harmful flows using taxes, green bonds, and sustainability-linked loans to reward positive action.

Businesses must engage with Indigenous Peoples and local communities with Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC), while access to and sharing of location-specific data on business activities and biodiversity should be improved.  Leverage technology such as remote sensing and artificial intelligence for better monitoring and traceability across business supply chains.

Measure It to Manage It

Another key finding of the report is that business could improve the measurement and management of its impacts and dependencies on nature through appropriate engagement with science and Indigenous and local knowledge.

Assessment co-chair Prof. Ximena Rueda noted that data and knowledge are often siloed, as scientific literature was not written for businesses. Besides, a lack of translation and attention to the needs of business has slowed uptake of scientific findings.

“Among business there is also often limited understanding and recognition of Indigenous Peoples and local communities as stewards of biodiversity and, therefore, holders of knowledge on its conservation, restoration and sustainable use,” said Rueda in a statement.

Industrial development threatens 60 percent of Indigenous lands around the world, and a quarter of all Indigenous territories are under high pressure from resource exploitation. However, Indigenous Peoples and local communities often find themselves inadequately represented in business research and decision-making, said the report.

Commenting on the report, Astrid Schomaker, Executive Secretary of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), noted that while all businesses depend on nature, some were more exposed to risks stemming from resource depletion and environmental degradation. She said companies need a deeper understanding of the breadth of their dependencies and impacts on biodiversity to act better.

“In too many boardrooms and offices around the world, there is still a dearth of awareness of biodiversity protection as a business investment,” said Schomaker in a statement. “Too often, public policy still incentivises behaviour that drives biodiversity loss.”

While Alexander De Croo, Administrator, United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), said too often biodiversity is an invisible and expendable asset on a balance sheet of global companies, but that was changing.

“Awareness is now accelerating of the risks to development if biodiversity fails—and of the economic opportunities and future prosperity that emerge where it thrives,” De Croo said.

The report underscored that we cannot business-as-usual our way out of the biodiversity crisis. Governments need to stop incentivising the destruction of biodiversity and start rewarding environmental stewardship. Besides, business leaders should now integrate natural capital accounting into their business strategy to disclose their environmental footprint while contributing to a positive global economy.

The evidence is clear: our economic prosperity is inextricably linked to nature’s health, and we are severing that vital link at our peril.

IPS UN Bureau Report

 

Follow @IPSNewsUNBureau
!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],p=/^http:/.test(d.location)?'http':'https';if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src=p+'://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js';fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document, 'script', 'twitter-wjs');   Related Articles

• Support Science in Halting Global Biodiversity Crisis—King Charles
• Explainer: Why Nature Is Everyone’s Business

Takaichi has the largest majority of any Japanese PM since World War II. Now she must decide how to tackle Japan’s difficult strategic environment.

Plus de douze ans après l’assassinat de Ghislaine Dupont et Claude Verlon au Mali, le juge d’instruction antiterroriste a réclamé la déclassification de nouveaux documents secret défense, à la suite d’une demande des parties civiles.

Arsène Gbaguidi, consultant international est désormais Docteur en Sciences politiques. Il a soutenu sa thèse de doctorat le mardi 3 février 2026, devant un jury présidé par le Professeur Ibrahim Salami.

« La gouvernance interne des partis politiques et consolidation de la démocratie en Afrique : Cas de la République du Benin et de la République centrafricaine », c'est le thème développé par Arsène Gbaguidi, pour sa thèse de doctorat. Il a présenté les résultats de ses recherches lors d'une soutenance mardi 3 février 2026.
Face au jury, l'impétrant expose que la pratique de la démocratie en Afrique a conduit à la restauration du multipartisme intégral dans le processus démocratique. Ce multipartisme renouvelé d'après ses analyses, a consacré la fin du parti unique et du parti d'État, en érigeant les partis politiques au rang d'acteurs principaux de la démocratie, à l'aune des enjeux du processus démocratique retrouvé au lendemain des années 1990. Malgré cela, les partis politiques ne sont pas toujours à la hauteur des attentes.
Sur les cas du Benin et de la Centrafrique, objets de ses recherches, Arsène Gbaguidi a démontré que les partis politiques sont confrontés à plusieurs défis internes dont la confluence ne cesse de se révéler négativement sur la gouvernance politique. L'analyse des partis politiques dans ces deux États laisse apparaitre la nécessité d'une bonne gouvernance à l'intérieur des partis comme condition sine qua non de la gouvernance démocratique en général. Il soutient que le recours à la bonne gouvernance au sein des partis politiques augure également d'une bonne gouvernance politique au sein des États.

Face à ces constats, le nouveau Docteur propose qu'il faille d'une part, « humaniser la politique pour lui donner un sens ». Chose possible grâce au Droit devenu incontournable dans la construction de la démocratie en Afrique, et dont les partis politiques en sont le vecteur principal. Pour lui, c'est cette évidence qui relie la sécurité juridique et la sécurité politique. « La construction de la démocratie et de l'État de droit suppose que le système juridique impacte le système de gouvernance des partis politiques à travers des valeurs éthiques et morales, afin d'édifier une société politique démocratique et de droit de façon convenable en Afrique », a-t-il clarifié.
Arsène Gbaguidi fait remarquer d'autre part que si la proclamation des principes démocratiques ne pose pas de problème en Afrique subsaharienne, celle-ci a certainement un problème de pratique politique saine et de gouvernance démocratique. En se fondant sur le Bénin et la Centrafrique, il fait observer qu'il y a des « changements constants » dans les alliances entre les dirigeants et les partis, témoignant d'une politique déracinée et désarticulée par rapport aux principes ou à la fidélité aux valeurs de démocratie et de l'État de droit. Les crises de représentation et de légitimité en sont les conséquences immédiates à cause du factionnalisme des partis politiques dits démocratiques souvent aux prises dans l'arène politique africaine depuis les indépendances, a-t-il fait savoir avant d'évoquer la nécessité de démocratiser à nouveau les pratiques politiques au sein des partis politiques démocratiques en vue de perfectionner la gouvernance démocratique en Afrique.
Le jury convaincu des résultats de ses recherches lui décerne la mention Très honorable.
Le nouveau Docteur a assumé pendant près de 30 ans dans les régions d'Afrique de l'Ouest et du Centre, les rôles de leadership dans la formulation de conseils stratégiques à l'intention des hauts responsables de l'ONU et des chefs des opérations de maintien de la paix de l'ONU en ce qui concerne la mise en œuvre globale des résolutions successives du Conseil de sécurité de l'ONU. Il a dirigé avec succès des équipes dans divers domaines en lien avec la paix et la sécurité de l'ONU, y compris les processus de paix et politiques, les élections nationales et la gouvernance démocratique.

F. A. A.

Workers report debt-linked recruitment. Companies, financiers, and Taiwan’s government face a test of remedy.

Written by Sebastian Clapp

Facts and figures

The EU’s defence industry is at a pivotal moment, shaped by Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the United States’ shifting priorities, and a renewed drive for strategic autonomy. After years of underinvestment and persistent fragmentation, the EU is now seeking to rebuild military capability and strengthen its defence industrial base. The European defence industry comprises a number of large prime contractors, mid-caps and a large number of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). According to Aerospace, Security and Defence Industries Association of Europe (ASD) data, and the author’s calculations for the EU-27, the EU-based defence industry’s turnover is estimated at around €148 billion in 2024, an increase of more than 60 % since 2021 in nominal terms. Exports amounted to roughly €48 billion in 2024 and direct employment in the EU defence industry amounted to around 500 000 people.

Table 1 – Top EU defence companies by revenue

CompanyCountryRevenue*Global rankingThalesFrance15 900#10LeonardoItaly13 822#13AirbusEuropean12 705#14RheinmetallGerman8 245#18SaabSweden5 542#26MBDAEuropean5 305#27SafranFrance5 198#29Naval GroupFrance4 716#33

Source: DefenseNews, 2024. *Revenue from defence in US$ million (2024).

Table 2 – EU defence industry revenue, 2021-2024

Source: ASD data, 2025 and author’s calculations.

The EU’s defence industry remains largely concentrated in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and Sweden. However, a report shows that prime producers of the 46 most critical defence items are located across 23 Member States. Thales of France ranked as the largest defence company in the EU by defence revenue in 2024, followed by Italy’s Leonardo. That year, 20 companies headquartered in the EU featured among the world’s top 100 defence firms, including five based in France and four in Germany, together generating defence revenues of approximately US$112 billion, or about €104 billion. By contrast, 48 of the top 100 defence companies were based in the United States, accounting for roughly US$334 billion in defence revenue. Lockheed Martin alone, the leading global defence firm, reported defence revenues of US$68.39 billion. Five of the top 100 were based in China, together accounting for US$355 billion in revenue. The ownership structure of Europe’s leading defence firms underscores the strategic character of the sector.
In many instances, national authorities maintain blocking or controlling shares, which helps safeguard alignment with national priorities and allows for direct public oversight. Across continental Europe, ownership is commonly concentrated either within the state or among family-controlled enterprises. Prominent examples include Dassault (almost 70 % of shares held by the Dassault family’s Groupe Industriel Marcel Dassault), Naval Group (over 60 % of shares are held by the French state), Fincantieri (70 % of shares held by the state-owned Italian sovereign wealth fund, CDP Equity S.p.A.), and Liebherr Group (entirely owned by the Liebherr family). State participation can narrow the scope for cross-border cooperation and industrial consolidation. While mergers between defence firms may deliver economic benefits through economies of scale, they are often treated as strategically sensitive due to their implications for national security and sovereignty. Family-owned firms similarly pursue nationally anchored corporate strategies, reducing their openness to deeper EU-level integration. Golden power rules and the veto capacity of dominant family shareholders further reinforce this structural rigidity. Researchers found that the combined effect is a European defence industrial base that remains fragmented and less competitive than more consolidated markets.

What does the European defence industry produce?

The European defence industry produces a broad range of military equipment and technologies and therefore provides an extensive industrial offering. Its production spans: military aeronautics, including combat, transport and mission aircraft, and helicopters; land capabilities, such as main battle tanks, armoured vehicles across multiple classes, logistics and tactical transport assets, artillery and ammunition of different calibres, alongside individual combat equipment; naval platforms from submarines to surface combatants; space-related defence capabilities; missile systems at both tactical and strategic levels; and defence-specific electronics, information and communication technologies, cyber capabilities and autonomous systems – notably drones, which have experienced a particular boom in production. Despite this breadth, the EU industry does not currently provide domestic solutions in several critical segments, including medium altitude long-endurance unmanned aerial vehicles, tactical ballistic missiles and long-range artillery rockets. These gaps reflect long-term underinvestment and sustained dependence on the United States security guarantee.

Following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the rapid availability of military equipment became a key priority for EU governments and armed forces. Firms based outside Europe – benefiting either from larger domestic markets as in the United States or from higher baseline levels of defence readiness as in South Korea – were better positioned to maintain higher production capacity and to deliver or pledge substantial quantities of equipment at speed. By contrast, many European manufacturers were limited by long periods of industrial contraction and underinvestment. This context has evolved markedly since the onset of Russia’s full-scale invasion. EU ammunition production capacity, for example, rose from around 300 000 rounds per year in 2022 to an estimated 2 million by the end of 2025, reflecting a pace of industrial expansion that, according to the Financial Times, exceeds peacetime growth rates by a factor of three.

EU and Member States’ support for the defence industry

EU Member States’ defence expenditure has risen sharply since 2021, reflecting a sustained shift towards higher investment in defence. Defence spending reached an estimated €381 billion in 2025, representing a rise of almost 63 % compared to 2020. Expenditure grew from 1.6 % of GDP in 2023 to 1.9 % in 2024 and is expected to reach approximately 2.1 % in 2025. Growth has been driven primarily by investment, which approached €130 billion in 2025. Investment accounted for 31 % of total defence expenditure in 2024, with equipment procurement dominating and exceeding €88 billion. Defence research and development spending also expanded significantly, reaching €13 billion in 2024 and a projected €17 billion in 2025. The EU has introduced several measures to complement and amplify national efforts. These include financial support instruments such as the SAFE loan facility, budgetary flexibility via the national escape clause, and cooperation through the European Peace Facility. In parallel, EU budget instruments such as the European Defence Fund, military mobility funding, the Act in Support of Ammunition Production (ASAP), the European Defence Industry Reinforcement through Common Procurement Act (EDIRPA) and the European defence industry programme (EDIP) aim to reduce fragmentation and strengthen the competitiveness of Europe’s defence industrial base.

European Parliament position

Parliament has consistently called for an increase in defence spending and for boosting the EU defence industry. Members welcome rising national defence spending but urge deeper European cooperation to prevent market fragmentation and call for expanded industrial output and greater interoperability.

Read this ‘at a glance’ note on ‘European defence industry‘ in the Think Tank pages of the European Parliament.

Innaa lillahi wa innaa ilayhi raai'uun
« Certes, nous appartenons à Allah et c'est à lui que nous retournons » (sourate Al Baqara, verset 156)
Sa majesté le Naaba Guigma de Zogoré

Le ting Naaba de Zogoré
Les doyens des quartiers Nakombgo, Balongo, Yi-taorin, Yi-maassoum, dapoya de zogoré
la grande famille OUEDRAOGO à Zogoré, Ouagadougou, Ouahigouya, Bobo-Dioulasso, France, Italie, Côte d'Ivoire

les familles OUEDRAOGO et alliées à Nango, Songondin, Rega, Boh, Touri, Ninga, et de toute la commune de Zogoré
les familles Sawadogo, Tinto et alliées à Boh, Moussa-Yiri et à Ouagadougou

les familles alliées OUEDRAOGO, Touré, Sawadogo et Traoré à Oula, Ouahigouya , Ouagadougou
les frères, les veuves, les enfants, les petits enfants, les belles filles, les beaux fils

très touchés par vos marques de soutien, de compassion, de sympathie, de solidarité, lors de l'hospitalisation et du rappel à Dieu, de leur fils, frère, père, époux, grand père, oncle, beau-père, le 03 février 2026 et de son inhumation le 5 février 2026 dans son village natal Zogoré, de

OUEDRAOGO Mogoyalma dans sa 76 ème année.
Précédemment informaticien à la retraite,
Ancien conseiller municipal de la commune de Zogoré
Fondateur du collège privé Naaba Tiissé de Zogoré
Président fondateur de l'Association Sahel Jeunesse.

vous réitèrent leur profonde gratitude et vous invitent à vous joindre à la famille dans la prière et le recueillement afin d'implorer le pardon de Dieu pour le repos de son âme, par un Doua, le 15 février 2026 à partir de 8h au domicile du défunt sis à tampouy.

Ils expriment leur profonde reconnaissance et leurs remerciements :
Au Président de la délégation Spéciale de Zogoré
Aux FDS et aux VDP de Zogoré
Aux communautés coutumières et religieuses de Zogoré
Aux ressortissants de Zogoré vivants à Ouagadougou
Aux amis et alliés, aux voisins de Ouagadougou

A toute la population de Zogoré
Qu'allah soub anna wa ta allah vous rendre au centuple vos bienfaits et accueille l'âme du defunt dans son royaume firdaws.

By CIVICUS
Feb 9 2026 (IPS)

 
CIVICUS discusses the genocide case against Myanmar at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) with Mohammed Nowkhim of the Arakan Rohingya Society for Peace & Human Rights (ARSPHR), a civil society organisation led by Rohingya people born out of refugee camps in Bangladesh to document atrocities, preserve survivor testimony and advocate for accountability and justice.

Mohammed Nowkhim

On 12 January, the ICJ began hearings in the genocide case brought by The Gambia against Myanmar over the military’s treatment of the Rohingya Muslim minority. The Gambia, representing the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation’s 57 members, accuses Myanmar of breaching the Genocide Convention. The Gambia’s justice minister presented evidence of mass killings, sexual violence and village destruction during a government crackdown in 2017 that forced over 700,000 Rohingya people to flee to Bangladesh. Rohingya survivors testified in closed sessions. Myanmar denies genocidal intent, characterising its actions as counterterrorism. A final judgment is expected before the end of the year.

What atrocities were committed against Rohingya people and what is being examined in court?

During what were called ‘clearance operations’ in 2017, Myanmar security forces burned entire villages, raped women, killed children and threw them into fires and wells. According to documented reports, over 10,000 people were killed and around 700,000, including me, were forced to flee Myanmar. These were not random acts of violence; they were systematic and targeted attacks aimed at erasing our community.

In 2019, The Gambia, supported by 11 other states, filed a case against Myanmar at the ICJ, accusing it of genocide. Judges are now examining evidence of mass killings, sexual violence, village destruction and forced displacement. They are also reviewing official policies and actions that show intent to destroy Rohingya people as a group, including patterns of violence, coordination by state forces and the systematic denial of basic rights.

This case shows that genocide claims can be examined through law rather than dismissed for political convenience. But for the Rohingya, this is not just a legal process. It represents acknowledgment and a source of hope for present and future generations. After decades of denial and silence, our suffering is being heard at the world’s highest court and recognised in a legal space where truth matters. The hearings can’t erase our wounds, but they can offer some solace and a path towards justice.

What evidence supports the case against Myanmar?

The case was built on years of evidence-gathering. The Gambia relied on extensive material from the Independent Investigative Mechanism for Myanmar and United Nations (UN) fact-finding missions, as well as documentation collected over many years by human rights organisations, including Fortify Rights, Human Rights Watch and Rohingya-led groups.

Civil society played a key role when states failed to act. Even when the world looked away, organisations continued to document the truth and refused to let these crimes be erased or rewritten. Long before any court agreed to listen, groups including the ARSPHR were collecting survivor testimonies, documenting violations and carefully preserving evidence, knowing it might one day be used in court. Without that work, much of what happened would have been lost and perpetrators couldn’t have been challenged.

In a way, civil society became the memory of the Rohingya people. Today, this evidence forms part of the case before the ICJ.

Why is accountability so difficult?

Politics often protects perpetrators. Those with power choose stability over justice and shield those responsible for crimes. Myanmar’s authorities continue to deny wrongdoing and refuse to cooperate, which delays justice.

International law also has its limits. Justice moves slowly because ICJ rulings do not automatically lead to consequences. International courts can establish the truth, but they can’t force states to act. Enforcement depends on political will, often through the UN Security Council, where countries such as China and Russia can block action, even when crimes are clear and well documented.

What must happen to ensure justice?

There must be real action. Perpetrators must be held accountable, Rohingya citizenship must be restored and discriminatory laws that enabled genocide must be removed. Any return of refugees must be voluntary, safe and dignified. It can’t happen without international monitoring and guarantees of protection. People can’t be sent back to the same conditions that forced them to flee.

Ultimately, justice is not only about the past, but also about ensuring that future generations of Rohingya can live with rights, safety and dignity. This case is only the beginning. What happens after the judgment will decide whether justice is real or only symbolic.

CIVICUS interviews a wide range of civil society activists, experts and leaders to gather diverse perspectives on civil society action and current issues for publication on its CIVICUS Lens platform. The views expressed in interviews are the interviewees’ and do not necessarily reflect those of CIVICUS. Publication does not imply endorsement of interviewees or the organisations they represent.

GET IN TOUCH
Website
Facebook
Instagram
LinkedIn
Threads
Twitter
Mohammed Nowkhim/Facebook
Mohammed Nowkhim/LinkedIn

SEE ALSO
Myanmar’s junta tightens its grip CIVICUS Lens 12.Dec.2025
International Court of Justice offers hope of rules-based order CIVICUS Lens 19.May.2025
Myanmar at a crossroads CIVICUS Lens 28.Oct.2024

 

Follow @IPSNewsUNBureau
!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],p=/^http:/.test(d.location)?'http':'https';if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src=p+'://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js';fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document, 'script', 'twitter-wjs');  

Certains drones pollinisateurs, plus légers qu'un trombone, pourraient aider à soutenir les ruches.

The post Les robots pollinisateurs à la rescousse des abeilles en déclin en Europe appeared first on Euractiv FR.

La Lettonie a relevé l'âge légal pour acheter des produits contenant de la nicotine l'année dernière, suivie par l'Irlande et la Finlande.

The post Les Pays-Bas vont relever l’âge légal de la consommation de la nicotine à 21 ans  appeared first on Euractiv FR.

Les grandes familles DAYAMBA, KOUDOUGOU et NARE à Ouagadougou, Linoghin et Koupèla et au Benin.
Les familles alliées TIENDREBEOGO, MABONE, OUOBA, SOMDA, DONDASSE, YAMEOGO, OUENIOUNGA et KOFFI à Ouagadougou, Koupèla, en Côte d'Ivoire.

Les enfants du défunt : Sainte-Anne, Louis, Michel, Roger, Florence, Florentine, Léonard, Léopold, Valentin, Mathieu, Mathias et Sylvain, résidant à Ouagadougou, Abidjan et New York ;
Ont la profonde douleur de vous faire part du décès de leur fils, frère, époux, père et grand-père, DAYAMBA Tenbwaogo Augustin, survenu le dimanche 8 février 2026 à 17 h 30, au Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Bogodogo.

Le programme des obsèques se déroulera comme suit :

Lundi 9 février 2026 à 20 h
• Veillée de prières au domicile mortuaire situé à Nioko I, derrière l'église protestante, sur la route de Saaba.
Mardi 10 février 2026

• 7 h 30 : Levée du corps à la morgue du CHU Bogodogo, suivie du transfert au domicile mortuaire à Nioko I.
• 10 h : Absoute à la chapelle Saint-Pierre de Nioko I, suivie de l'inhumation au cimetière de Bargo.
« Que l'âme de papa Tenbwaoga Augustin DAYAMBA repose en paix »

Union de prières.