Le Gouvernement a réduit de 60% le tarif subventionné de l'Imagerie par résonance magnétique (IRM) en avril 2024, le faisant passer de 100 000 à 40 000 francs CFA. Cette baisse vise à rendre cet examen spécialisé plus accessible aux patients, dont le coût pouvait constituer un frein à la prise en charge.
Le ministère de la Santé enregistre déjà 2 084 IRM réalisées au premier semestre 2026, 3 916 en 2025 et 295 IRM en 2024.
Derrière ces milliers d'examens, ce sont surtout des patients qui ont pu mieux comprendre leur maladie, confirmer un diagnostic et dans certains cas, engager plus rapidement le traitement adapté.
Lefaso.net
Source : Ministère de la Santé
Chaque mardi, Pascal Boniface reçoit un membre de l’équipe de recherche de l’IRIS pour décrypter un fait d’actualité internationale. Aujourd’hui, échange avec Jean de Gliniasty, directeur de recherche à l’IRIS et ancien ambassadeur de France en Russie, autour de la visite de Steve Witkoff et Jared Kushner à Moscou puis à Kiev. Malgré des pourparlers jugés « efficaces » par les deux émissaires américains, aucune avancée concrète n’a permis d’aboutir à un accord.
L’article Guerre en Ukraine : mission impossible pour Kushner et Witkoff ? | Les mardis de l’IRIS est apparu en premier sur IRIS.
Countries now act in an international cooperation architecture whose rules are disputed from several directions at once. One of those directions is the hegemon itself, the US. The paper argues that the Trump administration’s disruption matters because it moves the largest actor from affirming to contesting across several arenas at once. That reshuffles the calculus for every country. This paper asks how countries can exercise agency when the international order itself is fragmenting. The paper surveys the bewildering array of concepts on state agency and proposes a schema built on two continua. The first is the medium or type of agency, meaning material/institutional versus ideational/discursive. The second is orientation to the prevailing order in a specific arena (not in general) as affirming versus contesting. Countries are not fixed in one position. Whether the same state contests the rules depends on its interests in a particular arena. Each potential position is available only to a country that can pay the arena’s entry fee. The entry fee is the resources, broadly defined, a position demands before a country can take it up. The paper sets out the strategic positions available in a fragmenting system. It names a further position, norm imperialism, where material instruments are turned against an ideational object. The implications for different types of country are discussed.
Countries now act in an international cooperation architecture whose rules are disputed from several directions at once. One of those directions is the hegemon itself, the US. The paper argues that the Trump administration’s disruption matters because it moves the largest actor from affirming to contesting across several arenas at once. That reshuffles the calculus for every country. This paper asks how countries can exercise agency when the international order itself is fragmenting. The paper surveys the bewildering array of concepts on state agency and proposes a schema built on two continua. The first is the medium or type of agency, meaning material/institutional versus ideational/discursive. The second is orientation to the prevailing order in a specific arena (not in general) as affirming versus contesting. Countries are not fixed in one position. Whether the same state contests the rules depends on its interests in a particular arena. Each potential position is available only to a country that can pay the arena’s entry fee. The entry fee is the resources, broadly defined, a position demands before a country can take it up. The paper sets out the strategic positions available in a fragmenting system. It names a further position, norm imperialism, where material instruments are turned against an ideational object. The implications for different types of country are discussed.