European Union

Coreper agrees on transitional measures to address market concerns about type-approval of vehicles ahead of Brexit.

Brexiters often claim that in Britain’s first referendum of 1975, voters were misled into believing that the Common Market – now called the European Union – was just about ‘free trade’. But that’s not correct. (Article continues after the 5-minute video.)

It was clear even before we joined the European Economic Community (as it was called then) that it was much more than just a free trading arrangement.

When we first applied to join in 1961, the then Prime Minister, Harold Macmillan, told the nation:

“One thing is certain. As a member of the Community, Britain would have a strong voice in deciding the nature and the timing of political unity. 

“By remaining outside, we could be faced with a political solution in Europe which ran counter but which we could do nothing to influence.”

That’s hardly stating that the European Community was only about ‘free trade’.

When eventually we joined the Community in 1973, Prime Minister Edward Heath wrote for the Illustrated London News:

“The community which we are joining is far more than a common market. It is a community in the true sense of that term.

“It is concerned not only with the establishment of free trade, economic and monetary union and other major economic issues, important though these are — but also as the Paris Summit Meeting has demonstrated, with social issues which affect us all — environmental questions, working conditions in industry, consumer protection, aid to development areas and vocational training.”

Again, that’s hardly stating that the Community was only about free trade.

In 1975, two years after we joined, the new Labour government held a referendum on whether Britain wanted to remain in the European Community – the exact same referendum as we had in 2016.

The government’s pamphlet sent to every UK household for the referendum stated that the first aims of the Common Market were to ‘bring together the peoples of Europe’, to ‘raise living standards’ and ‘to maintain peace’.

The pamphlet made clear that as a member, Britain has a ‘say in the future economic and political development of the Common Market.’ If we left the Common Market, ‘Britain would no longer have any say’.

It could not have missed anyone’s attention at the time that the European Community was about much more than just free trade.

Even the Eurosceptics of the time claimed that membership of the Common Market went beyond ‘free trade’.

Their ‘NO’ campaign referendum literature, also distributed to every household, warned what they considered were the dangers of membership:

• To end a thousand years of British freedom and independent nationhood is an unheard of constitutional change.
• Do you want us to be a self-governing nation, or to be a province of Europe?
• Do we want self-government as a great independent nation, or do we want to be governed as a province of the EEC by Commissioners and a Council of Ministers, predominantly foreign, in Brussels?
• Do we want to lose the whole of our individual influence as a nation, which is still great, in order to enhance the status of Europe, which would then function largely outside our control?

Although in over 40 years of membership the fears and warnings of the 1975 ‘NO’ campaign have not materialised, their arguments haven’t changed. In fact, the 2016 referendum has simply regurgitated the same old arguments that took place in the first referendum.

There is little difference between the European Economic Community of 1975 and the European Union of today. They share the same foundational principles and aspirations.

Of course, in over 60 years since its foundation, the European Community has grown phenomenally, with more countries wanting to join. But that just demonstrates the success of the EU project.

The Conservative government under David Cameron could have saved a fortune by simply re-printing the 1975 referendum pamphlet and distributing it for the 2016 referendum.

Almost all the points and arguments remain the same. Nothing much has changed. Read the Labour government’s 1975 pamphlet and judge for yourself.

 

• Follow my journalism page on Facebook: Jon Danzig writes
• Follow my Stop Brexit campaign on Facebook: Reasons2Remain

________________________________________________________

• Join and share the discussion about this article on Facebook:

(function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = 'https://connect.facebook.net/en_GB/sdk.js#xfbml=1&version=v3.2'; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));

Britain wasn't misled when we joined

→ Brexit Myth Breaker about 1975 (video: 5 mins) – please shareIT WAS NEVER JUST ‘FREE TRADE’: POSTER, VIDEO & ARTICLEBrexiters often claim that in Britain’s first referendum of 1975 voters were only told that the Common Market (now called the European Union) was just ‘free trade’. But that’s not correct. It was clear even before we joined the European Economic Community (as it was called then) that it was much more than just a free trading arrangement. One year before we joined, Prime Minister Edward Heath wrote for the Illustrated London News:“The community which we are joining is far more than a common market. It is a community in the true sense of that term. “It is concerned not only with the establishment of free trade, economic and monetary union and other major economic issues, important though these are — but also as the Paris Summit Meeting has demonstrated, with social issues which affect us all — environmental questions, working conditions in industry, consumer protection, aid to development areas and vocational training.”In 1975, two years after we joined, the new Labour government held a referendum on whether Britain wanted to remain in the European Community – the exact same referendum as we had in 2016.The government’s pamphlet sent to every UK household for the referendum stated that the first aims of the Common Market were to ‘bring together the peoples of Europe’, to ‘raise living standards’ and ‘to maintain peace’. The pamphlet made clear that as a member, Britain has a 'say in the future economic and political development of the Common Market.’ If we left the Common Market, 'Britain would no longer have any say'.It could not have missed anyone’s attention at the time that the European Community was about much more than just free trade. Even the Eurosceptics of the time claimed that membership of the Common Market went beyond ‘free trade’. Their ‘NO’ campaign referendum literature, also distributed to every household, warned what they considered were the dangers of membership: To end a thousand years of British freedom and independent nationhood is an unheard of constitutional change. Do you want us to be a self-governing nation, or to be a province of Europe? Do we want self-government as a great independent nation, or do we want to be governed as a province of the EEC by Commissioners and a Council of Ministers, predominantly foreign, in Brussels? Do we want to lose the whole of our individual influence as a nation, which is still great, in order to enhance the status of Europe, which would then function largely outside our control?Although in over 40 years of membership the fears and warnings of the 1975 ‘NO’ campaign have not materialised, their arguments haven’t changed. In fact, the 2016 referendum has simply regurgitated the same old arguments that took place in the first referendum.There is little difference between the European Economic Community of 1975 and the European Union of today. They share the same foundational principles and aspirations. Of course, in over 60 years since its foundation, the European Community has grown phenomenally, with more countries wanting to join. But that just demonstrates the success of the EU project. The Conservative government under David Cameron could have saved a fortune by simply re-printing the 1975 referendum pamphlet and distributing it for the 2016 referendum. Almost all the points and arguments remain the same. Nothing much has changed. Read the Labour government’s 1975 pamphlet and judge for yourself: www.1975pamphlet.reasons2remain.eu • Words and video production by Jon Danzig • Please re-Tweet and follow Reasons2Remain on Twitter:twitter.com/Reasons2Remain/status/1059017651605909504 Before commenting on the Reasons2Remain campaign page, please read our new Rules of Engagement: Rules.Reasons2Remain.com********************************************► Watch Jon Danzig's 50-minute video: 'Can Britain Stop Brexit?' Go to CanBritainStopBrexit.com********************************************• To follow and support Reasons2Remain just ‘like’ the page, and please invite all your friends to like the page. ********************************************• Please recommend Reasons2Remain in the reviews section. Here's the link: facebook.com/Reasons2Remain/reviews/********************************************• Follow Reasons2Remain on Twitter: twitter.com/reasons2remain and Instagram: instagram.com/reasons2remain/********************************************• Explore our unique Reasons2Remain gallery of over 1,000 graphics and articles: reasons2remain.co.uk********************************************• Reasons2Remain is an entirely unfunded community campaign, unaffiliated with any other group or political party, and is run entirely by volunteers. If you'd like to help, please send us a private message.********************************************• © Reasons2Remain 2018. All our articles and graphics are the copyright of Reasons2Remain. We only allow sharing using the Facebook share button. Any other use requires our advance permission in writing.#STOPBREXIT #EXITBREXIT #PEOPLESVOTE #FINALSAY

Posted by Reasons2Remain on Sunday, 4 November 2018

The post Britain wasn’t misled in 1975 appeared first on Ideas on Europe.

Shortly before the midterm elections, US President Donald Trump has announced that he will place up to 15,000 soldiers on the country's southern border in a bid to deter thousands of migrants who are heading towards the US via Mexico. Sealing off the country will not make it more secure, say some observers. Others counter that Trump is right to defend the borders.

Vienna has refused to sign the UN migration pact that its own diplomats helped negotiate. The US, Hungary and Australia had already announced their rejection of the pact. Politicians fear that other European countries may follow suit. The accord, which is not legally binding, is to be presented for approval in December. Critics frown on Vienna's decision.

In response to Ukrainian sanctions, Moscow has published a list of 322 individuals and 68 businesses that have allegedly damaged the interests of Russia and its citizens. In addition to ministers, legislators and business leaders, the list includes the son of Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko. Media in both countries discuss whether the sanctions are justified.

On the first of November, Finland always publishes tax data from the previous year. Nearly all media outlets list the income of prominent individuals. One can search online for the tax information of those who have earned more than 100,000 euros. And at the tax office information about people who've earned less than that can be requested. Is Finland doing the right thing?

After Merkel's announcement that she will not stand for election as leader of the CDU at the next party conference, Europe's leading politicians have expressed their respect for her decision and in particular her commitment to Europe. Europe's commentators are already looking ahead and discussing what qualities her successor will need, especially as regards their role in European policy.