Feed aggregator

Parliament and Council negotiators agreed on new measures to stop abusive practices, curb cruel business practices, and protect the health of cats and dogs.
Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development

Source : © European Union, 2025 - EP

Parliament and Council negotiators agreed on new measures to stop abusive practices, curb cruel business practices, and protect the health of cats and dogs.
Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development

Source : © European Union, 2025 - EP

By James Alix Michel
VICTORIA, Seychelles, Nov 25 2025 (IPS)

When the world gathered in Glasgow for COP26, the mantra was “building back better.” Two years later, in Sharm El Sheikh, COP27 promised “implementation.” This year, in Belém, Brazil, COP30 arrived with a heavier burden: to finally bridge the chasm between lofty rhetoric and the urgent, measurable steps needed to keep 1.5 °C alive.

James Alix Michel

What Was Expected of COP30 was modest yet critical. After the disappointments of Copenhagen (2009) and the optimism sparked by Paris (2015), developing nations, small island states, Indigenous groups and a swelling youth movement demanded three things:

• 1. Binding phase-out timelines for coal, oil and gas.

 

• 2. A fully funded Loss and Damage Facility to compensate vulnerable countries already suffering climate impacts.

 

3. Scaled-up adaptation finance—tripling the $120 billion a year pledge and ensuring it reaches the frontline communities that need it most.

However, the negotiations evolved into a tug-of-war between ambition and inertia. Wealthier nations, still reeling from economic shocks, offered incremental increases in adaptation funding and a new Tropical Forests Forever Facility (TFFF) worth $125 billion, with 20 percent earmarked for Indigenous stewardship. The Global Implementation Accelerator—a two-year bridge to align Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) with 1.5 °C—was launched, alongside a Just Transition Mechanism to share technology and financing.

However, the text on fossil fuel phase-out remained voluntary; the Loss and Damage Fund was referenced but not capitalized; and the $120 billion adaptation pledge fell short of the $310 billion annual need.

But there were Voices That Could Not Be Ignored.

Developing Nations (the G77+China) reminded the plenary that climate justice is not a charity—it is a legal obligation under the UNFCCC. They demanded that historic emitters honor their “common but differentiated responsibilities.”

Island States (AOSIS) warned that sea level rise is no longer a future scenario; it is eroding coastlines and displacing entire cultures. Their plea: “1.5 °C is our survival, not a bargaining chip.”

Indigenous Peoples highlighted the destruction of Amazon and Boreal forests, urging that 30 percent of all climate finance flow directly to communities that protect 80 percent of biodiversity.

Youth — The Gen Z generation—marched outside the venue, chanting, “We will not be diluted,” demanding binding commitments and accountability mechanisms.

The Legacy of Copenhagen, Paris, and the Empty COPs

I attended COP15 in Copenhagen (2009), where the “Danish draft” was rejected, and the summit collapsed amid accusations of exclusion. The disappointment lingered until Paris (2015), where the 1.5 °C aspiration was enshrined, sparking hope that multilateralism could still work. Since then, COPs have been a carousel of promises: the Green Climate Fund fell $20 billion short; the 2022 Glasgow Climate Pact promised “phasing out coal” but left loopholes. Each iteration has chipped away at trust.

COP30 was billed as the moment to reverse that trend.

And the result? Partial progress, but far from the transformational shift required.

Did We Achieve What We Hoped For?

In blunt terms: No. The pledges secured are insufficient to limit warming to 1.5 °C, and critical gaps—binding fossil fuel timelines, robust loss and damage funding, and true equity in finance—remain unfilled.

Yet, there are glimmers. The tripling of adaptation finance, the first concrete allocation for Indigenous led forest protection, and the creation of an Implementation Accelerator signal that the architecture for change exists. The challenge now is to fill it with real money and accountability.

Let us look at ‘What Must Happen Next

• 1. Full Capitalisation of Loss and Damage Fund

 

• – G20 nations must commit 0.1 % of GDP and disburse within 12 months.

 

• 2. Binding Fossil Fuel Phase out – Coal, oil and gas with just transition financing for workers.

 

• 3. Scale Adaptation Finance to $310 billion/yr

 

• – Re channel subsidies from fossil fuels to resilience projects.

 

• 4. Direct Funding for Indigenous and Youth Initiatives

 

• – Allocate 30 % of climate finance to community led stewardship.

 

• 5. Strengthen Accountability

 

– Mandate annual NDC updates with independent verification and penalties for noncompliance.

But for all this to become reality, there must be a determined effort to achieve Future Actions.
We have watched promises fade after every COP, yet the physics of climate change remain unforgiving. The urgency is not new; the window to act is shrinking. But hope endures – in the solar panels lighting remote villages, in mangroves being restored to buffer storms, and in the relentless energy of young activists demanding a livable planet.

Humanity has the knowledge, technology, and resources. What we need now is the collective political will to use them. Let COP30 be remembered not as another empty summit, but as the turning point where the world chose survival over complacency.

The future is not written; we write it with every decision we make today.

James Alix Michel, Former President Republic of Seychelles, Member Club de Madrid.

IPS UN Bureau

 

Follow @IPSNewsUNBureau
!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],p=/^http:/.test(d.location)?'http':'https';if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src=p+'://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js';fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document, 'script', 'twitter-wjs');  

On the International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women, Europe should ask whether its institutions are more effective by detaching themselves from the pain they claim to address?

Début novembre, Tonka a basculé dans l'horreur. Mariam, 25 ans, a été enlevée à Echell, à 25 kilomètres de là, puis exécutée publiquement sur la place de l'indépendance.

EEB says the inquiry signals a ‘shrinking civic space’ amid fears the process is politically driven

The proposed rules to address the menace of deepfakes are technically unfeasible, socially naïve, and legally clumsy.

A panic-driven U-turn exposed deep divisions in the Parliament over the deal

This time Russian drones weren't to blame

The change is set to pass via fast-track procedure, prompting criticism from legal actors, anti-corruption NGOs and even the country's prosecutor general

France alone makes up over half of the protocol’s funding gap among 68 ratifying countries

If Tokyo acquires nuclear-powered subs, it would be a significant strategic shift for the only nation to have suffered atomic bombings. 

Die Afrikanische Union und die Europäische Union treffen sich in Luanda zu ihrem 7. gemeinsamen Gipfel. Staats- und Regierungschefs, Wirtschaftsvertreter sowie zivilgesellschaftliche Akteure beider Kontinente sind präsent. Deutschland ist durch den Bundeskanzler vertreten. Im Mittelpunkt der Gipfelgespräche stehen Themen wie wirtschaftliche Kooperation, Handel und kritische Rohstoffe, digitale Innovation, Frieden und Sicherheit sowie Migration und Mobilität und Reformen multilateraler Institutionen. Damit der Gipfel ein Erfolg wird, muss er mehr liefern als nur wohlklingende Erklärungen zum gegenseitigen Nutzen der Partnerschaft. Was es braucht, ist ein Fokus auf konkrete Maßnahmen, die von beiden Seiten gemeinsam entwickelt und umgesetzt werden. Nur so kann die Asymmetrie in den Beziehungen schrittweise überwunden und die Partnerschaft an die Anforderungen einer sich rapide ändernden Welt angepasst werden. 

Die Afrikanische Union und die Europäische Union treffen sich in Luanda zu ihrem 7. gemeinsamen Gipfel. Staats- und Regierungschefs, Wirtschaftsvertreter sowie zivilgesellschaftliche Akteure beider Kontinente sind präsent. Deutschland ist durch den Bundeskanzler vertreten. Im Mittelpunkt der Gipfelgespräche stehen Themen wie wirtschaftliche Kooperation, Handel und kritische Rohstoffe, digitale Innovation, Frieden und Sicherheit sowie Migration und Mobilität und Reformen multilateraler Institutionen. Damit der Gipfel ein Erfolg wird, muss er mehr liefern als nur wohlklingende Erklärungen zum gegenseitigen Nutzen der Partnerschaft. Was es braucht, ist ein Fokus auf konkrete Maßnahmen, die von beiden Seiten gemeinsam entwickelt und umgesetzt werden. Nur so kann die Asymmetrie in den Beziehungen schrittweise überwunden und die Partnerschaft an die Anforderungen einer sich rapide ändernden Welt angepasst werden. 

Die Afrikanische Union und die Europäische Union treffen sich in Luanda zu ihrem 7. gemeinsamen Gipfel. Staats- und Regierungschefs, Wirtschaftsvertreter sowie zivilgesellschaftliche Akteure beider Kontinente sind präsent. Deutschland ist durch den Bundeskanzler vertreten. Im Mittelpunkt der Gipfelgespräche stehen Themen wie wirtschaftliche Kooperation, Handel und kritische Rohstoffe, digitale Innovation, Frieden und Sicherheit sowie Migration und Mobilität und Reformen multilateraler Institutionen. Damit der Gipfel ein Erfolg wird, muss er mehr liefern als nur wohlklingende Erklärungen zum gegenseitigen Nutzen der Partnerschaft. Was es braucht, ist ein Fokus auf konkrete Maßnahmen, die von beiden Seiten gemeinsam entwickelt und umgesetzt werden. Nur so kann die Asymmetrie in den Beziehungen schrittweise überwunden und die Partnerschaft an die Anforderungen einer sich rapide ändernden Welt angepasst werden. 

Perceptions of Washington’s indifference can perpetuate a risky status quo.

In the draft Council text, obtained by Euractiv, countries push the Commission for measures to boost European competitiveness that align with a tech sovereignty agenda

Digital innovation, powered by AI and data, can transform rare disease care across Europe. To achieve this potential, policymakers, industry, and patient communities must collaborate to ensure equitable access, ethical use of data, and shared progress in a connected health ecosystem.

The U.S. should avoid a narrow Christian focus.

Selon les dernières données publiées par ONU Tourisme dans l'édition 2025 des "International Tourism Highlights", 1,465 milliard de touristes ont voyagé à travers le monde en 2024.