En 2023, alors qu’il siégeait sur les bancs de l’opposition, le social-démocrate Robert Fico déposa une plainte contre le gouvernement slovaque afin de contester sa décision de donner treize avions de combat MiG-29 à l’Ukraine… sans attendre la mise en service des 14 F-16 Block 70/72 « Viper » que Bratislava avait commandés auprès de Lockheed Martin...
Cet article La Slovaquie a l’intention de commander davantage de chasseurs-bombardiers F-16 Viper est apparu en premier sur Zone Militaire.
A l’issue d’une marche pacifique organisée ce mardi 17 février, de la Gare centrale à la Primature, dans la commune de la Gombe à Kinshasa, les médecins membres du Syndicat libre des médecins (SYLIMED) ont annoncé le déclenchement d’un mouvement de grève.
Credit: UNICEF/Eyad El Baba
What is international humanitarian law? Families flee their shattered homes in Tal al-Hawa neighbourhood in Gaza city. While aid workers serving conflict-affected civilian populations depend on a set of laws to protect them, some warring parties violate these global agreements, from targeting hospitals and schools to blocking aid workers from reaching civilians with lifesaving goods and services. Source: UN News
By Stuart Casey-Maslen
GENEVA, Feb 17 2026 (IPS)
International humanitarian law is at a breaking point, as rampant impunity for serious violations is enabling even greater abuses against civilians and detainees.
Across today’s wars, violations are no longer concealed or exceptional. They are increasingly open, systematic, and unpunished, with catastrophic consequences for those whom the law is supposed to protect.
New analysis of 23 situations of armed conflict between July 2024 and the end of 2025 reveals a consistent pattern: civilians are being killed, abused and starved at scale, while accountability mechanisms either falter or are actively undermined. Genocidal violence in Gaza, a renewed risk of genocide in Sudan, and mass atrocities elsewhere are not isolated horrors. Taken together, they point to a deeper failure – the collapse of meaningful restraint in the conduct of hostilities.
Conflict-related sexual violence has reached epidemic levels. Rape, sexual slavery, and sexual violence used as punishment or as a tool of territorial control have been documented across multiple conflicts, including in Colombia, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Myanmar, and Sudan. Particularly alarming is the growing number of cases involving attacks children, including victims as young as one.
These are not by-products of war, but violations long prohibited under international humanitarian law, now committed with near-total impunity. This occurs with the complicity of many other States, which have a duty to respect and ensure respect international humanitarian law.
This erosion of civilian protection is not primarily the result of gaps in legal knowledge. The rules exist. The problem is political choice – and a persistent failure to enforce, clarify and update the law where it no longer offers meaningful restraint.
Nowhere is this clearer than in the global arms trade. The United Nations Arms Trade Treaty has been widely ratified, including by major exporters such as China, France, and the United Kingdom. In theory, it requires its member States to deny arms transfers where there is a clear risk that weapons will be used to commit serious violations of international law. In practice, legal risk assessments are all too often overridden by strategic and political considerations.
Continued arms exports to Israel, Russia, and others, despite overwhelming evidence of civilian harm, have had devastating consequences on the ground.
Closing this gap does not require a raft of new rules in the short term. It requires the consistent application of existing ones: enforceable, evidence-based export controls; independent scrutiny of licensing decisions; and real accountability where transfers are authorised despite a clear risk that the law will be breached by the recipient.
Certain categories of weapons are though incompatible with the protection of civilians, but do not necessarily violate the already permissive standards. Repeated firing into populated areas of gravity ordnance from the air and inaccurate long-range artillery from the ground has been a major driver of civilian casualties across multiple conflicts.
There is a fundamental lack of clarity on two key rules: first, how close an attack may be launched to a military target while still complying with the law; and second, how much incidental civilian harm is permissible when targeting a military objective.
On both issues, the law urgently requires clarification. Restricting air-delivered weapons to precision-guided munitions alone would already make a measurable difference to civilian survival. Achieving this, however, requires States to clarify and update the rules of international humanitarian law that were drafted in the 1970s.
In State-on-State conflicts such as in Kherson province in Ukraine, drones have been used by Russian forces – and others – to target civilians, sometimes with real-time video footage disseminated online by the perpetrators.
At the same time, armed drones are no longer the preserve of States. Their use by non-State armed groups is increasing rapidly, including by JNIM in the Sahel, Islamic State in Somalia, and the Arakan Army in Myanmar. There is an urgent need for stronger mechanisms to attribute, investigate, and prosecute unlawful drone and autonomous weapon attacks.
Impunity on this scale is not inevitable. It is the product of sustained political and financial neglect. Institutions designed to promote compliance with international humanitarian law – including domestic courts and international tribunals – are under severe strain, with some facing paralysis or closure due to lack of resources.
Judges at bodies such as the International Criminal Court have even been sanctioned simply for carrying out their mandates. If States are serious about protecting civilians, political and financial support for these institutions must be treated as a core obligation and a policy priority, not an optional gesture.
The current moment represents a critical test for international humanitarian law itself. The international lawyer Hersch Lauterpacht once warned that the law existed at the “vanishing point” of international law. That warning is no longer theoretical.
Whether humanitarian law continues to function as a real constraint on warfare, or recedes into symbolic rhetoric, will depend on the political choices states make now – and on whether civilian protection is treated as a legal duty rather than a discretionary one.
Stuart Casey-Maslen is an international lawyer and lead author of War Watch: International Humanitarian Law in Focus at the Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights
IPS UN Bureau
Follow @IPSNewsUNBureau
L'attaquant international congolais Samuel Essende relance sa carrière en Suisse. Manque de temps de jeu au FC Augsbourg (Bundesliga), il s’est engagé avec le BSC Young Boys ce lundi 16 février 2026, pour un transfert record et un contrat longue durée.
L’officialisation a été faite sur les réseaux sociaux du club bernois, qui mise sur le buteur congolais pour renforcer son secteur offensif.
La Grande Mosquée de Paris a confirmé ce mardi la date de début du Ramadan 1447, fixée au mercredi 18 février 2026. Comme le veut […]
L’article Début du Ramadan 2026 : la Grande Mosquée de Paris fixe la date pour les musulmans de France est apparu en premier sur .
Les drones constituent une véritable révolution aéronautique en ce sens qu’une seule technologie, utilisant une voilure fixe ou tournante, permet tout à la fois des usages récréatifs, industriels ou de services mais aussi pour les administrations publiques, notamment pour la défense et la sécurité. Toutes ces applications ont un dénominateur commun dans la mesure où l’utilisation de ces biens à double usage (civil et militaire) relève d’une activité aérienne à part entière. La réglementation européenne désigne sous l’appellation d’« Unmanned Aircraft Systems » (ou UAS) tout aéronef sans équipage à bord et l’équipement servant à le contrôler à distance. Les normes applicables aux drones sont très nombreuses : dès avant le législateur
européen avec les règlements de 2019, une loi du 24 octobre 2016, ainsi qu’une série d’arrêtés ont défini la notion de télépilote, précisé leurs obligations en matière d’immatriculation, d’enregistrement ou de signalement (électronique, lumineux et sonore) et permis de réprimer les usages illicites ou malveillants qui peuvent en être faits. Les enjeux juridiques des drones dépassent toutefois le seul cadre du droit aérien. Ainsi des règles relatives au respect de la vie privée, au traitement des données à caractère personnel, à la
sûreté, voire au droit international humanitaire s’agissant des drones dans les conflits armés, lorsqu’elles ont vocation à s’appliquer à ce type d’aéronef, prennent une dimension particulière.
L’article Le droit des drones en question est apparu en premier sur IRIS.
L’AS Maniema Union affrontera l’USM Alger en quarts de finale de la Coupe de la Confédération de la CAF 2025-2026. L’affiche est issue du tirage au sort organisé mardi 17 février au siège de la Confédération africaine de football, au Caire. Une première historique pour Maniema Union.
Deuxième du groupe B à l’issue de la phase de poules, le club de Kindu se hisse pour la première fois de son histoire en quarts de finale de la compétition.
Depuis le retrait des dix-huit Bréguet Br 1150 Atlantic, en 2017, l’Aeronautica Militare met en œuvre quatre ATR-72MP ou P-72A, dérivés de l’ATR 72 civil] pour effectuer des missions de patrouille maritime. Équipés du système de mission ATOS [Airborne Tactical Observation and Surveillance], d’un radar Seaspray 7300E, du capteur électro-optique Star Safire 380 HD et...
Cet article L’italien Leonardo a confirmé la vente de quatre avions de patrouille maritime C-27MPA à l’Arabie saoudite est apparu en premier sur Zone Militaire.