Une étudiante de 25 ans a été retrouvée morte jeudi soir devant la Faculté de philosophie de Belgrade. Alors que les circonstances du drame restent à éclaircir, les tabloïds proches du pouvoir ont mis en cause l'université et le mouvement étudiant. Les associations de journalistes dénoncent une instrumentalisation politique d'une tragédie.
- Le fil de l'Info / Courrier des Balkans, Vucic, Serbie, MédiasIn der zentralen Lage im Herzen von Hamburg bietet das Parkhaus Europa Passage Hamburg ideale Voraussetzungen für einen stressfreien Start in Ihren Tag. Mit modernen und geräumigen Parkplätzen sowie einer bequemen Zufahrt über Ballindamm wird Ihr Aufenthalt zum Kinderspiel.
Ihre Sicherheit ist durch eine umfassende Videoüberwachung gewährleistet, und zahlreiche Ladestationen für Elektroautos stehen zur Verfügung. Profitieren Sie von einem direkten Zugang zu vielfältigen Geschäften und Gastronomieangeboten, während unser kundenfreundlicher Service Ihnen stets zur Seite steht.
Das Wichtigste in KürzeDas Parkhaus Europa Passage Hamburg befindet sich in einer äußerst zentralen Lage im Herzen von Hamburg. Dies bedeutet, dass Sie bequem und schnell die wichtigsten Sehenswürdigkeiten der Stadt erreichen können.
Ergänzende Artikel: Europakarte: In geographischer Perfektion
Moderne und geräumige Parkplätze Parkhaus Europa Passage Hamburg: Ihr ParkplatzDas Parkhaus Europa Passage Hamburg bietet Ihnen moderne und geräumige Parkplätze. Diese wurden speziell konzipiert, um Ihr Fahrzeug sicher und komfortabel abzustellen. Mit breiten Stellflächen und einer klaren Beschilderung wird die Parkplatzsuche stressfrei gestaltet.
Ein gut durchdachtes Parkhaus ist der erste Schritt zu einem gelungenen Tag in der Stadt. – Peter Tschentscher, Bürgermeister von Hamburg
Bequeme Zufahrt über BallindammDie bequeme Zufahrt erfolgt über den Ballindamm, was eine stressfreie Anreise ermöglicht. Die zentrale Lage des Parkhauses stellt sicher, dass Sie im Herzen von Hamburg schnell und einfach parken können.
Sichere Parkplätze mit VideoüberwachungDie Sicherheit Ihres Fahrzeugs ist uns wichtig. Deshalb sind unsere Parkplätze im Parkhaus Europa Passage Hamburg mit modernster Videoüberwachung ausgestattet. Dies gewährleistet eine erhöhte Sicherheit und beruhigt Ihr Gefühl, während Sie Ihren Aufenthalt in der Stadt genießen.
Ergänzende Artikel: Reiseziele im Oktober in Europa
.table-responsiv {width: 100%;padding: 0px;margin-bottom: 0px;overflow-y: hidden;border: 1px solid #DDD;overflow-x: auto;min-height: 0.01%;} Ausstattungsmerkmal Beschreibung Vorteile Zentrale Lage Im Herzen von Hamburg. Bequem Zugang zu Sehenswürdigkeiten. Geräumige Parkplätze Moderne und breite Stellflächen. Einfaches und stressfreies Parken. Videoüberwachung Modernste Sicherheitstechnologie. Erhöhte Sicherheit für Ihr Fahrzeug. Zahlreiche Ladestationen für Elektroautos Zahlreiche Ladestationen für Elektroautos – Parkhaus Europa Passage Hamburg: Ihr ParkplatzDas Parkhaus Europa Passage Hamburg bietet zahlreiche Ladestationen für Elektroautos. Hier können Sie Ihr Fahrzeug bequem und sicher aufladen, während Sie Ihre Erledigungen in der Stadt machen.
Interessanter Artikel: Kaart Europa: Ihr Überblick
Direkter Zugang zu Geschäften und GastronomieMit dem Parkhaus Europa Passage Hamburg haben Sie direkten Zugang zu einer Vielzahl von Geschäften und können bequem in der angrenzenden Gastronomie Speisen genießen. Ob Shopping, ein schnelles Mittagessen oder ein entspannter Abend im Restaurant – die vielfältigen Angebote sind nur wenige Schritte entfernt.
Flexible Parkmöglichkeiten für LangzeitparkerLangzeitparker sind im Parkhaus Europa Passage Hamburg bestens aufgehoben, da wir verschiedene flexible Parkmöglichkeiten anbieten. Egal, ob Sie mehrere Tage oder Wochen einen Parkplatz benötigen – bei uns finden Sie immer die passende Lösung.
Kundenfreundlicher Service und UnterstützungUnser Parkhaus Europa Passage Hamburg bietet einen kundenfreundlichen Service, der Ihnen bei jeglichen Fragen oder Anliegen zur Seite steht. Bei Bedarf unterstützen wir Sie gerne bei allen Parkanfragen.
FAQ: Antworten auf häufig gestellte Fragen Welche Zahlungsmethoden werden im Parkhaus Europa Passage Hamburg akzeptiert? Wir akzeptieren alle gängigen Zahlungsmethoden, einschließlich Bargeld, Kreditkarten, EC-Karten und kontaktloses Bezahlen mittels NFC-Technologie. Gibt es spezielle Angebote oder Rabatte für Stammkunden? Ja, wir bieten spezielle Tarife und Rabatte für Stammkunden sowie Abonnements für regelmäßige Parker an. Bitte wenden Sie sich an unseren Kundenservice für weitere Informationen. Sind die Parkplätze für Menschen mit Behinderungen zugänglich? Ja, das Parkhaus Europa Passage Hamburg verfügt über speziell gekennzeichnete Behindertenparkplätze, die sich in unmittelbarer Nähe zu den Aufzügen befinden, um den Zugang zu erleichtern. Gibt es ein Höchstmaß an Fahrzeughöhe, die das Parkhaus aufnehmen kann? Ja, die maximale Fahrzeughöhe beträgt 2,10 Meter. Bitte stellen Sie sicher, dass Ihr Fahrzeug diese Höhe nicht überschreitet. Wie sind die Öffnungszeiten des Parkhauses? Das Parkhaus Europa Passage Hamburg ist 24 Stunden am Tag, 7 Tage die Woche geöffnet, damit Sie jederzeit Zugang zu Ihrem Fahrzeug haben. Bietet das Parkhaus eine Fahrzeugreinigung oder andere Dienstleistungen an? Ja, wir bieten eine Fahrzeugreinigung sowie weitere Dienstleistungen wie kleinere Reparaturen und Wartungsarbeiten durch Partnerunternehmen an. Nähere Informationen erhalten Sie an der Parkhausinformation. Welche Sicherheitsmaßnahmen gibt es im Parkhaus abgesehen von der Videoüberwachung? Zusätzlich zur Videoüberwachung ist das Parkhaus gut beleuchtet und es gibt regelmäßige Kontrollgänge durch Sicherheitspersonal, um die Sicherheit der Fahrzeuge und der Nutzer zu gewährleisten.Der Beitrag Parkhaus Europa Passage Hamburg: Ihr Parkplatz erschien zuerst auf Neurope.eu - News aus Europa.
Photo: Green Circuit Board by Miguel Á. Padriñán, available from https://www.pexels.com/photo/green-circuit-board-343457/
Cristina PinnaOver the past decade, research security has moved from a technical concern discussed among specialists to a central issue in European research policy. What began as a debate about protecting sensitive technologies has expanded into a broader question about how knowledge should be governed in a changing geopolitical environment. Today, it shapes funding rules, international cooperation, and the everyday practices of universities across Europe, becoming part of a broader effort to govern knowledge flows amid geopolitical uncertainty and perceived vulnerability. It reflects a wider shift in how the European Union (EU) understands openness, collaboration, and risk.
In my ongoing research on EU research security and international academic cooperation (Pinna, 2024; Cai, Pinna and van der Wende, 2025; Pinna, 2025), I examine how this shift reflects more than a response to specific threats and is linked to the EU’s broader geopolitical repositioning and to the growing recognition that research and innovation are strategic domains. Policy debates increasingly frame scientific cooperation in terms of resilience, technological sovereignty, and economic security (European Commission 2025b) and are linked to the EU’s broader geopolitical repositioning and to the growing recognition that research and innovation are strategic domains.
From openness to managed interdependence
For much of the early 2000s, EU research policy rested on the assumption that international openness was inherently beneficial. The development of the European Research Area (ERA), successive Framework Programmes, and mobility initiatives reflected a paradigm in which universities were encouraged to internationalise, compete globally, and integrate into the knowledge economy. International cooperation was tied to a neoliberal logic of competitiveness and excellence, where openness was seen as necessary for growth and scientific leadership.
Over time, this consensus began to change. Advances in dual-use technologies, the strategic importance of innovation, and geopolitical rivalry led policymakers to reconsider the risks of unrestricted collaboration. Scientific cooperation is now seen not only as a driver of competitiveness, but also as a source of vulnerability. Concerns about knowledge transfer, foreign interference, and asymmetric dependencies have moved to the centre of policy debates, especially in strategic technologies. Where the previous decade emphasised internationalisation as an economic imperative, the current one increasingly frames it through a security logic concerned with exposure, dependence, and risk.
These developments are particularly visible in EU–China academic relations. Earlier narratives emphasised partnership and mutual benefit, whereas recent debates refer to reciprocity, risk awareness, and strategic dependencies (Cai, Pinna, and van der Wende 2025). Cooperation continues, but under more cautious and conditional terms.
Recent EU initiatives reflect this recalibration. The Council Recommendation on Enhancing Research Security defines research security as the need to anticipate and manage risks related to unwanted knowledge transfer, malign influence on research, and violations of academic integrity or EU values (European Commission 2024a). Research security, therefore, goes beyond protecting technologies and includes safeguarding the conditions under which research remains open and trustworthy. The White Paper on dual-use R&D further highlights the overlap between civilian innovation and security concerns (European Commission 2024b). Together, these documents signal a move from unconditional openness to managed internationalisation.
Security embedded in everyday research governance
This transformation has not taken the form of sudden restrictions. Instead, security concerns have been integrated into existing procedures.
Rather than imposing strict prohibitions, the EU mainly relies on regulatory and coordinative tools. Funding rules, due-diligence requirements, export controls, and risk assessments increasingly shape research cooperation. Recent Commission initiatives provide guidance and coordination tools for Member States (European Commission 2025a).
Because education and research remain largely national competencies, the implementation of research security is shaped by the relationship between the EU and its Member States. EU institutions set the direction, but Member States, funding agencies, universities, and researchers implement it. In this sense, research security develops through a multi-level governance system in which responsibilities are distributed rather than centrally imposed (Pinna 2024). Translating research security into practice is uneven across governance levels, with divergent narratives creating uncertainty for implementers and making the process more contested than official policy language suggests (Rüland et al. 2025).
A broader geopolitical context
The growing prominence of research security is closely connected to the EU’s wider geopolitical agenda. Since the late 2010s, EU policy has emphasised resilience, strategic autonomy, and reducing critical dependencies. Research and innovation are no longer seen only as drivers of growth, but as areas linked to security, competitiveness, and systemic vulnerability (European Commission 2025b).
This shift reflects not only the pursuit of power, but also growing concern about vulnerability within open research systems. Policymakers worry that openness may expose critical technologies, create dependencies, or allow foreign influence in sensitive areas. These concerns have led to new policy instruments in “like-minded” countries such as the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and Australia, where governments introduced guidelines to help universities manage geopolitical risks in international collaboration (Shih, Chubb, and Cooney-O’Donoghue 2025). Comparative work also shows that in both Germany and the United States, research security is reshaping scientific cooperation under geopolitical pressure, though through different governance traditions (Rüffin et al. 2025).
The EU response remains distinctive. Rather than relying on direct restrictions, it mainly uses coordination, recommendations, and regulatory frameworks. Cooperation remains central, but with greater attention to exposure, dependence, and strategic capabilities. Research security, therefore, reflects an attempt to govern interdependence rather than abandon openness.
Changing language, changing expectations
This transformation is also visible in policy language. Over the past decade, EU documents have moved from the vocabulary of openness and global exchange to terms such as responsible internationalisation, de-risking, and strategic autonomy. These changes reflect shifting narratives about how openness should be organised.
Earlier frameworks stressed partnership and mobility, whereas recent documents emphasise risk awareness, due diligence, and institutional responsibility. The Council Recommendation on research security places risk assessment and safeguards within normal research governance (European Commission 2024a). Openness is no longer taken for granted but must be actively managed.
This shift is often summarised in the principle that cooperation should be “as open as possible, as closed as necessary.” Initially used in technical contexts, this expression now captures a broader change in how international collaboration is understood. It reflects the attempt to preserve openness while recognising its risks.
This shift in language is particularly visible in EU–China academic relations. Earlier narratives centred on partnership and exchange, while more recent debates increasingly refer to risk management, strategic dependencies, and the protection of sensitive knowledge (Cai, Pinna, and van der Wende 2025; Pinna 2024). These changes reorganise expectations across the research system, redistributing responsibility among universities, funding agencies, and individual researchers.
Concluding reflections
Research security has become a defining feature of EU research policy. What began as concern about sensitive technologies has evolved into a broader effort to reconsider how knowledge circulates in an increasingly contested global environment.
The shift is visible both in policy instruments and in the language of international cooperation. Terms such as responsible internationalisation, strategic autonomy, and de-risking reflect a shift from openness as the default to a more cautious organisation of international cooperation.
For the EU, this reflects an effort to remain open while reducing vulnerabilities. For universities and researchers, collaboration continues but with stronger expectations of responsibility and risk awareness. Understanding this shift is essential for navigating European research governance. Research security is not simply a constraint on cooperation, but an attempt to redefine how international collaboration can continue in a more uncertain and contested world.
Dr. Cristina Pinna is a Marie Skłodowska-Curie Fellow at the Department of International Relations and International Organization, University of Groningen, the Netherlands. Her research examines China’s global engagement, with particular interest in EU–China relations, the geopolitics of infrastructure and science and technology. She previously worked at the United Nations Development Programme in Beijing and has held research and teaching roles in Italy, Netherlands, Canada and China. She has launched a research group (Geo)Politics of the Global Science System – gloknos.
References
Cai, Yuzhuo, Cristina Pinna, and Marijk van der Wende, eds. 2025. Rethinking EU–China higher education cooperation in a complex and changing global environment. Special issue, Journal of Studies in International Education 29(2): 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/10283153251316930
European Commission. 2024a. Council recommendation on enhancing research security. COM(2024) 26 final. Brussels.
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=COM:2024:26:FIN
European Commission. 2024b. White paper on options for enhancing support for research and development involving technologies with dual-use potential. Brussels.
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52024DC0027
European Commission. 2025a. Commission announces new measures to strengthen research security. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, 28 October. Brussels. https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/news/all-research-and-innovation-news/commission-announces-new-measures-strengthen-research-security-2025-10-28_en
European Commission. 2025b. Strategic Autonomy and European Economic and Research Security. https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/strategy/strategy-research-and-innovation/europe-world/international-cooperation/strategic-autonomy-and-european-economic-and-research-security_en
Pinna, Cristina. 2024. Navigating knowledge and research security in EU–China academic relations: The case of Hungary, Italy, and the Netherlands. Journal of Studies in International Education 29(2): 319–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/10283153241307970
Pinna, Cristina. 2025. Comparative Perspective In EU Context: Policies And Instruments In Relevant EU Countries. In van der Wende M., et al. (eds.) Changing perspectives: towards conditions for sustainable EU-China collaboration in academic cooperation and R&D. Published by the China Knowledge Network (CKN). https://www.chinakennisnetwerk.nl/publications/changing-perspectives-towardsconditions-sustainable-eu-china-academic-collaboration
Rüffin, Nicolas V., Katharina C. Cramer, Maximilian Mayer, and Philip J. Nock. 2025.
“Research Security’ in Germany and the United States: Shifting Governance of Scientific Collaboration Under Geopolitical Pressure. Global Policy, advance online publication, pp. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70103
Rüland, Anna-Lena, Rüffin, Nicolas V., Wang, Ruowei and Mauduit, Jean-Christophe. 2025.
“The Implementation of Research Security Policies in Germany: Exploring Policy Narratives across Governance Levels.” European Security, advance online publication.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2025.2591708
Shih, Tommy, Chubb, Andrew and Cooney-O’Donoghue, Diarmuid. 2025. Processing the geopolitics of global science: Emerging national-level advisory structures. Journal of Studies in International Education 29(2): 300–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/10283153241307971
The post Research Security and the EU’s Geopolitical Turn: Governing Knowledge in a Changing World appeared first on Ideas on Europe.