The now and the before The Trump administration has confirmed the withdrawal of the United States from sixty-six international organisations and how this will put America first on the global stage. This continues a pattern of delivering a high-voltage shockwave to the policy norms that have underpinned global cooperation since 1945. We analyse the trajectory of US development cooperation and policy past, present and future in a new IDOS brief.
The now and the before The Trump administration has confirmed the withdrawal of the United States from sixty-six international organisations and how this will put America first on the global stage. This continues a pattern of delivering a high-voltage shockwave to the policy norms that have underpinned global cooperation since 1945. We analyse the trajectory of US development cooperation and policy past, present and future in a new IDOS brief.
The now and the before The Trump administration has confirmed the withdrawal of the United States from sixty-six international organisations and how this will put America first on the global stage. This continues a pattern of delivering a high-voltage shockwave to the policy norms that have underpinned global cooperation since 1945. We analyse the trajectory of US development cooperation and policy past, present and future in a new IDOS brief.
Volodimir Zelenszkij ukrán elnök a Telegramon közölte, hogy Oroszország az éjjel három ballisztikus rakétával és 113 drónnal támadta Ukrajnát. Kifejtette, hogy a csapások Dnyipropetrovszk, Zsitomir, Zaporizzsja, Harkiv és Herszon megyéket érték.
Elmondása szerint a célpontok főként energetikai objektumok voltak, „olyan létfontosságú infrastruktúra, amely biztosítja az emberek mindennapi életét: a fűtést és az áramellátást”.
Az államfő hangsúlyozta, hogy
Ukrajna számára most a légvédelem megerősítése a prioritás, elsősorban a rendszerekhez szükséges rakéták biztosítása.Szavai szerint szükség van a partnerek további hozzájárulására az ukrán fegyverigényeket kielégíteni hivatott NATO-kezdeményezéshez (PURL), valamint az európai raktárkészletekből érkező támogatásra és az Egyesült Államokkal kötött megállapodások gyorsabb végrehajtására.
„Most rendkívül fontos megerősíteni katonáinkat. Ha száz százalékban képesek leszünk kivédeni Oroszország támadásait, (Vlagyimir) Putyin (orosz elnök) terrorjának többé nem lesz értelme. Jelenleg ez (a száz százalékból hiányzó rész) az előnyük, és erre épít Oroszország. Meg kell fosztanunk ettől (a kis aránytól is). Ez sikerülhet, és rákényszerítheti Oroszországot a gyilkos támadások beszüntetésére és a béke felé való elmozdulásra. Hálás vagyok mindenkinek a világon, aki kész segíteni nekünk” – írta Zelenszkij.
Az ukrán légierő jelentése szerint egy ballisztikus rakétát és 89 drónt sikerült semlegesíteniük. Azonban két ballisztikus rakéta és 24, pilóta nélküli támadó repülőeszköz becsapódását rögzítették 13 helyszínen, valamint lelőtt drónok roncsainak lezuhanását három helyen.
Petro Pantelejev, a kijevi városi tanács helyettes vezetője szerdai sajtótájékoztatóján közölte, hogy a fővárosban jelenleg mintegy négyszáz lakóépületben nincs fűtés. Egyelőre nem tudta megmondani, hogy a helyreállításhoz még mennyi időre van szükség.
Ukrajna leggazdagabb üzletembere, Rinat Ahmetov Acélfront nevű katonai kezdeményezéséből egy újabb jelentős drónszállítmányt adtak át a nemzeti gárda Azov hadtestének.Az átadott eszközök értéke 214 millió hrivnya. Ahmetov cége, a Metinvest sajtóközleményében kiemelte, hogy a mostani szállítmánnyal együtt az Azov hadtestnek nyújtott évi összes támogatás értéke elérte a 600 millió hrivnyát.
Forrás: MTI
The post Zelenszkij: Ukrajna számára a légvédelem megerősítése a prioritás appeared first on Kárpátalja.ma.
La présidente Maia Sandu a créé le buzz en se déclarant toujours favorable à l'unification de son pays avec la Roumanie. Une manière de mettre la pression sur l'Union européenne pour relancer le processus d'intégration de la Moldavie ?
- Articles / Moldavie, Une - Diaporama, Relations régionales, Questions européennes, Courrier des Balkans, Moldavie Russie UE, Roumanie-Moldavie : gel, dégel et regel des relations bilatéralesYamide Dagnet, Senior Vice President, International at the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC). Credit: COP30
By Joyce Chimbi
NAIROBI, Jan 15 2026 (IPS)
President Donald Trump has escalated efforts to further distance the United States from international organizations and entities focused on climate, the environment, and energy. This strategy is in step with his administration’s established approach to undermine and redirect funds and international cooperation away from climate and clean energy programs.
But where some see a catastrophic escalation, other global experts, such as Yamide Dagnet, Senior Vice President, International at the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), see first and foremost a continuing formalization of damaging positions already taken by the current administration.
In January 2025, President Trump initiated a second withdrawal from the Paris Agreement on climate change to limit global warming. Simultaneously, the U.S. administration began to significantly reduce funding for climate programs, withdrawing from international climate funds such as the Green Climate Fund, cancelling billions in domestic clean energy grants, halting climate research and, overall, prioritizing fossil fuels over climate initiatives.
While conceding that the moment at hand is indeed overwhelming, especially coming on the back of COP30, Dagnet told IPS that “the rest of the world must turn this challenge into an opportunity to break new ground in climate action, financing and international cooperation.”
“I have a stubborn yet grounded optimism. The path ahead will be challenging but achieving the set-out climate goals is far from impossible. This is far from a catastrophe. Only one country has withdrawn from the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC); the rest of the world is still firmly on board.”
Regarding the exit from UNFCCC, Dagnet’s colleague Jake Schmidt from NRDC, pointed out in his blog that the legal ramifications are such that it is unsettled constitutional law whether a president can unilaterally withdraw from international agreements that the Senate gave its advice and consent to join. The Constitution specifies the entry provisions, but it is silent on the exit provisions.
Dagnet also noted that while the withdrawal from the UNFCCC is unprecedented, making the United States the only nation outside the bedrock UN Climate Treaty, “the exit is not cast in stone; a future administration could bring the country back to the fold.”
Nevertheless, the United States will be back in the headlines come January 27, 2026, when the country will technically become a non-signatory to the Paris agreement and will not be part of international climate negotiations unless the withdrawal is reversed.
“The optimism I feel is also grounded in pragmatism. To borrow the words of author James Baldwin, ‘Not everything that is faced can be changed, but nothing can be changed until it is faced.’ The U.S. administration was not represented at COP30 and still the world pushed forward a comprehensive climate action agenda to move beyond pledges through accelerated collaboration between governments, businesses, civil society, and investors.”
In his 2025 inauguration speech, Trump called oil ‘liquid gold’ and vowed to ‘unleash’ America’s fossil fuels in the form of oil and gas. Dagnet says the die was already cast on the path forward for the United States and that the world should continue to rethink, re-strategize and reorganize, for those who are for climate action are more than those against.
Trump finds an assortment of 66 UN and non-UN entities, including those focused on climate and clean energy, that are not aligned with the United States’ national interests. They include the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which is the world’s most authoritative scientific body on climate change, UN water, UN Oceans and UN Energy.
Others are the International Union for Conservation of Nature, which is the global authority on technical and policy advice on conservation, and the UN Collaborative Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing countries.
Non-UN organizations include the International Renewable Energy Agency, Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century, 24/7 Carbon-Free Energy Compact, Commission for Environmental Cooperation, Intergovernmental Forum on Mining, Minerals, and Sustainable Development, and the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.
Concerns are rife that communities such as those in the informal settlements will be dangerously exposed to the vagaries of climate change in the face of looming budget cuts to support climate efforts. Credit: Joyce Chimbi/IPS
There are widespread concerns that the withdrawal will have far-reaching negative consequences on financing and technical support for climate and clean energy. But Dagnet reminds us that the United States did not pay its dues to the UN in 2025. The UN Chief has expressed regret over the country’s exit from UN entities and urged the Trump administration to settle what is owed to the international body, as the payments are mandatory. The United States owes the largest share, amounting to about 22 percent of the regular budget.
Similarly, before this withdrawal, the United States was already failing to fulfill many of its climate finance commitments. While this new development, alongside past insufficient funding pledges, signals a major retreat from international climate action and support for developing nations, that challenge is not insurmountable.
Climate financing trackers found that even during President Joe Biden’s administration, the United States’ international climate finance contributions were insufficient and fell far short of goals. Dagnet notes that while the country’s actions on multilateralism represent a setback, multilateralism is also evolving and will hopefully be capable of navigating uncharted territories.
She hails the broad recognition that climate change urgently and sustainably requires global cooperation and collaboration. She further stressed that international cooperation would expand the climate finance basket, as financial support for climate action can come not only from governments but also from a diverse array of non-state and public-private actors.
“This withdrawal is not the end of the road.”
Dagnet is one of nine members of the GHG (Greenhouse Gas) Protocol Steering Committee, which is the primary governing body providing direction and oversight to the GHG Protocol. The Protocol provides accounting standards and tools to help the corporate sector, countries and cities track progress towards climate goals.
The development of such standards is facilitated through a transparent multi-stakeholder governance process, drawing on expertise from business, finance, governments, academia, auditors and civil society in a milestone move and landmark partnership, she says.
The GHG Protocol is leading the global harmonization of greenhouse gas accounting with the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), as part of the COP30 Action Agenda, to enable comprehensive decarbonization action. This collaborative effort will strengthen the enabling conditions (in terms of policy, benchmarking, and governance) that are paramount to achieving sectoral breakthrough and will shape the journey towards the next global stocktake, or inventory taking, on progress towards climate goals in line with the Paris Agreement.
Subnational efforts also keep Dagnet pragmatically optimistic and solutions-focused. Indeed, she felt energized after attending the Resilient Cities Forum 2025 in London, a remarkable highlight as a major international platform where global leaders and experts converged to tackle urban resilience, emphasizing collaboration, best practices and practical innovation for sustainable, equitable cities. She was inspired by the various and clear visions for a healthier planet.
“The resolve was stronger than ever,” says Dagnet.
“Importantly, we have locally designed tools, international frameworks and corporate standards to turn our vision towards a more prosperous, healthier and greener future into our lived reality. The worst we can do is to give up our imagination and ability to innovate.”
IPS UN Bureau Report
Follow @IPSNewsUNBureau
Le procès de 24 travailleurs humanitaires accusés d'avoir aidé l'entrée de migrants en Grèce reprend ce jeudi 15 janvier devant la cour d'appel de Mytilène, sur l'île de Lesbos. Ils encourent jusqu'à vingt ans de prison. Cette affaire est « l'un des plus graves exemples de criminalisation de l'aide humanitaire en Europe » selon le Parlement européen.
- Le fil de l'Info / Courrier des Balkans, Une - Diaporama - En premier, Migrants Balkans, Grèce, Populations, minorités et migrations, Une - Diaporama