Agrégateur de flux

Prosecutors in the US criminal tax case against Hunter Biden accused him of accepting payments from a Romanian businessman who sought to "influence US government agencies" in connection with a criminal probe in Romania.

Taylor Swift's three concerts in Vienna this week were cancelled after the government confirmed a planned attack at the stadium, the organiser announced late on Wednesday (7 August), and Austria's Chancellor Karl Nehammer said "a tragedy was prevented".

Editor’s Note: The following article contains excerpts from Lost Decade: The U.S. Pivot to Asia and the Rise of Chinese Power (Oxford University Press, 2024) with the permission of the publishers.

From Washington’s Farewell Address to Biden’s national security strategy, the core U.S. national interest, unsurprisingly, has not changed: to ensure the fundamental security of the homeland and its people in freedom. As Alexander Hamilton put it, “Self-preservation is the first duty of a nation.” Vital U.S. interests are all increasingly threatened by China and can be defined as the following:

1) To prevent the use and reduce the threat of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons and catastrophic conventional terrorist attacks or cyber attacks against the United States, its military forces abroad, or its allies.

China’s burgeoning intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) and nuclear capabilities present a threat to the American homeland and its forces abroad. China plans to increase its stockpile of strategic nuclear warheads from an estimated 500 in 2022 to 1,500 by 2035. This rise is accompanied by increased infrastructure-building to produce and separate plutonium. Beijing is reportedly constructing 300 new missile silos in the country’s western desert—a tenfold increase over the number operational in 2022—in addition to its arsenal of an estimated one hundred road-mobile ICBM launchers. 

2) To stop the spread of nuclear weapons, secure nuclear weapons and materials, and reduce further proliferation of intermediate and long-range delivery systems for nuclear weapons. 

Beijing continues to permit state-owned enterprises and individuals to violate the Missile Technology Control Regime (MCTR) and “proliferate technology that Iran has used to improve the accuracy, range, and lethality of its ballistic missiles.” At the same time, Beijing has undermined sanctions against Tehran by dramatically boosting its economic support for the Islamic Republic. China has steadily remained the Islamic Republic’s top trading partner, and commerce between the two countries exceeds $15 billion annually. If Iran eventually acquires a nuclear weapon, Beijing, through its economic and technical assistance, will bear substantial responsibility.

Beijing has also looked away as its citizens and corporations violate the MTCR vis-à-vis North Korea, despite China’s stated aim of finding a peaceful solution to Pyongyang’s nuclear program. A January 2023 Congressional Research Service report indicates that “Chinese financial companies set up paper companies to act as agents for North Korean financial institutions, evading sanctions to finance the North’s proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and ballistic missile programs.” 

3) To maintain a global and regional balance of power that promotes peace, stability, and freedom through domestic robustness, international power projection and influence, and the strength of alliance systems.

Beijing has mounted an all-out assault on the military, economic, and diplomatic balance of power in Asia and on America’s alliance system in the region. China’s military modernization, made possible by unprecedented increases in defense spending, laid the foundation for this rapid change. The People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) modernization includes a new command-and-control structure, upgraded equipment across the navy, air force, and army, expanded and improved training for cadets, and the establishment of the Strategic Support Force to centralize its new combat capabilities. In addition to the buildup of its nuclear arsenal, Beijing now boasts the world’s most oversized navy, as well as the largest ballistic and cruise missile inventory. 

On the economic front, China has pursued two strategies to undermine American power in the Indo-Pacific. First, Beijing threatens and coerces America’s partners in Asia to adopt policies conducive to Chinese regional dominance. Second, the People’s Republic (PRC) created and now promotes international economic organizations and initiatives that exclude the United States, privilege China’s position, and undermine global rules and standards. 

China also sought to expand its leadership in international governing institutions and weaken U.S. influence. At the United Nations (UN), in particular, Beijing has become more assertive and activist, mounting an assault on democratic norms, including the rule of law, human rights, transparency, and accountability. 

4) To prevent the emergence of hostile powers or failed states in the Western Hemisphere. 

Beijing has successfully attempted to deepen its strategic involvement with Latin American nations, increasingly at the expense of the United States.

China is now South America’s top trading partner and the second largest for Latin America as a whole, after the United States. That is a significant leap for a country that, in 2000, accounted for less than 2 percent of Latin America’s exports. China has built ports, railroads, and dams, installed 5G networks throughout Latin America, and loaned the region’s nations $138 billion. 

Notably, China has made a concerted attempt to engage Latin America and the Caribbean in the security domain. Beijing’s 2008 and 2016 policy papers for the region outline Chinese commitments to increase “military exchanges and cooperation,” assist the “development of the army in Latin American and Caribbean countries,” and “enhance cooperation in military trade and military technology.” Between 2002 and 2019, senior PLA leaders conducted 215 visits to the region, with Chile, Cuba, Brazil, and Argentina accounting for over half of these interactions. 

5) To ensure the viability and stability of major international systems (trade, financial markets, public health, energy supplies, cyberspace, the environment, freedom of the seas, and outer space).

Over the past fifteen years, China has sought to weaken virtually all these major global systems.

Through its repeated violations of international commercial practices, Beijing has disrupted the stability of world markets. It uses hundreds of billions of dollars in government subsidies and intentional overproduction to flood global markets with artificially low-priced Chinese goods and services. Beijing also restricts market access to foreign companies and imposes arbitrary non-tariff barriers.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, China delayed the transmission of crucial data for weeks and continues to resist any serious inquiry into the origins of the virus.In addition, China’s role in the fentanyl epidemic poses a direct threat to American citizens. China has created a sprawling and immensely powerful cyber operations command, which it employs to interfere with other nations and repress its own citizens. It uses cyberattacks and cyber espionage as elements of influence campaigns in the United States, through which it tries to shape public perceptions of China, suppress criticism, and mislead American voters. It has penetrated U.S. infrastructure and critical facilities and continues to steal data from hundreds of millions of Americans. 

China consistently hampers global efforts to slow climate change and mitigate its impact. It emits more greenhouse gases than any other country and constructs new fossil fuel infrastructure across the world as part of its Belt and Road Initiative. It also exposes its own air, soil, and waterways to immense pollution. 

China claims sovereignty over the South China Sea (SCS) and declares the area its “inherent territory,” inconsistent with the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. Beijing’s assertive behavior in the South China Sea challenges established norms in the maritime domain, such as geographical boundaries, the rights of countries to control natural resources within their delineated zones, and international dispute resolution mechanisms. 

In pursuit of Xi’s “eternal dream” for China to become a “space power,” Beijing has also made a concerted effort to expand its private and state industries rapidly. The PLA draws an explicit link between space and conflict; its 2020 Science of Military Strategy document describes “the dominance of space [as] inseparable from the outcome of war.” 

This enumeration vividly demonstrates China’s comprehensive policies to undermine each of America’s five vital national interests that safeguard and enhance Americans’ survival and well-being in a free and secure nation and bolster international order. As U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin explained in late 2022, “The PRC is the only country with both the will and, increasingly, the power to reshape its region and the international order to suit its authoritarian preferences.” 

In weakening these five vital U.S. interests by threatening nuclear annihilation, Beijing could deter the United States from acting in a crisis. In attempting to dominate Asia, China could prompt nuclear proliferation across the region, beginning with South Korea or even Japan, as countries seek a last-ditch nuclear deterrent capability. A China-dominated Asia could fatally fragment the United States’ Asian alliance system, as one U.S. ally after another kowtows to Beijing. The PRC could undermine U.S. ties with Mexico and other countries in Latin America to distract the United States from pursuing its national interests in Asia and elsewhere. A China that dominated Asia would alter global values, rules, and practices to the United States’ disadvantage. 

Steve Tsang, director of the China Institute at London’s School of Oriental and African Studies, summed up the Chinese president’s ambitions. “Xi Jinping,” he said, “is not trying to out-compete America in the existing liberal international order dominated by the [United States]. His long-term goal is to change the world order into a Sino-centric one.”

Robert D. Blackwill is the Henry A. Kissinger senior fellow for U.S. foreign policy at the Council on Foreign Relations.

Richard Fontaine is the chief executive officer of the Center for a New American Security. Follow him on LinkedIn and X @RHFontaine. 

Mr. Blackwill and Mr. Fontaine are the co-authors of Lost Decade: The US Pivot to Asia and the Rise of Chinese Power, published by Oxford University Press in June 2024.

Image: Humphery / Shutterstock.com. 

Russia said on Wednesday (7 August) it was fighting intense battles against Ukrainian forces that had penetrated its southern border near a major natural gas transmission hub, in one of the largest incursions into Russian territory since the war began.

Last month was the second hottest July for the planet on record, breaking a 13-month period when each month was warmest, which had been in part fuelled by the warming El Nino weather pattern, the EU's Copernicus Climate Change Service said on Thursday.

En environ une semaine, près de dix mille personnes qui fuient l’insécurité dans la localité de Tchomia, sont arrivées à Mokambo dans le territoire de Mahagi (Ituri), ont rapporté mercredi 7 août, des sources coutumières locales.

Parmi ces personnes se trouvent essentiellement des enfants, des personnes âgées ainsi que des femmes enceintes qui vivent dans des conditions difficiles. 

La société civile de Mokambo, demande aux autorités et aux humanitaires de leur venir en aide. 

Thousands of police and anti-racism protesters gathered on streets across Britain on Wednesday (7 August) to challenge expected far-right groups that failed to materialise following more than a week of violent racist attacks targeting Muslims and migrants.

The European Union, France and the UK on Wednesday (7 August) condemned a far-right Israeli minister for suggesting it would be "justified and moral" to starve two million Gazans to free scores of captives held in the Palestinian territory.

Americas Lockheed Martin has selected Voyager Space to provide an advanced upper stage solid-propulsion subsystem for the US Missile Defense Agency’s Next Generation Interceptor (NGI) defense capability. Under the partnership, the Denver-based firm will lead the design and production of a “flight-qualified, production-ready subsystem” before the NGI’s expected delivery date. Callan Marine Limited, Galveston, Texas, was awarded a $105 million firm-fixed-price contract for Brazos Island Harbor channel deepening. Bids were solicited via the internet with three received. Work will be performed in Brownsville, Texas, with an estimated completion date of August 28, 2026. Fiscal 2024 civil construction funds in the amount of $104,974,200 were obligated at the time of the award. US Army Corps of Engineers, Galveston, Texas, is the contracting activity. Middle East & Africa The United States military has completed its withdrawal from air base 201 in Niger, officials said on Monday, after Niger’s ruling junta ordered nearly 1,000 U.S. military personnel to leave following a coup last year. Air base 201, a drone base near Agadez in central Niger that was built at a cost of $100 million, had provided crucial intelligence about Islamist militant groups before the coup. Europe The Latvian National Armed Forces finally received its first […]

How Kyiv Can Capitalize on Russia’s Waning Momentum

The Trump shooting and the risk of more bloodshed.

Les deux taekwondoïstes ivoiriens représentent, à eux seuls, trois des quatre médailles olympiques de leur pays. Ils préparent ensemble les JO de Paris 2024.

Summary and Key Points: The F-35 stealth fighter jet program saw significant developments in July after months of delays. The Pentagon, Lockheed Martin, and the F-35 Joint Program Office resumed deliveries of the aircraft following a temporary fix for TR-3 software issues.

-Greece also joined the F-35 program, ordering 20 F-35A jets, making it the 19th participant and strengthening Europe’s F-35 presence.

-U.S. Air Force F-35As intercepted Russian and Chinese aircraft near Alaska, demonstrating their operational readiness. Additionally, Italian F-35s participated in joint training with Australia, underscoring their role in the Indo-Pacific. Over 1,000 F-35s have been delivered, with more than 3,500 ordered.

The F-35 Comeback Has Started 

After months of delays, the F-35 stealth fighter jet program is returning to strength. 

July was the most active month for the F-35 program in a long while, with several different developments across the globe. 

Deliveries, A New Member, Action Against Chinese and Russian Aircraft 

To begin with, the Pentagon, Lockheed Martin, and the F-35 Joint Program Office in July reached an agreement to resume deliveries of the stealth aircraft. Lingering issues with the TR-3 software update have been fixed, at least temporarily, and Lockheed Martin is once more delivering aircraft to program participants. 

Moreover, in July the State Department formally approved Greece’s bid to join the F-35 community as the 19th participant. Greece ordered 20 F-35A Lightning II stealth fighter jets and has the option to purchase another 20 at a later date. Europe is now an F-35 bastion, with 12 out of the 19 participants of the program, and 575 fighter jets located on the continent. 

Further, U.S. Air Force F-35A fighter jets faced down Chinese and Russian aircraft. Specifically, on July 24, two F-35A Lightning II fighters identified and intercepted two Russian Tu-95 Bear and two Chinese Xian H-6 strategic bombers over the Alaska Air Defense Identification Zone. The F-35As operated alongside Canadian F/A-18 Hornets and American F-16 Fighting Falcons, showcasing their ability to seamlessly operate alongside other aircraft.

In addition, Italian F-35As and F-35Bs transited all the way to Australia to participate in joint training with the Royal Australian Air Force. It was an important show of unity in the Indo-Pacific. As a NATO member, Italy could be asked to contribute forces in the region in the event of a conflict between the United States and China.

The F-35 Lightning II is a multi-role stealth fighter jet. The fifth-generation aircraft comes in three versions: the F-35A, F-35B, and F-35C. They are the same aircraft with slight differences. 

The F-35A is the conventional version that takes off and lands from regular runways. The F-35B is the Short Take-Off, Vertical Landing iteration that can take off and land like a helicopter, making it an excellent choice for expeditionary warfare. Finally, the F-35C is the carrier version of the aircraft and is designed to operate from aircraft carriers. 

Lockheed Martin has delivered more than 1,000 aircraft of all versions. Put together, the F-35 program has a total of 3,542 orders for aircraft. The F-35A version is by far the most popular, with over 2,660 aircraft. The U.S. Air Force remains the biggest customer with an order for 1,763 F-35As, and the U.S. military as a whole has ordered almost 2,500 aircraft of all three versions for the Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps. 

About the Author: 

Stavros Atlamazoglou is a seasoned defense journalist specializing in special operations and a Hellenic Army veteran (national service with the 575th Marine Battalion and Army HQ). He holds a BA from the Johns Hopkins University and an MA from the Johns Hopkins’ School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS). His work has been featured in Business Insider, Sandboxx, and SOFREP.

All images are Creative Commons and/or Shutterstock. 

Jordanian Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi’s visit to Tehran marks the first time in nearly ten years that one of Amman’s top officials has visited Iran. The region is on the brink of war, and Jordan may soon have to choose between upholding its commitments to its allies and antagonizing its Palestinian-majority population.

Iran and its proxies have vowed to retaliate against Israel following the recent assassinations of Hamas chief Ismail Haniyeh and Hezbollah commander Fuad Shukr. Iranian media claim Safadi aimed to persuade Iran not to retaliate. At the same time, the Jordanian government framed the trip as an effort “to address disagreements between Amman and Tehran transparently for mutual benefit.”

Jordan today is facing the same dilemma it did in April, following Israeli airstrikes in Damascus that killed top officers from Iran’s Islamic Revolution Guard Corps. Iran struck back by launching more than 300 missiles and drones in Israel’s direction, several of them penetrating Jordanian air space on the way to their targets. The Iranian salvo confronted Amman with a difficult decision: Would it join the United States, Britain, and Israel in a joint effort to defeat the attack, or would it hold back to avoid riling up its population, many of whom would rather see Iran and Hamas prevail?

On the night of April 13, Jordan chose to assist Israel by intercepting Iranian drones over its airspace, leading Tehran to threaten, “The Iranian armed forces are closely monitoring Jordan's movements during the process of disciplining the Zionist entity. If Jordan participates in any potential actions, it will then become the next target.”

Jordan framed its decision as a defensive action to protect its sovereignty and airspace, not as a gesture of support for the Jewish state. This approach aimed to calm the public and mitigate any potential backlash.

Since October 7, Iranian proxies have incited protests in Jordan, especially after the assassination of Ismail Haniyeh. Demonstrations over the past week have shown increased support for Hamas, with marchers waving Hamas flags, wearing Qassam headbands, and chanting, “Our army is the army of the free...Protectors of the homeland...We are your soldiers, O Sinwar.”

The repercussions of an Iranian attack on Jordan are not only domestic. Safadi stated a few days ago in a clear signal to Iran that Jordan would rather not be a battlefield for any conflict and “will firmly confront anyone attempting to violate Jordanian airspace.”

In addition to inciting protests, Iranian proxies have increased their efforts to turn Jordan into a base for attacks against Israel. In March, Iraq-based Kataib Hezbollah threatened to “arm 12,000 Jordanians to defend their brethren in Palestine.” In April, Hamas spokesperson Abu Ubayda said, “the most important Arab front—especially popular and most concerning to the enemy—are the cherished Jordanian masses to whom we send our greetings and call upon to escalate their actions.” In June, reports in Arab media claimed that authorities found explosives in an apartment in Amman and linked them to new Iranian attempts to smuggle weapons and explosives into Jordan for domestic use.

Jordan’s leadership faces a critical challenge: maintaining domestic stability while balancing its sovereignty and commitments to Western allies. Safadi’s visit represents a crucial effort to dissuade Iran from involving Jordan in its regional conflict with Israel. However, Amman must remain cautious. The Islamic Republic has long harbored ambitions to destabilize Jordan, and its malign networks in the region have been the primary source of Amman’s security challenges.

In the event of an Iranian or proxy attack targeting Israel, Jordan should replicate its defensive posture from the night of April 13. This approach will help maintain its reliability and important security relationship with Israel and the United States. Additionally, Jordan should employ the same narrative it used on that night, framing the action as purely defensive to dampen any potential uproar.

Ahmad Sharawi is a research analyst at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.

Image: Alexandros Michailidis / Shutterstock.com. 

Summary and Key Points: NASA operated a unique F-15 fighter jet, known as the F-15 Flight Research Facility, which was highly modified from its U.S. Air Force counterparts. This one-of-a-kind aircraft was used to test and demonstrate advanced integrated flight and propulsion control technologies.

-It was the first to showcase a fully integrated inlet-engine-flight control system and a Self-Repairing Flight Control System (SRFCS), among other innovations.

-The F-15 was involved in over 25 research projects, including testing the Space Shuttle’s thermal protection tiles, contributing significantly to NASA's aerodynamics, propulsion control, and safety advancements.

NASA Had A Special F-15 Fighter

Did you know that NASA operated a single F-15 fighter jet? NASA’s lone F-15 was a highly modified version of its U.S. Air Force counterparts. NASA used this aircraft to demonstrate and evaluate advanced integrated flight and propulsion control technologies. 

The jet was known as the F-15 Flight Research Facility. 

One of a kind

The F-15 Flight Research Facility is the only aircraft of its kind ever made. The jet hit plenty of other firsts, too, as “the first aircraft to demonstrate a fully integrated inlet-engine-flight control system, a self-repairing flight control system, and a propulsion-only flight control system,” NASA explains.

Whereas a standard F-15 features mechanical electronic flight controls, the NASA F-15 carried a dual-channel, fail-safe digital flight control system. The result was an airframe used across an expansive flight envelope to conduct “complex and sophisticated research projects.”

Here are a few of the systems that the F-15 Flight Research Facility testing helped to develop: ADECS (Adaptive Engine Control System); SRFCS (Self-repairing Flight Control System); PSC (Performance Seeing Control); and PCA (Propulsion Controlled Aircraft). Not bad for a single testing platform. 

In all, the F-15 was used for “more than 25 advanced research projects involving aerodynamics, performance, propulsion control, control integration, instrumentation development, human factors, and flight test techniques.”

Perhaps the most publicly prominent test the F-15 Flight Research Facility ever conducted was for the Space Shuttle’s thermal protection tiles. The tiles coat the surface of the Space Shuttle to act as a collective heat shield during re-entry to the Earth’s atmosphere. They were notoriously difficult to design, manufacture, and install on the Space Shuttle. The F-15 had a significant role getting the tiles dialed in and ready for installation, which allowed the Space Shuttle to finally take flight – one of NASA’s biggest wins ever.

Learning to Fly

NASA’s F-15 was the first aircraft to demonstrate a Self-Repairing Flight Control System. The SRFCS “demonstrated the ability of a flight control system to identify the failure of a control surface and reconfigure commands to the other control devices such as ailerons, rudders, elevators, and flaps to continue the aircraft’s mission or allow it to be landed safely,” according to NASA.

Here’s an example of how the SRFCS might work: A rudder is damaged, or fails entirely mid-flight. The SRFCS identifies the dead rudder and calculates how the still-functioning flight surfaces can be adjusted to compensate for the dead rudder. Meanwhile, the SRFCS displays information in the cockpit telling the pilot how the remaining flight surfaces are being reconfigured, The pilot also learns the new operational limits resulting from the reconfigurations, i.e. reductions in “G’ loading, airspeed, angle-of-attack, and altitude.

In addition to identifying failures in flight surfaces, the SRFCS could diagnose failures in the jet’s electrical, hydraulic, and mechanical systems.   

About the Author: Harrison Kass 

Harrison Kass is a defense and national security writer with over 1,000 total pieces on issues involving global affairs. An attorney, pilot, guitarist, and minor pro hockey player, Harrison joined the US Air Force as a Pilot Trainee but was medically discharged. Harrison holds a BA from Lake Forest College, a JD from the University of Oregon, and an MA from New York University. Harrison listens to Dokken.

Image Credit: Creative Commons.

Summary and Key Points: The USS America (CV-66), a conventionally-powered Kitty Hawk-class aircraft carrier, served the U.S. Navy from 1965 to 1996. Known as "Big A," the ship played significant roles in the Vietnam War, the Six-Day War, Operation Eagle Claw, and Operation Desert Storm, among others.

-Despite her stellar service record, she met an unfortunate end when she was deliberately sunk during a U.S. Navy exercise in 2005.

-The data gained from her sinking provided valuable insights into carrier survivability, but many believe the legendary vessel deserved a better fate, possibly as a museum to honor her contributions.

USS America (CV-66) was a Legend

The USS America (CV-66) was a conventionally-powered Kitty Hawk-class aircraft carrier that served the United States Navy from 1965-1996. She was built by Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company and was initially based in Norfolk, Virginia. This warship would go on to provide stellar service to her country.

She was known as “Big A” by her crew and the ship’s official motto was “Don’t Tread On Me.” 

“Big A” Service Record

In terms of CV-66, she served in the Vietnam War. This carrier was used to launch airstrikes against targets deep inside North Vietnam. Indeed, according to MilitaryFactory.com, the USS America, living up to her great name, “performed to mythical standards,” as the America never lost any of her pilots in air combat over the unfriendly skies of Indochina. Indeed, a whopping 11,000 tons of ordnance over 10,500 sorties, were dropped on Vietcong targets.

After the Vietnam War, the USS America (CV-66) was not done serving. During the Six-Day War between Israel and its Arab neighbors, the America was deployed to the Mediterranean Sea as part of a larger US Navy flotilla. That flotilla included the infamous USS Liberty. Still a controversy today, the USS Liberty was conducting surveillance of the ongoing Israel-Arab war in 1967 near the warzone when, according to the official account, Israeli warplanes misidentified the American warship for an enemy one and ordered the destruction of the boat. Israeli torpedo boats attacked the American ship, killing thirty-four US sailors and injuring another seventy-five.

Once word got out to the US fleet that Liberty was under attack, America’s airwing went into action, providing support for the stricken warship. 

She also participated in the failed Operation Eagle Claw, which was President Jimmy Carter’s shambolic attempt to free the captured American hostages in Iran. It failed, to the chagrin and shame of everyone involved.

Multiple operations thereafter demanded the carrier’s time and attention, such as the Reagan administration’s mini-war with Muammar Gaddafi’s Libya. America supported multiple engagements against the Libyan military during the 1980s. 

Notably, CV-66 was involved with Operation Desert Storm in 1991. This boat provided important aerial support for the US forces fighting against the Iraqi Army in the mission to liberate Kuwait from Iraq’s illegal invasion. America would launch 3,000 sorties throughout the war. In the 1990s, her last decade of service, she supported the enforcement of the No-Fly Zones over Iraq and participated in the Clinton administration’s air war over Bosnia.

Her Design

CV-66 was a fairly common-looking US aircraft carrier with a familiar design. It had a starboard island and an angled deck with three catapults for launching warplanes. Four hangar elevators serviced the flight deck. She carried a whopping seventy-nine aircraft, both fixed-wing and rotorcraft, making her a potent asset on the battlefield. The aircraft that comprised her airwing included the likes of the legendary F-4 Phantoms, A-6 Intruders, A-7 Corsair IIs, and SP-2 Neptunes. 

This boat was not without defenses. America had an electronic countermeasures suite that included the Raytheon-built AN/SLQ-32. At first, the old Terrier missiles were included in the warship’s armaments package. Eventually, these were swapped out for the Sea Sparrow surface-to-air missiles. Three, 20mm Phalanx Close-In Weapon Systems (CWIS) were installed to further assist with anti-aircraft and anti-missile defense. 

USS America: She Deserved Better

This legendary boat, unfortunately, met an ignominious end. 

Rather than be preserved as a museum, she was ultimately sent to the bottom of the drink. No, the USS America was not sunk in combat with one of America’s enemies. The great ship was sunk during an exercise in which she was the target practice by US forces back in 2005.

It was a tragic end to a legendary ship. 

At the same time, though, it should be noted that the American sinking of the USS America (CV-66) allowed the US military to learn crucial information about how aircraft carriers can survive a serious fight—and how long it takes for these behemoths to go under the waves. 

That information, while still classified, remains an important set of data points for the US Navy to incorporate in the designs and operations of their current fleet of Nimitz-class and Gerald R. Ford-class aircraft carriers. 

After all, America’s enemies are deeply wedded to the notion of sinking US carriers in combat. Especially China. By sinking the America during a test, the Navy was able to learn about some of the weaknesses of its carrier fleet and could have conceivably mitigated the threat those weaknesses posed. 

The Navy brass insisted that the USS America died as she lived: serving the US Navy. However, one cannot help but think that this glorious warship was wasted. 

By sinking her in a test the Navy did learn some interesting tidbits. But she deserved better. This was most obvious considering her stellar service record across thirty years. 

Author Experience and Expertise: Brandon J. Weichert

Brandon J. Weichert, a National Interest national security analyst, is a former Congressional staffer and geopolitical analyst who is a contributor at The Washington Times, the Asia Times, and The-Pipeline. He is the author of Winning Space: How America Remains a Superpower, Biohacked: China’s Race to Control Life, and The Shadow War: Iran’s Quest for Supremacy. His next book, A Disaster of Our Own Making: How the West Lost Ukraine, is due October 22 from Encounter Books. Weichert can be followed via Twitter @WeTheBrandon.

All images are Creative Commons or Shutterstock. Main image is of a Ford-Class carrier under shock test. 

From the Vault

Russia Freaked Out: Why the U.S. Navy 'Unretired' the Iowa-Class Battleships

Battleship vs. Battlecruiser: Iowa-Class vs. Russia's Kirov-Class (Who Wins?)

Image Credit: Creative Commons and/or Shutterstock.

Most of President William Ruto's plans for the economy since coming to power are in tatters.

Le chef du gouvernement a été démis de ses fonctions, mercredi soir, sans explication officielle. Il est remplacé par le ministre des affaires sociales, Kamel Madouri.