Summary and Key Points: The Russian aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov is notorious for belching thick black smoke, a result of its outdated Mazut-fueled propulsion system.
-Mazut, a heavy fuel oil, produces harmful emissions and poses environmental risks, contributing to the carrier's poor performance and operational limitations.
-Originally a Soviet-era design, the Admiral Kuznetsov was intended as a stepping stone for a more expansive Soviet carrier fleet, but the collapse of the USSR left Russia with a dilapidated vessel.
-Despite its inefficiencies, Russia continues to invest in the carrier, highlighting a questionable commitment to maintaining a largely ineffective naval asset.
Admiral Kuznetsov: Russia’s Sinking Investment in an Aging WarshipBelching thick black smoke into the cerulean blue skies as it traverses the world’s oceans, the Russian aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov leaves a black Sharpie-like line for all its potential adversaries to see. It’s a unique sight on the world’s oceans because most warships today do not spew such filth visible to the naked eye as the boat navigates throughout the world.
But the Admiral Kuznetsov is a rare and unique boat. Not in the valuable way, but in the sunk cost way.
An aging, decrepit carrier held over from the final days of the Soviet Union, the Kuznetsov billows its pollution into the skies above because of its archaic propulsion system. Kuznetsov is powered by Mazut, a tar-like fuel that is a byproduct of the oil refining process and is commonly used in industrial and commercial applications such as heating and power generation.
Mazut is also known as heavy fuel oil or bunker fuel, and it is typically used in large ships and power plants.
Understanding MazutMazut has a high sulfur content and is, again, known for its thick, black smoky emissions. When burned, mazut releases a number of harmful pollutants into the air, including sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter. These pollutants can have a significant impact on air quality and can contribute to a range of health problems, including respiratory illnesses, heart disease, and cancer.
In addition to its impact on air quality, mazut can have a negative effect on water quality. When spilled or leaked into bodies of water, which the Admiral Kuznetsov routinely and notoriously does with wanton abandon, mazut can form an oil slick that can harm aquatic life and damage the surrounding ecosystem.
Thus, Russia’s war both on its neighbors and on the environment continues unabated in the twenty-first century.
The use of mazut fuel on the Admiral Kuznetsov has been a source of controversy, as it contributes to the ship’s poor environmental performance. Indeed, mazut, unlike other sources of fuel that power warships, is a highly limiting factor in the operational abilities of the dying Russian flattop, despite that it is a relatively abundant and cheap fuel source.
The decision to use mazut fuel on the Admiral Kuznetsov is likely due to multiple factors, though. Yes, it is abundant in Russia and cheap. But another possible reason is that the use of mazut was an attempt by the old boat’s Soviet engineers to simplify the aircraft carrier’s propulsion system.
Gas turbine engines are typically designed to run on lighter, cleaner fuels, but the use of mazut may have been seen as a way to reduce the warship’s complexity (and, therefore, to cheapen its construction and maintenance).
What the Admiral Kuznetsov Is & Is NotWhen the Soviets designed the Admiral Kuznetsov, they did it more as a proof of concept and less as the beginning of a new trend in the Soviet Navy. Had the flattop been successful (more importantly, had the USSR not collapsed when it did), the Admiral K would have been used as the basis for springboarding the Soviet Red Navy into massive aircraft carrier operations to challenge the U.S. Navy.
Since the USSR did unexpectedly collapse and the Russians entered a dark decade of despair in the aftermath (that Russia is only now climbing out of), Moscow has been forced to remain committed to a clearly dilapidated warship.
Admiral Kuznetsov: The Aircraft Carrier Tragedy for Russia That Won't EndWhen—and if—the Russians really do enhance their carrier capabilities, one can anticipate that the next batch of Russian carriers will be far more complex and reliable than the current Admiral Kuznetsov.
At the same time, though, Russia has never been (and likely never will be) a maritime power. With that in mind, it might be a better move for the Russians to prioritize their ground, space, and air forces over their navy.
They might want to simply focus on building submarines and smaller surface warships, as the Russians are better at that than they are at wasteful carrier operations.
However, Moscow’s decision to blow so much money on keeping the dying Admiral Kuznetsov sailing indicates Moscow’s frankly bizarre commitment to the Admiral K that defies strategic logic and reason.
About the Author:Brandon J. Weichert, a National Interest national security analyst, is a former Congressional staffer and geopolitical analyst who is a contributor at The Washington Times, the Asia Times, and The-Pipeline. He is the author of Winning Space: How America Remains a Superpower, Biohacked: China’s Race to Control Life, and The Shadow War: Iran’s Quest for Supremacy. His next book, A Disaster of Our Own Making: How the West Lost Ukraine, is due October 22 from Encounter Books. Weichert can be followed via Twitter @WeTheBrandon.
All images are Creative Commons and/or Shutterstock.
Jamais dans l'histoire moderne de la Serbie, l'Église n'a été si proche du pouvoir politique. Aleksandar Vučić a besoin de s'appuyer sur les structures de l'orthodoxie. Mais pourquoi le patriarche Porfirije accepte-t-il ce jeu dangereux ? Et la Serbie est-elle encore un État laïc ?
- Articles / orthodoxie, Vucic, Serbie, Religions, Relations régionales, Politique, Radio Slobodna EvropaJamais dans l'histoire moderne de la Serbie, l'Église n'a été si proche du pouvoir politique. Aleksandar Vučić a besoin de s'appuyer sur les structures de l'orthodoxie. Mais pourquoi le patriarche Porfirije accepte-t-il ce jeu dangereux ? Et la Serbie est-elle encore un État laïc ?
- Articles / orthodoxie, Vucic, Serbie, Religions, Relations régionales, Politique, Radio Slobodna Evropa, Une - DiaporamaL'Ukraine presse la Moldavie voisine de renvoyer les hommes d'âge militaire qui fuient la conscription, mais Chișinău entend respecter les règles internationales et européennes de protection des droits des réfugiés.
- Le fil de l'Info / Courrier des Balkans, Ukraine, Moldavie, Relations régionales, Migrants Balkans, Défense, police et justice, Populations, minorités et migrations, Une - DiaporamaLes Nations Unies ont salué mercredi 31 juillet, l’annonce faite la veille par l’Angola selon laquelle les gouvernements de la République démocratique du Congo et du Rwanda ont convenu d’un cessez-le-feu qui devrait entrer en vigueur le 4 août.
Un conflit oppose l’armée congolaise à la rébellion du Mouvement du 23 mars (M23), appuyée par le Rwanda, dans la province du Nord-Kivu, dans l’Est de la RDC.
Professeur à la faculté de Théologie de l’Université Catholique du Congo à Kinshasa, abbé Guelord Mindela Bungu a appelé, mercredi 31 juillet, les enfants à honorer leurs parents.
Il a lancé cet appel en marge de la journée mondiale des parents vivants et morts, célébrée le 1er aout de chaque année.
Ce prélat catholique a fait savoir que la célébration de la fête des parents a un sens profond.
A portugál főváros, Lisszabon Belém kerületében, a Tejo torkolatának közvetlen közelében magasodik egy szürke, úszótalpas repülőgépet mintázó emlékmű. A gép légcsavaros orra az Atlanti-óceán felé néz, arra, amerre 1922. március 30-án két portugál repülő elindult, hogy eljusson Brazíliába.
Portugália, a kis ibériai ország, amely Luzitánia néven a Római Birodalom egyik tartománya volt, a XV. század második felétől a tengeri kereskedelem révén tornázta fel gazdaságát. Jelen volt az Atlanti-óceáni szigeteken és Afrikában, s még távolabb, India és a Távol-Kelet felé kacsintgatott. Miután Bartolomeu Dias és Vasco da Gama Afrika megkerülésével megtalálta a kelet felé vezető utat, a portugálok ott is megvetették a lábukat és folytatták azt, amit a fekete kontinensen már magas szinten űztek: a kizsákmányolást, és a helyi lakosság rabszolgasorba hajtását vagy legyilkolását. A Lisszabonból induló kereskedelmi hajók először az uralkodó passzáttal a dél-atlanti vizek felé hajóztak, hogy megkerülhessék Afrikát. Valószínűleg ennek volt köszönhető, hogy 1500 áprilisában a Pedro Álvares Cabral vezette flotta a mai Brazília partjaihoz vetődött. Az új területnek egy ideig nem szenteltek komolyabb figyelmet, mert a fókuszban továbbra is Afrika és a kelet kincsei valamint „humán erőforrása” volt. Idővel azért elkezdték rugalmasan értelmezni a világot spanyol és portugál érdekszférára osztó, 1494-es tordesillasi szerződést. Hosszas ottlétre rendezkedtek be a hatalmas földterületen, amely végül az 1530-as években portugál gyarmat lett. Nevét az atlanti erdőiben honos, vörös folyadékot tartalmazó brazilfáról kapta és a mai napig az egyetlen ország Dél-Amerikában, ahol a spanyol helyett a portugál a hivatalos nyelv.
Summary and Key Points: The U.S. military is developing its own anti-ship capabilities to counter threats in the Indo-Pacific, particularly from China's advanced anti-ship ballistic missiles like the DF-21D and DF-26B. During the 2024 Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercise, the U.S. Air Force tested the Quicksink, a low-cost, GPS-guided bomb, using a B-2 Spirit stealth bomber to sink the ex-USS Dubuque.
-This new strategy emphasizes using stealth bombers to deliver precision-guided bombs, offering a potentially effective and economical method to neutralize large naval threats, including carriers, echoing tactics successfully employed during World War II.
The U.S. Military is Developing Its Own Carrier Killers – Meet the QuicksinkThere has been a lot of hype about China's advanced anti-ship ballistic missiles. Both the DF-21D, with a range of up to 2,150 km, and the DF-26B, with a range of 4,000 km, threaten naval vessels operating in the Indo-Pacific – notably the U.S. Navy's nuclear-powered supercarriers.
The range of those weapons could deny access to U.S. and other warships in the South China Sea and in other waters Beijing claims.
However, the United States is also developing anti-ship ordnance, and earlier this month put its low-cost Quicksink to the test. The guided bomb was dropped by a U.S. Air Force B-2 Spirit stealth bomber during the ongoing Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) 2024 exercise.
The long-range strategic bomber employed the relatively inexpensive GPS-guided bombs in a SINKEX of the ex-USS Dubuque (LPD-8), an Austin-class amphibious transport dock.
"This capability is an answer to an urgent need to quickly neutralize maritime threats over massive expanses of ocean around the world at minimal costs," the U.S. Navy's 3rd Fleet said in a statement following the sinking of the former LPD-8.
It was one of two SINKEX, a sink-at-sea live-fire training exercise involving decommissioned U.S. Navy warships, with the ex-USS Tarawa also sunk by a long-range anti-ship missile.
Stealth Bombers and Guided BombsMuch of the emphasis on anti-ship ordnance in recent years has gone to ballistic missiles and hypersonic weapons. The speed and kinetic force of hypersonic missiles would mean that an explosive warhead might not be required to do significant damage to a warship such as a carrier.
But that is only if the missiles, hypersonic or otherwise, strike a target.
Experts suggest that could be far more difficult than it sounds. The Pacific Ocean is vast, and carriers are speedy vessels screened by a carrier strike group that includes guided-missile destroyers specifically designed to counter incoming threats. Likewise, efforts are underway to develop Directed Energy Weapons including lasers that could counter missiles and drones.
Even as the U.S. military continues to develop hypersonic missiles, it is now exploring a rather old-school anti-ship approach – bombs dropped by aircraft. It worked with great success in World War II to send the Imperial Japanese Navy's fleet of carriers to the bottom of the Pacific Ocean, and it could do the same to China's new carriers.
"The B-2's demonstrated anti-maritime capability will constrain if not deter plan operations east of Taiwan or off the Philippines," retired U.S. Navy Capt. Carl O. Schuster, former director of the U.S. Pacific Command Joint Intelligence Center, told CNN. "You cannot ignore a weapon that can sink a 25,000-plus-ton ship with one hit."
Schuster makes a good point. A low-cost guided bomb delivered by a stealth aircraft – not a missile fired from land-based launchers – might just be the true carrier killer.
Author Experience and Expertise: Peter SuciuPeter Suciu is a Michigan-based writer. He has contributed to more than four dozen magazines, newspapers, and websites with over 3,200 published pieces over a twenty-year career in journalism. He regularly writes about military hardware, firearms history, cybersecurity, politics, and international affairs. Peter is also a Contributing Writer for Forbes and Clearance Jobs. You can follow him on Twitter: @PeterSuciu. You can email the author: Editor@nationalinterest.org.
Image Credit: Creative Commons and/or Shutterstock.