Mis en cause dans l'enquête italienne sur les « snipers du week-end » durant le siège de Sarajevo, le président serbe Aleksandar Vučić dément toute implication et promet des poursuites contre plusieurs médias internationaux.
- Le fil de l'Info / Courrier des Balkans, Siège sarajevo, Vucic, Serbie, Défense, police et justice, Bosnie-HerzégovineDie Weltklimakonferenz in Brasilien endet ohne Fahrplan zur Abkehr von fossilen Energien. Energieexpertin Claudia Kemfert, Leiterin der Abteilung Energie, Verkehr, Umwelt im DIW Berlin, kommentiert dies wie folgt:
Die COP30 in Belém ist aus europäischer Sicht enttäuschend. Die Konferenz endet ohne einen Fahrplan zum Ausstieg aus Kohle, Öl und Gas – obwohl mehr als 80 Staaten ein klares Fossil-Exit-Signal gefordert hatten. Eine kleine Gruppe fossilorientierter Länder konnte dies blockieren und dominiert weiterhin die internationale Agenda. Damit bleibt das Klimaregime hinter den wissenschaftlichen Erfordernissen zurück; das 1,5-Grad-Ziel rückt weiter in die Ferne.
Für die EU und Deutschland heißt das: Wir dürfen nicht länger auf globale Einigungen warten, sondern müssen selbst vorangehen – mit massivem Ausbau erneuerbarer Energien, Energieeffizienz, Speichern und klarer Rückführung fossiler Abhängigkeiten. Regionale Allianzen und sektorale Ausstiegspfade werden noch wichtiger. Waldschutz- und Finanzierungsinitiativen sind positiv, ersetzen aber keinen verbindlichen Ausstieg aus fossilen Energien.
Auch bei Klimafinanzierung und Anpassung bleiben die Beschlüsse hinter dem Bedarf zurück. Besonders vulnerable Staaten benötigen deutlich mehr verlässliche, zusätzliche Mittel, um Klimarisiken zu bewältigen und Anpassungsstrategien umzusetzen. Ohne ausreichende Finanzierung drohen wachsende Schäden, Instabilität und globale Ungleichheit.
Belém zeigt: Die Welt bewegt sich – aber zu langsam. Ambitionierter Klimaschutz bleibt ökologisch wie ökonomisch die vernünftigste Strategie. Gerade jetzt braucht es Führung – nicht Fossil-Blockaden.
Le vernissage de l'exposition de photographies de Katherine Cooper, intitulée « Rencontres avec les derniers Serbes du Kosovo », aura lieu le mercredi 22 octobre 2025 à 19h30 au Centre culturel de Serbie.
L'exposition réunit 50 photographies artistiques qui illustrent la vie des Serbes vivant dans les enclaves du Kosovo-et-Métochie : leurs foyers, leurs monastères, leurs coutumes et leur quotidien.
Photographe d'origine sud-africaine, Katherine Cooper vit et travaille en France depuis (…)
Le vernissage de l'exposition de photographies de Katherine Cooper, intitulée « Rencontres avec les derniers Serbes du Kosovo », aura lieu le mercredi 22 octobre 2025 à 19h30 au Centre culturel de Serbie.
L'exposition réunit 50 photographies artistiques qui illustrent la vie des Serbes vivant dans les enclaves du Kosovo-et-Métochie : leurs foyers, leurs monastères, leurs coutumes et leur quotidien.
Photographe d'origine sud-africaine, Katherine Cooper vit et travaille en France depuis (…)
Credit: UN News/Felipe de Carvalho
By Ginger Cassady
BELÉM, Brazil, Nov 21 2025 (IPS)
Belém, at the mouth of the Amazon River, was always going to be a symbolic host for the UN COP30 climate summit, but the mood here has gone far beyond symbolism.
Indigenous Peoples, forest communities, women, workers and youth have set the tone in the streets and in the many grassroots spaces across the city. Their message has been consistent and clear — the Amazon cannot survive under the same financial system that is destroying it.
Inside the talks, however, governments are still trying to confront a planetary emergency while operating within a global economic architecture built for extraction. Debt burdens, high borrowing costs, reliance on extractive commodities, volatile currencies and investor-driven pressures all shape what is deemed “possible” long before negotiators put pen to paper.
This is the constraint the UN climate regime cannot escape: countries are expected to deliver climate action within a financial order that makes that action prohibitively expensive.
For wealthier countries, maintaining this structure shields their budgets and geopolitical leverage. For many developing countries, pushing for more ambitious outcomes means navigating the limits imposed by debt service and credit ratings. Emerging economies face their own entanglements, tied to commodity markets and large-scale extractive industries that remain politically powerful.
Overlaying this landscape is the relentless influence of lobbyists from fossil fuel companies, agribusiness conglomerates, commodity traders and major banks. Their presence across delegations and side events narrows the space for solutions that would challenge their business models.
What remains “deliverable” tends to be voluntary measures, market mechanisms and cautious language—steps that do not shift the structural incentives driving deforestation, fossil expansion and land grabs.
The Just Transition Debate Exposes the Real Fault Line
Nowhere is this tension more visible in the final hours of COP30 than in the negotiations over the Just Transition Work Programme. Many industrialized countries continue to frame just transition in narrow domestic terms: retraining workers and adjusting industries. For most of the G77, it is inseparable from land governance, food systems, mineral access, rights protections and—above all—financing that does not reproduce dependency and extraction.
The proposed Belém Action Mechanism reflects this broader vision. It could embed rights, community leadership, implementation support and a mandate to confront the systemic barriers that make unjust transitions the norm. But its language remains heavily bracketed — a sign of both political resistance and the pressure from vested interests uncomfortable with shifting power toward developing countries and frontline communities.
Debt-Based Forest Finance: The TFFF’s Structural Risks
The Tropical Forests Forever Facility (TFFF), launched by Brazil ahead of COP30, has become a flashpoint for these concerns. Despite political appeal, its reliance on long-term bonds and private capital ties forest protection to the expectations of bond markets rather than to the rights and priorities of the Peoples who live in and protect the forests.
Civil society groups have warned that the TFFF risks locking forest countries deeper into market volatility, exposing them to investor-driven conditions, and prioritising investment returns toward creditors over Indigenous Peoples or forest communities.
By treating forests as financial assets within debt markets, the model risks repeating the very dynamics that have fueled deforestation: inequitable power relations, external control and dependence on private capital.
As the talks wind down, negotiators should be frank about the stakes: debt-based climate finance will entrench, not ease, the vulnerabilities that climate action must confront.
Food, Land and the Weight of Finance
The financialization of land and food systems also looms over COP30’s final outcomes. Agribusiness giants, asset managers and commodity traders have reshaped agriculture into a global investment sector, consolidating land, driving forest loss and sidelining small-scale producers.
Draft texts now reference agroecology and Indigenous knowledge, but the political space for transforming these systems remains limited. Without addressing how speculative capital and global supply chains dictate land use, any agreement will fall short of what climate resilience truly requires.
Rights and Human Safety Under Threat
In the closing days of the talks, attempts to dilute gender language, weaken rights protections and sideline environmental defenders have drawn strong backlash from civil society and many governments. These are not isolated disputes; they reflect the political economy of extraction. Where industries rely on weak rights protections to expand, rights language becomes a bargaining chip.
The Indigenous Political Declaration: A Blueprint for Structural Change
As negotiators haggle over bracketed text, the Amazon-wide Indigenous Political Declaration stands out as one of the most coherent and grounded climate agendas to emerge at COP30. It calls for:
• Legal demarcation and protection of Indigenous territories
• Exclusion of mining, fossil fuels and other extractive industries from Indigenous lands.
• Direct access to finance for Indigenous Peoples — not routed through state or market intermediaries that dilute rights or impose debt.
• Recognition of Indigenous knowledge and governance systems as central to climate solutions.
• Protections for defenders, who face rising threats across Amazonian countries.
This is not simply an agenda for the Amazon; it is a structural map for aligning climate action with ecological reality.
The Divide That Now Matters
As COP30 closes, it is clear the old frame of North versus South cannot explain the choices before us. The more revealing divide is between those defending an extractive financial order and those fighting for a rights-based, equitable and ecologically grounded alternative. Many of the interests blocking climate ambition in the North are aligned with elites in the South who profit from destructive supply chains.
Indigenous Peoples, women, workers and small-scale farmers share more in common with one another across continents than with the financial interests influencing their own governments.
Belém has forced the world to confront the limits of incremental change within an extractive order. Whether the final decisions reflect that reality will determine not just the legacy of this COP, but the future of the Amazon itself.
IPS UN Bureau
Follow @IPSNewsUNBureau
Excerpt:
Ginger Cassady is Executive Director, Rainforest Action NetworkA newly refurbished and fully equipped child-friendly and victim-centered interview room was inaugurated today at the Sector for Internal Affairs in Bitola, providing a safe, private, and trauma-informed space for conducting sensitive interviews with victims and witnesses, including children. This intervention is part of the project Swedish Support to Police Reform in North Macedonia, which aims to enhance the institutional capacity of the Police of the country to adhere to international best practices and human rights standards in the areas of Juvenile Justice and Community Policing.
The opening ceremony was attended by the Head of the OSCE Mission to Skopje, Ambassador Kilian Wahl, the Ambassador of Sweden to North Macedonia, Ola Sohlström, the Deputy Minister of Internal Affairs, Astrit Iseni, and the Head of Sector of Internal Affairs Bitola, Sasho Mircheski.
The new facility is designed in accordance with international standards and best practices and will support police officers and criminal justice professionals in applying a victim-centered approach in cases of domestic violence, violence against women and girls, trafficking in human beings, and juvenile justice.
Speaking at the opening, Ambassador Kilian Wahl underlined that “victims need special protection and a safe space that will prevent re-victimization and not inflict new trauma.”
Ambassador Sohlström reiterated Sweden’s commitment to supporting accountable and people-centered policing practices, both with expertise and funding, and that Sweden, though the Embassy in North Macedonia, is proud to support this important work. The Swedish Ambassador noted that this important step is a demonstration of the Ministry of Interior’s commitment to promoting a justice system that prioritizes the dignity, safety, and best interests of every child.
Deputy Minister Iseni reaffirmed the Ministry’s ownership and commitment to sustainability and focus on making victim-centered approaches standard across all police sections.
The initiative reflects the constructive partnership between the Ministry and the Swedish Police Authority in building a modern, accountable, and community-oriented police service in North Macedonia which is responsive to the needs of all citizens. It also reflects the overarching objective of the Swedish reform support to North Macedonia to assist to the country in its EU integration process also in the areas of rule of law, human rights and gender equality, and it supports the Government’s national reform priorities and the OSCE Mission’s thematic focus on gender equality, police development, and efforts to prevent and respond to violence against women and girls.
Held on the eve of the global 16 Days of Activism against Gender-Based Violence campaign, the event also underscores how partnership between institutions and international partners can deliver tangible improvements for victims and survivors throughout North Macedonia.
The initiative is realized under the Swedish Support to Police Reform in North Macedonia, implemented by the Swedish Police Authority, funded by Sweden, and within the framework of the extrabudgetary project “Building a Hybrid Education System in the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of North Macedonia”, led by the OSCE Mission to Skopje. The Republic of Finland has also provided targeted support enabling the implementation of this initiative and demonstrating continued trust in our joint efforts.
BANJA LUKA, 21 November 2025 – International election observers will hold a press conference to present their findings following the early election of the president of Republika Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
What:
Who:
When:
Where:
The international election observation is a joint effort of the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR), the Council of Europe Congress of Local and Regional Authorities (Congress), and the European Parliament (EP). The mission totals 37 observers, composed of 15 ODIHR experts, 16 members and staff from the Congress, and 6 from the EP.
For more information, please contact:
Katya Andrusz, ODIHR: +48 609 522 266 or katya.andrusz@odihr.pl
Stéphanie Poirel, Congress: + 33 6 63 55 07 10 or Stephanie.POIREL@coe.int
Raffaele Luise, EP: +32 470 952199 or raffaele.luise@europarl.europa.eu
As the 7th AU-EU Summit convenes in Luanda, marking 25 years of partnership, the AU-EU relationship faces a critical juncture. This Policy Brief, “From Cairo to Luanda: A 25-Year Parliamentary Stocktake of AU-EU Relations” argues that the partnership must evolve from symbolic engagement toward a genuinely equitable relationship. The brief examines persistent challenges and opportunities across four areas: geopolitical shifts and the pursuit of a partnership of equals; reframing peace and security cooperation around equity and conflict prevention; ensuring the Global Gateway fosters local prosperity, particularly in Critical Raw Materials; and addressing human capital, mobility, and debt as interconnected priorities. It underscores the essential role of the Pan-African and European Parliaments in translating high-level commitments into tangible benefits for citizens.
As the 7th AU-EU Summit convenes in Luanda, marking 25 years of partnership, the AU-EU relationship faces a critical juncture. This Policy Brief, “From Cairo to Luanda: A 25-Year Parliamentary Stocktake of AU-EU Relations” argues that the partnership must evolve from symbolic engagement toward a genuinely equitable relationship. The brief examines persistent challenges and opportunities across four areas: geopolitical shifts and the pursuit of a partnership of equals; reframing peace and security cooperation around equity and conflict prevention; ensuring the Global Gateway fosters local prosperity, particularly in Critical Raw Materials; and addressing human capital, mobility, and debt as interconnected priorities. It underscores the essential role of the Pan-African and European Parliaments in translating high-level commitments into tangible benefits for citizens.