Malawian Farmers harvest sweet potatoes in fields where no chemicals have been used. Credit: Albert Khumalo
By Benson Kunchezera and Tanka Dhakal
LILONGWE & VIENTIANE, May 7 2026 (IPS)
For decades, pesticides have been a quiet pillar of Malawi’s agriculture, guarding crops against pests, improving yields, and sustaining millions of livelihoods. But beneath this success story lay a troubling reality: weak regulation, unsafe handling practices, and growing threats to human health and the environment.
Between 2015 and 2023, USD 2.55 million by the Global Environment Facility (GEF) set out to confront these challenges head-on. Today, it is leaving behind a legacy that is transforming how Malawi manages pesticides from importation to disposal and reshaping the way farmers think about crop protection.
At the centre of this shift is a stronger institutional framework. The project supported a comprehensive review of national pesticide regulations, bringing them closer to international standards. It also invested in training regulatory staff in pesticide registration, monitoring, enforcement, and lifecycle management, areas that had long remained underdeveloped.
“We invested heavily in strengthening systems, not just solving immediate problems,” said Precious Chizonda, Registrar of the Pesticides Control Board of Malawi and former National Coordinator for the GEF project. “This has positioned Malawi to better manage pesticides across their entire lifecycle, from importation to disposal.”
A major milestone was the development of a strategic plan for the Pesticides Control Board (PCB), aimed at improving efficiency and aligning operations with global best practices. Collaboration played a crucial role. The Malawi Bureau of Standards provided laboratory services for pesticide quality testing, while the Ministry of Agriculture ensured policy coordination. Together, these institutions helped elevate the PCB’s effectiveness and national visibility.
Some examples of pesticide-free farming include bananas grown using manure and tomatoes grown using neem water to deter pests and a woman farmer is shown mixing ash with her pigeon peas for storage to protect them from weevils. Credit: Albert Khumalo
Obsolete Pesticides
The project also delivered concrete environmental results. Approximately 208 tonnes of obsolete pesticides — including highly hazardous persistent organic pollutants — were safely destroyed through high-temperature incineration. Another 40 tonnes of contaminated waste were secured in an engineered landfill. These efforts eliminated long-standing sources of soil and water pollution, protecting ecosystems and communities.
Equally significant was the introduction of a pilot system for managing empty pesticide containers. Initially constrained by regulatory challenges, the initiative has since gained traction and continues beyond the project’s lifespan. Supported by industry stakeholders such as CropLife, it now collects used containers from farms across the country, demonstrating a viable model for environmentally sound waste management.
A field of irish potatoes grown without using chemicals. Credit: Albert Khumalo
Farm Level Changes
But perhaps the most profound change is happening at the farm level.
In Lichenza, under Chiladzulu’s Thumbwe Extension Planning Area, 39-year-old farmer Emily Zuwedi recalls how deeply rooted pesticide use once was. “We used to believe in pesticides when growing our crops, but that is now a thing of the past,” she said.
Zuwedi joined a farmer training group in 2017, where she learned about integrated pest management (IPM) and alternative methods that reduce reliance on chemicals. Today, she grows onions and beans using these techniques, cutting costs while protecting her health and the environment.
“I am spending less money now, and my crops are still doing well,” she said.
Her experience reflects a broader shift among smallholder farmers. Albert Khumalo, an Extension Development Officer in Chiladzulu, said the transition was not immediate. “At first it was difficult for farmers to accept, but after the trials they get along,” he explained.
Since 2024, Khumalo and his team have trained at least 100 farmers in pesticide-free farming methods. The results are encouraging – farmers are reducing production costs, improving soil health, and becoming more environmentally conscious.
“This program is helping farmers conserve the environment while also saving money,” Khumalo said. “And those who learn are now able to share knowledge with others.”
The project has also strengthened Malawi’s compliance with international chemical conventions by building expertise in risk assessment and regulatory procedures, an area where the country previously faced challenges.
While gaps remain, particularly in scaling up initiatives to reach more smallholder farmers, the progress is undeniable. Malawi is demonstrating that agricultural productivity and environmental protection do not have to be at odds.
Across the country’s fields, a quiet transformation is underway – one in which safer practices, stronger systems, and informed farmers are cultivating not just crops but also a more sustainable future.
In Lao PDR, the UNDP and the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry lead a $4.2 million GEF-funded FARM project. Credit: Lao farmer network
Laos Sustainable Farming
However, GEF funding is being used in several parts of the world, including Asia.
In Lao PDR, GEF funding is helping farmers adopt and apply practices that promote sustainable agriculture.
Laos farmers are being trained and given extension support to “reduce dependence on hazardous pesticides while integrating environmentally friendly pest management approaches”, Saithong Phengboupha, project manager at the Department of Agriculture under the Ministry of Agriculture and Environment, said.
“This aligns their practices with good agricultural standards, translating upstream policy gains into tangible on-farm change.”
According to the Ministry, GEF funding has been helpful to create the foundation by strengthening the legislative and regulatory environment governing pesticide and agricultural input management.
“Key milestones include the promulgation of the Law on Crop Production and the development of decrees on fertiliser regulation and good agricultural practices (GAP), currently in the final stages. The instruments establish the legal basis for sustained enforcement and compliance beyond the project lifecycle,” Phengboupha said, explaining how FARM funding is being used to improve the agricultural future of the country.
The $4.2 million initiative through the FARM project is led by the UNDP and the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry.
The FARM project is establishing a pilot on agrochemical container and plastic waste management in Viengphoukha District, Luang Namtha Province.
Smallholder farmers have responded to the pesticide management training and promotion of alternatives to chemical pesticides. Credit: Marco J Haenssgen/Unsplash
Integrated Pest Management
According to the ministry, the pilot is designed to demonstrate the effectiveness of a structured approach for the collection, interim storage, and environmentally sound management of empty pesticide containers.
“It also aims to strengthen institutional coordination among relevant government agencies, local authorities, and private sector stakeholders, while enhancing farmer awareness and compliance with recommended practices, including triple rinsing, segregation, and safe return mechanisms,” he said.
The project has supported awareness-raising and capacity building among local authorities, extension workers, and farmers on the risks associated with obsolete and banned pesticides, as well as on safe handling, repackaging, and temporary storage practices. In selected locations, pilot measures have been introduced to improve containment, labelling, and secure storage to minimise environmental and health risks.
Phengboupha says smallholder farmers in Lao PDR have generally responded positively to Integrated Pest Management (IPM) training and the promotion of alternatives to chemical pesticides supported by the FARM project. He added “training interventions have contributed to improved understanding of pest ecology, safer pesticide use practices, and the benefits of adopting non-chemical and low-toxicity control methods, including biological control, cultural practices, and mechanical measures.”
However, adoption rates vary depending on access to extension services, market pressures, availability of alternative inputs, and perceived short-term effectiveness of chemical pesticides.
“Constraints remain, including limited access to certified biopesticides, weak input supply chains for IPM alternatives, and continued reliance on agrochemical vendors for technical advice in some areas,” he added.
Note: The Eighth Global Environment Facility Assembly will be held from May 30 to June 6, 2026, in Samarkand, Uzbekistan.
This feature is published with the support of the GEF. IPS is solely responsible for the editorial content, and it does not necessarily reflect the views of the GEF.
IPS UN Bureau Report
Follow @IPSNewsUNBureau
Related Articles
F-15E Strike Eagle 93-0311’s new camouflage paint scheme was officially unveiled on Apr. 28, 2026 to mark forty years since RAF Lakenheath took part in Operation El Dorado Canyon. The scheme is representative of the one worn by the F-111 Aardvarks employed on the long-range strike mission against Libya, with a special tribute paid to KARMA 52 – the only F-111 lost during the raid, resulting in the deaths of pilot Captain Fernando L. Ribas-Dominicci and weapon systems officer (WSO) Captain Paul F. Lorence.
91-0311 departing RAF Lakenheath on May. 7. | Source: Stewart JackOur friend, aviation photographer Stewart Jack, captured these images of 93-0311 as it took off on a training sortie on May. 7, flying under the callsign EAGLE 31. Notably, the jet was seen to be carrying eight inert versions of the GBU-12 Paveway II guided bomb, distinguishable by solid blue casings.
EAGLE 31 took off from Lakenheath with wingman EAGLE 32 shortly after 08:30 local time (07:30 UTC), and began their sortie by meeting with a KC-135 Stratotanker to take on fuel before heading to the low flying areas of North Wales. After finishing up the low flying segment of their sortie, EAGLE flight headed for the Holbeach Air Weapons Range on the coast north of RAF Lakenheath where the entire payload was dropped.
This essentially simulates a real world strike mission, with a low-level ingress through the Welsh Valleys before setting up for weapon employment at the range simulating the target.
91-0311 departing RAF Lakenheath on May. 7. | Source: Stewart JackThe GBU-12 is one of the most commonly seen variants from the Paveway series, and equips a 500 lb Mark 82 bomb with a nose-mounted laser seeker unit and deployable tail guidance fins. These fins have an ‘on/off’ style of operation – known in the industry as bang-bang guidance – where the control surfaces can only deflect at the maximum amount, with no fine adjustment. The bomb’s guidance system accounts for this by over-correcting for any course adjustments then immediately deflecting in the opposite way to align with the intended trajectory. This method allows for simpler mechanics and electronics, lowering the overall cost for the single-use system.
Being able to easily carry such a large number of these munitions is one of the F-15E’s biggest strengths. In the images we can see that even with such a load, the jet’s wing hardpoints are still empty and would be available for external fuel tanks and/or air to air weaponry. All of the air to ground munitions are carried on fuselage stations, with the additional mounting points on the aircraft’s conformal fuel tanks (CFT) – fitted on each side of the aircraft, outboard of the air intakes – providing significant extra capacity.
A U.S. Air Force F-15E Strike Eagle conducts a combat air patrol in the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility, May 7, 2025. | Source: U.S. Air Force Photo by Staff Sgt. John C.B. EnnisOn the F-15, these CFTs are also known as ‘FAST Packs’ – Fuel and Sensor, Tactical – and were initially developed for the air to air focused F-15C. In U.S. service, these have almost exclusively been associated with the Strike Eagle, and these darker-colored Eagles are rarely seen without them. The main U.S. Air Force F-15Cs seen to regularly carry them were those based with the 57th Fighter Interceptor Squadron (FIS) at Keflavik, Iceland.
Watch them fly bayou!
Louisiana’s 159th Fighter Wing #Boeing F-15Cs take flight with new conformal fuel tanks – increasing #USAF range and homeland defense capability! #F15 #AirNatGuard pic.twitter.com/qjrRNblIQC
— Boeing Defense (@BoeingDefense) February 5, 2018
Since the CFTs cannot be jettisoned in flight to gain extra speed and maneuverability, the air-to-air focused pilots of the F-15C have preferred to use more traditional drop tanks. For the F-15E’s strike mission, the permanent impact to the aircraft’s flight characteristics are a worthy trade-off for the additional range and payload options they offer.
The U.S. has said it doesn’t plan to operate its F-15EX Eagle IIs with CFTs, although this may be reconsidered with the expansion of the F-15EX order and the prospect of them replacing older F-15E Strike Eagles in the coming years.
Many thanks as always to Stewart Jack for contributing these images, you can find him on Facebook and Instagram.