A kiszolgált katonák élete valószínűleg helytől és kortól függetlenül sosem volt könnyű, még akkor sem, ha az őket szolgálatba hívó állam történetesen hajlandóságot mutatott a velük való törődésre. Persze így is akadnak, akikből ilyen helyzetben nemhogy nem párolog el az életkedv és tettvágy, mint ahogy ez sajnos sokukkal megtörténik, hanem a békeidőket kihasználva egyenesen belevetik magukat vérmes elgondolások megvalósításába.
Szélsőséges példa erre Ludvig Kahlen hadnagy története, aki a XVIII. századi porosz hadseregben bizonyára példásan kitanult fegyelmet, szorgalmat és rendezettséget burgonyatermesztő telepesként remélte sikeresen kamatoztatni. Az ilyesmi ugyebár sosem számított kifejezetten könnyed, kényelmes életformának, de az eltökélt Kahlen ezt képes volt még azzal megfejelni, hogy a dániai Jüt-félsziget északnyugati részén, a Pallas Nagylexikon leírása szerint terméketlen, "posványoktól megszakított homokos területen" kezdett gazdálkodni.
In mid-February, the world’s largest elections took place in Indonesia over the course of a single day. Around 205 million eligible voters were called to the polls to elect a new president, vice president and almost 20,000 representatives for the national, provincial and district parliaments. The spotlight was largely centred on the presidential election, as the president plays a prominent role in the country’s political system, and according to the official results released on 20 March, General Prabowo Subianto will be assuming office in October. His election as head of state is seen by some observers as a threat to Indonesian democracy or even a return to dictatorship. However, it is much more likely that Prabowo will maintain the policies of his predecessor Jokowi, who prioritised the economic development of the country. Nonetheless, democratic institutions and procedures are likely to be further weakened. Germany and the EU should be prepared for Indonesia to adopt a more active and self-confident foreign policy stance under Prabowo as Jakarta will likely come to be driven by a decidedly transactional understanding of international cooperation.
A cég a 178,66 millió forint összköltségű projektje során acélszerkezet gyártó üzemét bővítette, valamint eszközbeszerzést és szervezetfejlesztést is megvalósított. A beruházáshoz a Károlyi és Társa Kft. a Széchenyi Terv Plusz program „A mikro-, kis- és középvállalkozások modern üzleti és termelési kihívásokhoz való alkalmazkodását segítő fejlesztések támogatása a leghátrányosabb helyzetű régiókban” című felhívásán nyert el 125,06 millió forint feltételesen vissza nem térítendő európai uniós támogatást.
A Károlyi és Társa Kft. 1990 óta foglalkozik építőipari kivitelezéssel, középületek, ipari- és lakóépületek építésével.
A fejlesztési beruházás keretében a Mezőberény, Vásártér utca 10. szám alatti üzemcsarnok bővítése valósult meg mintegy 834 m2-el. A csarnoképület utcai végében kiépített új iroda és szociális helyiségek szolgálják a dolgozók megfelelő munkahelyi körülményeit.
A projekt keretében egy 15 kWp teljesítményű napelemrendszer telepítése is megvalósult, melyet az új épületrész tetőzetére helyeztek el.
A vállalkozás a projekt során új termelőeszközöket is beszerzett, melyek a JCB 4CX Pro Stage5 AEC típusú földmunkagép, egy 3 tonna teherbírású dízelüzemű targonca, két db védőgázas Weldi -Míg 4500 W típusú hegesztőberendezés, valamint egy MBS 300 DG PRO típusú fémfűrészgép.
A projekt keretében a Károlyi és Társa Kft. a szervezeti struktúra és tevékenységek optimalizálását segítő szakértői szolgáltatást is igénybe vett, valamint 3 fő angol nyelvi képzése is megvalósult.
A megvalósított fejlesztések a vállalkozás hatékonyabb termelését segítik elő, továbbá a képzés és szervezeti struktúra korszerűsítésére vonatkozó tanácsadás a vállalat irányításában, a munkaerő felkészültségében jelent előrelépést, és hozzájárul a munkahelyek megtartásához is.
A Széchenyi Terv Plusz program GINOP_PLUSZ-1.2.3-21 számú pályázati kiírásán 125 059 300 forint támogatást elnyert, 178 656 143 forint összköltségvetésű fejlesztés 2022. február 28-án indult és 2024. február 29-én zárult.
Diversifying Germany’s bilateral partnerships in the Indo-Pacific is one of the central goals of German policy. On the one hand, this diversification aims to reduce economic dependence on China, and on the other – in the context of systemic rivalry with authoritarian states – to bring about cooperation with states that share common values with Germany, so-called Wertepartnern (value-based partners). However, it is not clearly defined which values are fundamental to value-based partnerships. It also remains unclear which states in the Indo-Pacific are referred to as value-based partners and how these value-based partnerships differ from “normal” bilateral relations with other states in the region. Instead, this study shows that the significance that is rhetorically attached to cooperation with value-based partners is at odds with the vague concept of “value-based partnership” and its limited importance as a basis for bilateral cooperation. A comparison of value-based partners with a control group of non-value-based partners across different policy areas produces mixed results. The assumed correlation between being categorised as a value-based partner and closer international cooperation based on shared norms and values cannot, with any coherence, be demonstrated empirically. A comprehensive revision of the hitherto diffuse concept of value-based partnerships is recommended – either by normative sharpening, combined with a narrowing of the circle of states designated as value-based partners, or by eradicating the term from the political vocabulary.
Yes, they have to negotiate w/ Hamas. Just like the Brits had to negotiate with the IRA in Northern Ireland in the 1990s. The IRA were terrorists. They almost killed Margaret Thatcher once. But negotiation was necessary for durable peace. Have to do it in Israel now & end the war https://t.co/3WblyxUcfB
— Zane (@zanealb04) March 8, 2024It is not an unexpected sentiment.
Those negotiations led to the Good Friday Agreement in 2001, where the Irish Republican Army agreed to begin disarming. It was an amazing achievement.
CNN interviewed Secretary of State Colin Powell and British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw. Powell praised the agreement, saying it "shows what can happen when one remains persistent and is determined to solve what appear to be intractable problems." Midway through the press conference, the topic of Israel came up.
The final question was, "Secretary Powell, does the situation in Northern Ireland not show us all that negotiations is really the only way forward in all of these situations?" Israel was not mentioned, but it clearly was on everyone's mind.
Powell responded:
what we have seen in Northern Ireland in the last 24 hours, which culminates a process that took many, many years long to get to this point, is an example of what can be achieved when people of good will come together, recognize they have strong differences -- differences that they have fought over for years -- but it's time to put those differences aside in order to move forward and to provide a better life for the children of Northern Ireland.Very...tactful. He praised both the participants and the diplomatic process in general.
But Straw got in the last word:
It also has to be said that, before that happened, there had to be a change of approach by those who saw terrorism as the answer. And that approach partly changed because of the firmness of the military and police response to that terrorism. And if there had not been that firm response by successive British governments and others to the terrorist threat that was posed on both sides, we would not have been able to get some of those people into negotiation, and we'd not be marking what is a satisfactory day in the history of Northern Ireland today.Before diplomacy could work, terrorism had to be defeated and those who practiced it had to reject it. And for that to happen, military force was necessary.
And terrorism still needs to be rejected. A diplomatic approach won't suffice.
Daniel Pipes, president of the Middle East Forum, made this point in his Victory Project. He wrote in 2017 that Israel needs "to indicate to the Palestinians that this conflict, this war that they have been engaged in for a century, is over. And they lost. And they've got to recognize it." He describes a plan of deterrence that goes beyond tough tactics:
When Palestinian “martyrs” cause material damage, pay for repairs out of the roughly $300 million in tax obligations the government of Israel transfers to the Palestinian Authority (PA) each year. Respond to activities designed to isolate and weaken Israel internationally by limiting access to the West Bank. When a Palestinian attacker is killed, bury the body quietly and anonymously in a potter’s field. When the PA leadership incites violence, prevent officials from returning to the PA from abroad. Respond to the murder of Israelis by expanding Jewish towns on the West Bank. When official PA guns are turned against Israelis, seize these and prohibit new ones, and if this happens repeatedly, dismantle the PA’s security infrastructure. Should violence continue, reduce and then shut off the water and electricity that Israel supplies. In the case of gunfire, mortar shelling, and rockets, occupy and control the areas from which these originate.Israel has used some of these suggestions, such as subtracting from the tax money that goes to the PA in response to Abbas's pay-to-slay program. And in light of the Hamas massacre of October 7, Israel may consider stricter measures, both in terms of Gaza and the West Bank. The measures themselves are not purely punitive. Their goal is deterrence and ultimately to show the Palestinian Arabs that they have lost.
That would be the opposite of the approach of the Dalai Lama to the terrorist attack of 9-11:
How to respond to such an attack is a very difficult question. Of course, those who are dealing with the problem may know better, but I feel that careful consideration is necessary and that it is appropriate to respond to an act of violence by employing the principles of nonviolence. The Dalai Lama (YouTube screenshot)In 2009, the Dalai Lama was still saying the same thing:
The Dalai Lama, a lifelong champion of non-violence on Saturday candidly stated that terrorism cannot be tackled by applying the principle of ahimsa [non-violence] because the minds of terrorists are closed.And if the minds of terrorists are closed, then as Jack Straw suggested, military force is necessary, and as Daniel Pipes says, you have to convince them that they have lost.
Who knows? Maybe even Biden understands that to a degree. In an interview following his State of the Union Address, Biden was asked when Hamas really wants a ceasefire:
If Hamas is allowed to live to fight another day -- it will.
The fact remains -- Israel will not win unless Hamas loses.