- Polarization as an impact of crises and its connection to radicalization leading to violent extremism through the study of two crises: a) the migration/refugee crisis of 2015-2016 and b) the pandemic.
- An important part of the problem is the political mainstreaming of extremist narratives, that is, the choice of politicians to increasingly exploit far-right and conspiratorial narratives that have been supported by segments of the population in recent years.
- Polarization is an issue that concerns groups of individuals and not lone actors
- the risk of conflict is magnified when society is divided into two equal groups with competing goals”
- Multiple crises are more dangerous, as on the one hand they exert greater pressure on the management mechanisms of states and on the other hand they expand the vulnerability of societies, groups and individuals.
- A broad sense of democratic deficit and two successive processes of questioning have been created that lead to a crisis: a) of trust and b) of representation.
- Prolonged polarization has led to the radicalization of a large number of citizens, without necessarily resulting from the support of a specific ideology
- Disinformation, the spread of fake news and the dissemination of conspiracy theories constitute a threat to democracy and have caused significant problems in electoral processes and fuel polarization.
- The pandemic acted as a catalyst and influenced radicalization, but also the way extremist groups operate.
Read here in pdf the Policy paper by Triantafyllos Karatrantos, ELIAMEP Research Associate (in Greek).