Foreign Policy

He has boosted the private sector and fired tens of thousands of civil servants.

Protests, legal challenges, and bipartisan backlash are converging on the administration’s tactics.

Interfering in Latin American affairs is Washington’s bread and butter.

In its response to protests, the U.S. evokes repressive regimes around the world.

With childhood friends and top leaders in the firing line, the system is frozen with fear.

The Islamic Republic was built to withstand sustained unrest.

The U.S. president said he and the NATO secretary-general “formed the framework of a future deal” but provided few details.

As the United States blusters and threatens, European leaders are making tough choices.

An infrastructure project between Afghanistan, Iran, and India gets caught in Trump’s crosshairs—again.

Firing central bank governors may prove to be a red line.

The Kremlin may be using Africans as suicide bombers in Ukraine, reports suggest.

The continent is finally showing some strategic resolve. Will it last?

Lawmakers opted against using the power of the purse to forbid forcible annexation of Greenland.

Trump follows Greenland threats by announcing a “future deal,” while Canada’s prime minister describes it all as a “rupture in the world order.”

In his speech in Davos, Trump asked for the territory and said only the United States could defend it.

Delcy Rodríguez is the latest spare politician to be thrust into a top job.

Read Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney’s forceful speech at Davos rebuking Trump’s world order.

Washington can intervene militarily, but any regime change strategy needs to start in Iran itself.

The answer is global—and has big implications for U.S. policy.

Beijing’s response to the latest agreement was predictably spiky.